Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Advice on new trailing shoe slurry tank.

  • 29-07-2018 7:25pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12


    Hey, new here first time posting so forgive me if I make any mistakes!

    We have a 6620 as our main tractor, round 125 hp and it handles 2000gal tank with big wheels no bother. But I'm will be up grading to trailing shoe. Thinking of going 2500 or 2700(if I'm brave enough) with the view being I'll upgrade to 150hp tractor down the line.

    Will the trailing shoe take a lot more power to drive?
    Which make is the best from a user point of. Eg number of spools to operate it.
    Also there's an option for an 8inch auto fill. Speeds up filling.
    I honestly don't know what to chose so looking for your advice as this will be a tank that will probably see me out and I would to like to get it right re the spec

    Thanks you for reading


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,172 ✭✭✭SuperTortoise


    Has anyone priced them lately?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭grange mac


    Has anyone priced them lately?

    Joskin is Mercedes of them only 52k...think Abbey same system at 36k....get some advice on choppers in them...inflow & outflows...esp how to clear blockages....some of them a disaster to clear if they get blocked with grass...hence optional inflow choppers. Dyor.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,753 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    Welcome to boards.
    Hi-spec was in or around 45k, depending on options, at grass and muck. Bomech make the trailing shoes for them. There's a fair oil flow needed to work the chopper, maybe 40L per minute, not 100% sure on that figure though.

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 786 ✭✭✭Cattlepen


    Have you much slurry to spread?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12 Johndeere6620


    Cattlepen wrote: »
    Have you much slurry to spread?

    Maybe 200000 gals of slurry at a guess with dairy washings included.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12 Johndeere6620


    At the moment I'm leaning very much to the Conor tank. 2500 gal. Seems to be competitive. Can't seem to find anyone local running a bigger tank on a single axle. Also most new tankers are Conor so don't have any feed back on other makes.

    This is because the next nearest dealer is 30miles away selling different makes.

    Also happened to price a trade in the 6620....it's mega money to upgrade


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7 boherboy


    Hi there john deere 6620

    My brother in law has just taken delivery of a new major 2600 trailing shoe, it has a in and out chopper it takes 3 spools plus a couple return and load sensing fittings to operate, the biggest thing he says about it is the weight of tractor in front of it to pull it safely when full and to make sure to get the double chopper or your heart will be broke from blockages.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,274 ✭✭✭orm0nd


    At the moment I'm leaning very much to the Conor tank. 2500 gal. Seems to be competitive. Can't seem to find anyone local running a bigger tank on a single axle. Also most new tankers are Conor so don't have any feed back on other makes.

    This is because the next nearest dealer is 30miles away selling different makes.

    Also happened to price a trade in the 6620....it's mega money to upgrade

    All I see about Conor is that very few people buy off them the second time. 2 local contractors bought new Conor tanks a few years back. They didn't keep the tanks too long 1 bought a major and the other bought an Abbey


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7 boherboy


    Hi there john deere 6620

    My brother in law has just taken delivery of a new major 2600 trailing shoe, it has a in and out chopper it takes 3 spools plus a couple return and load sensing fittings to operate, the biggest thing he says about it is the weight of tractor in front of it to pull it safely when full and to make sure to get the double chopper or your heart will be broke from blockages.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 445 ✭✭rs8


    Drove a abbey (25000g) a few times on a tm 140!! Drove it no problem was the normal masarator and was very easy drive, oil pressure was turned down very low and still putting out slurry!! 3 spools needed!! Wrost case you will have to get your tractor chipped and a front set of weights!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12 Johndeere6620


    rs8 wrote: »
    Drove a abbey (25000g) a few times on a tm 140!! Drove it no problem was the normal masarator and was very easy drive, oil pressure was turned down very low and still putting out slurry!! 3 spools needed!! Wrost case you will have to get your tractor chipped and a front set of weights!!

    I could keep the 6620 and buy a Tm 155 (cheap one) and spend money on it as I need to as in when it breaks down. Might be a better option.

    Is it easy the put on and take off the trailing shoe? Abbey are probably the best tank but the price I've heard for them is kinda ruling them out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12 Johndeere6620


    boherboy wrote: »
    Hi there john deere 6620

    My brother in law has just taken delivery of a new major 2600 trailing shoe, it has a in and out chopper it takes 3 spools plus a couple return and load sensing fittings to operate, the biggest thing he says about it is the weight of tractor in front of it to pull it safely when full and to make sure to get the double chopper or your heart will be broke from blockages.

    I could buy a full set of weights for the 6620 for the moment. Is he happy with tank. Is it the alpine range? I really like the major tank.

    If going 2600 I might as well go 2750. Would filling the tank to around the 2000 mark be a runner if ground conditions are far from ideal.

