Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Beeching Hedging

  • 01-11-2018 2:24pm
    #1
    underpants
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭


    I'm looking to plant 300m of beech hedging as a border to a property and I've got quotes for doing it with 3-4ft or with 4-5ft.

    The 4-5ft is coming in about 65% more than 3-4ft. My questions are...

    - Is that price justifiable?
    - Is the risk that 3-4ft will fail that much high than 4-5ft?
    - Or is the only issue that it will take longer for 3-4ft to grow and fill out?

    Any advice or your experience would be good to hear

    Thanks


Comments

  • #2
    blackbox
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,715 ✭✭✭blackbox


    underpants wrote: »
    I'm looking to plant 300m of beech hedging as a border to a property and I've got quotes for doing it with 3-4ft or with 4-5ft.

    The 4-5ft is coming in about 65% more than 3-4ft. My questions are...

    - Is that price justifiable?
    - Is the risk that 3-4ft will fail that much high than 4-5ft?
    - Or is the only issue that it will take longer for 3-4ft to grow and fill out?

    Any advice or your experience would be good to hear

    Thanks

    3-4 ft is LESS likely to fail and will probably fill out better. Unless you have something that you need to hide immediately it's a no brainier.


  • #3
    standardg60
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,187 ✭✭✭standardg60


    blackbox wrote: »
    3-4 ft is LESS likely to fail and will probably fill out better. Unless you have something that you need to hide immediately it's a no brainier.

    completely agree


  • #4
    pwurple
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,449 ✭✭✭✭pwurple


    Are they the same spacing and density? How many plants for your space? Unusual for there to be that price difference.

    Bare root or pots?


  • #5
    Hoof Hearted2
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭Hoof Hearted2


    underpants wrote: »
    I'm looking to plant 300m of beech hedging as a border to a property and I've got quotes for doing it with 3-4ft or with 4-5ft.

    The 4-5ft is coming in about 65% more than 3-4ft. My questions are...

    - Is that price justifiable?Only you can be the judge of that, but if you can afford it then IMO yes it is, because the larger plants are roughly 2 years older and essentially you have an instant hedge.

    - Is the risk that 3-4ft will fail that much high than 4-5ft? No there is no discernible difference in the risk, bare root hedging has roughly a 10% failure rate, but IME in the vast majority of cases the success rate is 100%, providing the work is carried out to best industry practice.

    - Or is the only issue that it will take longer for 3-4ft to grow and fill out? Yes essentially that is the only difference, the difference in height equates to about 2 years.

    Any advice or your experience would be good to hear

    Thanks
    Hope that helps.


Advertisement