Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Driving in a cycle lane

  • 03-03-2019 4:25pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 265 ✭✭


    Hi Folks,

    a general enquiry can a motor vehicle drive in or be on part of a cycle track ? or is this a breach of rules of he road ? is there a fine or a penalty ?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭jrmb


    Surely there are very few cycle tracks that could even contain the average motor vehicle


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,236 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    It depends on the cycle lane. Broken white line separating it from the road: yep, cars can drive in/on it. Solid white line: nope, cars can't encroach.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 265 ✭✭billcullen1


    Dial Hard wrote: »
    It depends on the cycle lane. Broken white line separating it from the road: yep, cars can drive in/on it. Solid white line: nope, cars can't encroach.

    Would you anything that states that in writing ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,891 ✭✭✭prinzeugen


    Hi Folks,

    a general enquiry can a motor vehicle drive in or be on part of a cycle track ? or is this a breach of rules of he road ? is there a fine or a penalty ?

    The rules of the road are not law so cannot be breached. The road traffic act(s) are the law.

    As posted already, broken line yes, solid line no unless for access to a driveway etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭NUTLEY BOY


    Would you anything that states that in writing ?

    Where a bicycle lane is delineated by a continuous white line you will usually find a time plate indicating the operative hours of that lane.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,170 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    RRM 022 - Solid line = No driving, no parking bar goods vehicles for 30 mins
    RRM 023 - Dashed line = no parking bar goods vehicles for 30 mins, driving in IS OK

    Within Dublin City Council's area there are bye laws that make this slightly more nuanced.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,644 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    Many roads I drive on I have no choice but to drive in a cycle lane whether broken line or not.

    Vehicles don't fit inside the actual traffic lanes in many places also.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Twenty Grand


    Many roads I drive on I have no choice but to drive in a cycle lane whether broken line or not.

    Vehicles don't fit inside the actual traffic lanes in many places also.

    In many places the cycle lanes were added retrospectively, so the actual car lanes just got narrower.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    ED E wrote: »
    RRM 022 - Solid line = No driving, no parking bar goods vehicles for 30 mins
    RRM 023 - Dashed line = no parking bar goods vehicles for 30 mins, driving in IS OK

    Within Dublin City Council's area there are bye laws that make this slightly more nuanced.

    Loading in RRM 022 is not permitted. Parking restrictions for cycle lanes is via Ministerial Regulation, not local authority bye-laws.

    The appropriate laws as requested by the OP:-
    Cycle tracks

    14. (1) A cycle track shall be indicated by—

    (a) traffic sign number RUS 009 (with-flow cycle track) provided in association with traffic sign number RRM 022 (continuous white line) or RRM 023 (broken white line) which latter signs may be marked on the right hand edge of the cycle track or on the right hand and left hand edges of the cycle track,

    (b) traffic sign number RUS 059 (contra-flow cycle track) provided in association with traffic sign number RRM 022 (continuous white line) which may be marked on the right hand edge of the cycle track or on the left hand edge of the cycle track or on both sides, or

    (c) traffic sign number RUS 058 (shared track for pedal cycles and pedestrians).

    (2) The periods of operation of a cycle track may be indicated on an information plate which may be provided in association with traffic sign number RUS 009, RUS 059 or RUS 058.

    (3) Where a cycle track, provided by traffic sign number RUS 009 in association with traffic sign number RRM 022 (continuous white line) or RRM 023 (broken white line), is two-way, pedal cycles shall be driven as near as possible to the left hand side of each lane.

    (4)(a) A pedal cycle shall be driven on a cycle track that is on—

    (i) a road,

    (ii) a portion of a road, or

    (iii) an area,

    at the entrance to which traffic sign number RUS 021 (pedestrianised street or area) is provided.

    (b) A pedal cycle shall be driven on a cycle track at the entrance to which traffic sign number RUS 059 (contra-flow cycle track) is provided and pedal cycles shall only be driven in the direction indicated by the contra-flow cycle track.

    (5)(a) A mechanically propelled vehicle, other than a mechanically propelled wheelchair, shall not be driven along or across a cycle track on the right hand edge of which traffic sign number RRM 022 has been provided, save for the purposes of access to or egress from a place adjacent to the cycle track or from a roadway to such a place.

    (b) A reference in paragraph (a) to driving along or across a cycle track shall include a reference to driving wholly or partly along or across a cycle track.

    (6) Where a vehicle is parked on that part of a road in relation to which traffic sign number RUS 009 is provided in association with traffic sign number RRM 022 or RRM 023 or traffic sign number RUS 059 is provided in association with traffic sign number RRM 022 or at a place where traffic sign number RUS 058 is provided, in advance of the commencement of the period indicated on an information plate which may accompany traffic sign number RUS 009, RUS 059 or RUS 058, the parking of the said vehicle shall cease and the vehicle shall be removed from that part of the road prior to the commencement of that period save where article 5(5) applies.


