Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Near miss?

  • 19-01-2019 12:54am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,763 ✭✭✭✭


    I was flying on Ryanair from Bucharest today in a window seat on the left side of the plane, at about 13:55 Irish time about half way into the flight, another plane came from the south at the same altitude and turned East to avoid us as we flew west towards Dublin. I have never seen a plane so close at cruising altitude, I would estimate our separation was about 500m as I had a very clear view and could clearly see the plane pass very close by. Is there anywhere I can check to see if this constituted a near miss? It certainly looked dangerously close imo.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭GBX


    Inquitus wrote: »
    I was flying on Ryanair from Bucharest today in a window seat on the left side of the plane, at about 13:55 Irish time about half way into the flight, another plane came from the south at the same altitude and turned East to avoid us as we flew west towards Dublin. I have never seen a plane so close at cruising altitude, I would estimate our separation was about 500m as I had a very clear view and could clearly see the plane pass very close by. Is there anywhere I can check to see if this constituted a near miss? It certainly looked dangerously close imo.

    If probably seemed close but in reality the systems used would have warned each aircraft they were close if they were actually within that proximity to each other. Also its harder to judge distance at altitude when you've only got clouds as reference points so in reality they were probably a lot further than 500m apart.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,763 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    GBX wrote: »
    If probably seemed close but in reality the systems used would have warned each aircraft they were close if they were actually within that proximity to each other. Also its harder to judge distance at altitude when you've only got clouds as reference points so in reality they were probably a lot further than 500m apart.

    I could have seen people through the windows but for the closing speed, it was really that close.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,685 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Does FlightRadar24 not show this kind of data?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,514 ✭✭✭TheChizler


    There was another Ryanair flight on FR24 going NE to Berlin that passed under you by 1000 ft at 35,000 ft around then. Normal occurrence though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭faoiarvok


    Inquitus wrote: »
    I was flying on Ryanair from Bucharest today in a window seat on the left side of the plane, at about 13:55 Irish time about half way into the flight, another plane came from the south at the same altitude and turned East to avoid us as we flew west towards Dublin. I have never seen a plane so close at cruising altitude, I would estimate our separation was about 500m as I had a very clear view and could clearly see the plane pass very close by. Is there anywhere I can check to see if this constituted a near miss? It certainly looked dangerously close imo.

    You would not get that close at the same level without TCAS instructing the pilots to climb and descend. TCAS does not issue turns to avoid traffic.

    The required vertical separation is 1000ft which is less than your estimate of 500m.

    It almost certainly was not.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭faoiarvok


    TheChizler wrote: »
    There was another Ryanair flight on FR24 going NE to Berlin that passed under you by 1000 ft at 35,000 ft around then. Normal occurrence though.

    aFrNnPF.png

    FR2034 Toulouse to Berlin Schonefeld, 1000ft below.

    WMPFR0o.png

    It did take a turn as you converged, most likely as part of its planned route, because you had the required separation already.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,763 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    Thanks for the answers, 1000ft is only 300m, I'd say the additional non vertical separation was even less, certainly the closest I have even seen 2 planes come together at 30,000+ ft. But all above board I see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,618 ✭✭✭IngazZagni


    Inquitus wrote: »
    Thanks for the answers, 1000ft is only 300m, I'd say the additional non vertical separation was even less, certainly the closest I have even seen 2 planes come together at 30,000+ ft. But all above board I see.

    Once the aircraft are 1000 feet apart vertically there is no horizontal distance separation requirement.
    Happens thousands of times a day.

    Try having an A380 flying 1000 feet below. Now that's a cool sight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 531 ✭✭✭Candamir


    IngazZagni wrote: »

    Try having an A380 flying 1000 feet below. Now that's a cool sight.

    An A380 1000ft above however, is not!!


    http://m.aviationweek.com/business-aviation/german-challenger-totaled-after-a380-wake-turbulence


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    An A380 1000ft above however, is not!!
    It most certainly is a cool sight until about 10-15 seconds later.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭theguzman


    Candamir wrote: »

    That was a seriously close call.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    I’m not too sure how much of the blame should go to the A380, the flight data recorder appears to show that the challenger pilot used the wrong foot to attempt to recover


Advertisement