Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What is your opinion on this

  • 15-10-2018 10:22pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 118 ✭✭



    Uou think he has some good points ?
    Or is he like that Depak Chopra guy and is using people's lack of understanding to spout pseudo science bollocks ?

    From what I understand about quantum physics - this whole uncertainty is at the atomic level - not the macroscopic level - so that alone tells me this is bollocks.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,457 ✭✭✭Morbert


    Quantum mechanics is certainly at odds with our classical intuitions, and there's plenty of examples of quantum phenomena that make us utter "woah! weird!".

    But (contrary to what the speaker implies) quantum mechanics isn't some dialectic mass of contradictions. Like classical physics, it is a consistent theory with equations that describe regularities in what we observe.

    But but quantum mechanical descriptions of reality are typically in the context of observations. If we try to interpret a quantum mechanical description of reality independent from some observational context, we may end up with either a multiplicity of worlds ( https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-manyworlds/ ) or a multiplicity of descriptions which, if combined, contradict one another ( https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-consistent-histories/ ).

    The video is woo, but not quite Chopra woo.


Advertisement