    (7)(a) A shared track shall be indicated by the provision of traffic sign number RUS 058 (shared track for pedal cycles and pedestrians) and the design displayed on the particular traffic sign number RUS 058 that is provided will indicate if the shared track is a non-segregated track where there is no visual or physical segregation of use between pedestrians and persons driving pedal cycles or if the shared track is a segregated track with a continuous white line on the track or a barrier provided along the length of the track signifying a separate area for use by persons driving pedal cycles and an adjoining separate area for use by pedestrians.

    (b) At a location where traffic sign number RUS 058 indicates that a shared track is non-segregated, as described in paragraph (a), pedestrians and persons driving pedal cycles may use that track.

    (c) At a location where traffic sign number RUS 058 indicates that a shared track is segregated, as described in paragraph (a), persons driving pedal cycles shall only use the area of the track that is designated on the sign for use by them and pedestrians shall only use the area of the track that is designated on the sign for use by them.

    (d) A mechanically propelled vehicle, other than a mechanically propelled wheelchair, shall not be driven along or across a shared track where traffic sign number RUS 058 is provided, save for the purposes of access to or egress from a place adjacent to the shared track or from a roadway to such a place.

    (e) A reference in paragraph (d) to driving along or across a shared track shall include a reference to driving wholly or partly along or across a shared track.

    (f) The end of a prohibition or of a restriction under this sub-article shall be indicated by the provision of traffic sign number RUS 058 accompanied by an information plate specifying the word ‘Críoch/END’.

    (g) In this sub-article, ‘pedestrians’ includes any person using a wheelchair, mechanically propelled, or otherwise.

    Note S14(6) provides the exemption on parking as per S5(5) for loading, but it only applies to the shared (broken) RRM 023 cycle track:-
    Non-application of certain Prohibitions and Restrictions

    5.(5) A prohibition on the parking of a vehicle imposed by article 36 (2) (m) shall not apply to a vehicle parked in a cycle track, on the right hand edge of which traffic sign number RRM 023 has been provided, while goods are being loaded in or on to it or unloaded from it for a period not exceeding thirty minutes from the commencement of such parking.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,556 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    In mandatory cycle lane - designated by RRM022, solid line - motorised vehicles are not allowed in. That includes squeezing past on the left of right turning vehicles Clonskeagh Road drivers!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,906 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    Many roads I drive on I have no choice but to drive in a cycle lane whether broken line or not.

    Vehicles don't fit inside the actual traffic lanes in many places also.

    Wainsfort road near templeogue is exactly like this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,170 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    mfceiling wrote: »
    Wainsfort road near templeogue is exactly like this.

    Thats an "advisory" - it basically doesn't exist. Classic SDCC. Their area is full of em.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,170 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    GM228 wrote: »
    Loading in RRM 022 is not permitted. Parking restrictions for cycle lanes is via Ministerial Regulation, not local authority bye-laws.

    The appropriate laws as requested by the OP:-
    [#]
    Note S14(6) provides the exemption on parking as per S5(5) for loading, but it only applies to the shared (broken) RRM 023 cycle track:-

    Just to clarify, has S.I. No. 182/1986 and similar been revoked?


    To your second point, totally correct. This is why you're such a useful poster to have around :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    If the cycle lane is on the path it's probably safe to say no ,you cant :)

    But then, you'll probably find that's the safest place to dive if you want to avoid running over cyclists cos they'll all be on the road .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,760 ✭✭✭Effects


    But then, you'll probably find that's the safest place to drive if you want to avoid running over cyclists cos they'll all be on the road .

    The drivers will probably end up on the cycle path anyway as they'll all be driving drunk and have their heads buried in their phones.

    Mod
    Ah now, be fair. pls


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    ED E wrote: »
    Just to clarify, has S.I. No. 182/1986 and similar been revoked?

    In part, for example only S20 to S26, S28 to S30, S32, S33 and S35 to S40 of the 1986 bye-laws are still in force.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,170 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    GM228 wrote: »
    In part, for example only S20 to S26, S28 to S30, S32, S33 and S35 to S40 of the 1986 bye-laws are still in force.

    As a lay person its a bit of head melter in terms of readability. Though even the RSA struggle so its not just me.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,242 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    ED E wrote: »
    As a lay person its a bit of head melter in terms of readability. Though even the RSA struggle so its not just me.
    In fairness, the RSA's knowledge of the law is demonstratably poor!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,906 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    ED E wrote: »
    Thats an "advisory" - it basically doesn't exist. Classic SDCC. Their area is full of em.

    But the cycle lanes are clearly marked and a separate colour. I presume there's no issue in having a wheel in them seeing as the driving lanes aren't wide enough for 2 vehicles to pass?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    mfceiling wrote: »
    But the cycle lanes are clearly marked and a separate colour. I presume there's no issue in having a wheel in them seeing as the driving lanes aren't wide enough for 2 vehicles to pass?

    It does not matter if they are a different colour, what is important is if there is a solid or broken white line separating them, they have a broken white line and so are shared cycle lanes and so yes you can enter them.


Advertisement