Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Virgin Media vs SIRO

  • 17-09-2018 12:25pm
    #1
    flexcon
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,633 ✭✭✭


    Hey guys,

    Looking for some discussion or help in this topic

    Living in Cork City with Virgin Media 240 package.

    When Siro becomes available, we would look at going with the equivalent package.However, on a technical level, is there any difference?
    On a real world answer would we notice any difference between Virgin broadband or Siro? both appear to be FTH.

    There are 6 people in the house currently.


Comments

  • #2
    ED E
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,170 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    If its actually virgin FTTH then the differences would be minimal. Virgin FTTH is rare as of yet in Ireland though and lots is "fibre powered" EURODOCSIS or internet over TV cable. In that comparison SIRO would be significantly better for gamers but practically on par for average users.


  • #3
    flexcon
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,633 ✭✭✭flexcon


    ED E wrote: »
    If its actually virgin FTTH then the differences would be minimal. Virgin FTTH is rare as of yet in Ireland though and lots is "fibre powered" EURODOCSIS or internet over TV cable. In that comparison SIRO would be significantly better for gamers but practically on par for average users.

    ah yes this explains where I was hitting a brick wall when comparing.

    So in reality, Virgin is still using the cable system. If this were the case, I am right in saying it should floor the ping times to single digits? That being the main draw to switch...?


  • #4
    ED E
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,170 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Yeah, lower latency. Additionally virgin are clinging to hardware that spikes to 150ms latency every 90s despite knowing its flawed. Long term this will likely change but the current comparison is a stable 9-12ms vs 20ms that spikes constantly to 150ms. Sub par.

    For many the TV product will be the decider.


  • #5
    flexcon
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,633 ✭✭✭flexcon


    ED E wrote: »
    Yeah, lower latency. Additionally virgin are clinging to hardware that spikes to 150ms latency every 90s despite knowing its flawed. Long term this will likely change but the current comparison is a stable 9-12ms vs 20ms that spikes constantly to 150ms. Sub par.

    For many the TV product will be the decider.

    This has been amazing. Thank you, 100% will go for the Siro then. No one watching cable Tv except for some IPTV streams for Croatian and spanish channels.


Advertisement