Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2 seperate connection to public sewer(Domestic House)

  • 05-09-2018 8:50am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 430 ✭✭


    Simple square site, with the public sewer running across the front in line with the curb.
    What are the chances of being allowed to connect twice (to keep runs straight and simple)
    one run on each side of the house to the sewer system, otherwise, I have to connect one pipe to the other across the front of the house(not the end of the world)

    Fingal county council are a great bunch of lads..:P


Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    magnethead wrote: »
    Simple square site, with the public sewer running across the front in line with the curb.
    What are the chances of being allowed to connect twice (to keep runs straight and simple)
    one run on each side of the house to the sewer system, otherwise, I have to connect one pipe to the other across the front of the house(not the end of the world)

    Fingal county council are a great bunch of lads..:P

    Cant understand any reason why you or the council would want 2 connection to the same main line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭rayjdav


    Irish Water will not permit it for a single domestic unit. You would want a VERY good reason for it as they will see it as possible future uncontrolled connection. If by whatever reason they did, you know you will be charged twice for the connection and it is not cheap...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 430 ✭✭magnethead


    Thanks for the reply
    I'll stick up a drawing later, but there are two runs on each side of the house, coming down towards the sewer and I just thought it would make sense to keep my shi% straight and avoid any issue, since the line, is perpendicular to the house front.

    Otherwise, I will have to divert one of these straight runs 13 Meters across the face of the house to meet the other, before taking the plunge. (not the end of the world as I said)

    Just off the phone to the new quango, They said they would charge double :) and it would need two separate applications.
    one connection only, is probably the only drop-down option on their software system and they can't choose anything else ;p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭rayjdav


    But this is why sewers are laid at a gradient, allowing for the existing invert at the mains back to the furthest onsite connection. There should not an issue and the normal way it is done..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 430 ✭✭magnethead


    Of Course Ray, but it's always good if you minimize the changes in direction (limits AJ's for one).
    I am planning on dropping some submarines into this system, and I was worried about floatability with a 1:100 fall... maybe I should eat more vEG


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,888 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    magnethead wrote: »
    Of Course Ray, but it's always good if you minimize the changes in direction (limits AJ's for one).
    I am planning on dropping some submarines into this system, and I was worried about floatability with a 1:100 fall... maybe I should eat more vEG

    Or maybe all of your own shi% as you describe it, you would need no connection.

    No need to be rude to folk here trying to help.
    Neither is there any need to disparage IW and FCC: it shows a complete lack of personal integrity.

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 430 ✭✭magnethead


    Hold on a second, where was I being rude to someone? I was agreeing with Ray and then taking the piss out of myself, I think you read my post wrong.

    and I take issue, with your remark about 'no need to disparage FCC(and the rebranded IW section)' , yes there is, I dealt with them for 2 years!! Don't get me started ;p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 384 ✭✭mrbrianj


    2 separate connections will work out extremely expensive compared to merging both runs inside the boundary. "Usually" there'd be a manhole / IC required before the mains connection anyway. (meaning of "usually" can change from councils/people/sites etc;))

    In this case its probably better to get all your sh% together than getting it straight!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 430 ✭✭magnethead


    ok Brian :) Looks like it'll be a combination job, I was just throwing the Idea out there, since I've no experience with building yet.. Planning to start soon, Engineer is breaking my heart, dragging his feet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79 ✭✭dusteeroads


    magnethead wrote: »
    Otherwise, I will have to divert one of these straight runs 13 Meters across the face of the house to meet the other, before taking the plunge. (not the end of the world as I said)

    that is the usual thing to do - because
    magnethead wrote: »
    Just off the phone to the new quango, They said they would charge double :) and it would need two separate applications.
    one connection only, is probably the only drop-down option on their software system and they can't choose anything else ;p


  • Advertisement
Advertisement