    Is taking on and off the trailing shoe easy? To reduce weight in the spring time?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 445 ✭✭rs8


    I could keep the 6620 and buy a Tm 155 (cheap one) and spend money on it as I need to as in when it breaks down. Might be a better option.

    Is it easy the put on and take off the trailing shoe? Abbey are probably the best tank but the price I've heard for them is kinda ruling them out.

    Yea well buying another tractor thats all going to depend on your own set up ... !! Yes never seen it done but boss said 15 mins (he runs it on the pipe system when the main one comes under pressure) but it doesnt look very heavy to be honest if you were going to get stuck i couldnt see it being the little diffrence


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,471 ✭✭✭Panch18


    Are you talking single or tandem axle?

    I think once you get to 2,500 or above you need to be lookin at tandem

    Also bear in mind the new trailer regulations. Would you be compliant on 2750 on a single axle? Would you be in the future?

    If doing road work tandem would be way better, and easier for the 6620 to handle it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12 Johndeere6620


    Panch18 wrote: »
    Are you talking single or tandem axle?

    I think once you get to 2,500 or above you need to be lookin at tandem

    Also bear in mind the new trailer regulations. Would you be compliant on 2750 on a single axle? Would you be in the future?

    If doing road work tandem would be way better, and easier for the 6620 to handle it

    Single axle I think tandem is a mighty job for rd work but I don't do more than 2miles and the extra axle in a wet spring would make it hard to handle.

    Think slurry tankers are exempt from trailer regs re weight on one axle. I don't see that changing and if it does it's going to be every tank made after a certain date


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12 Johndeere6620


    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q6AtQdCVt0k

    New abbey tank. Think he says in the clip the tyres are 900R32

    Is that 36inch in old money. That's a massive tyre under a tank and one I didnt know you could get for them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12 Johndeere6620


    rs8 wrote: »
    Yea well buying another tractor thats all going to depend on your own set up ... !! Yes never seen it done but boss said 15 mins (he runs it on the pipe system when the main one comes under pressure) but it doesnt look very heavy to be honest if you were going to get stuck i couldnt see it being the little diffrence

    I guess the safest place for it is on the tank. Thanks for your input:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12 Johndeere6620


    Just to update I will be retro fitting a dribble bar to my existing tank. The trade in was poor and my curremt tank is galv so will do me for another few years. Save money and upgrade the tractor is what I've settled on. And get contractor in for the covering the silage grd after first cut. Thanks for all the input!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,471 ✭✭✭Panch18


    Just to update I will be retro fitting a dribble bar to my existing tank. The trade in was poor and my curremt tank is galv so will do me for another few years. Save money and upgrade the tractor is what I've settled on. And get contractor in for the covering the silage grd after first cut. Thanks for all the input!

    We’ll need a thread on the tractor upgrade now!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 352 ✭✭Snowfire


    Just to update I will be retro fitting a dribble bar to my existing tank. The trade in was poor and my curremt tank is galv so will do me for another few years. Save money and upgrade the tractor is what I've settled on. And get contractor in for the covering the silage grd after first cut. Thanks for all the input!

    What weight will the dribble bar add to the tanker,? What price?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,545 ✭✭✭✭Reggie.


    Snowfire wrote: »
    What weight will the dribble bar add to the tanker,? What price?

    I think they add 600kg to the tanker.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 476 ✭✭Keep Sluicing


    Reggie. wrote: »
    I think they add 600kg to the tanker.

    Did i hear that a trailing shoe adds 1.5 ton. Depends on the width obviously, but if it right, its a right bit extra.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,545 ✭✭✭✭Reggie.


    Did i hear that a trailing shoe adds 1.5 ton. Depends on the width obviously, but if it right, its a right bit extra.

    I think the dribble bar is 600 but the injection kit is heavier. Could be wrong tho


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,556 ✭✭✭simx


    Reggie. wrote: »
    I think they add 600kg to the tanker.

    800kg one is here 7m


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,545 ✭✭✭✭Reggie.


    simx wrote: »
    800kg one is here 7m

    I'm a little off it seems


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,556 ✭✭✭simx


    Reggie. wrote: »
    I'm a little off it seems

    Think the one on the major is fairly heavy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,545 ✭✭✭✭Reggie.


    simx wrote: »
    Think the one on the major is fairly heavy

    Do these things knock off the balance of a tanker. Less weight on the tractor rear wheels


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,556 ✭✭✭simx


    Reggie. wrote: »
    Do these things knock off the balance of a tanker. Less weight on the tractor rear wheels

    The axle is back a bit further, would bounce a bit when empty, pulling it with 90hp


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,190 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    Reggie. wrote: »
    I'm a little off it seems

    Put a Mastek dribble bar on tanker during summer.... By all accounts 450kgs is the weight of it....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 116 ✭✭grizzlyadams


    Reggie. wrote: »
    I'm a little off it seems

    Put a Mastek dribble bar on tanker during summer.... By all accounts 450kgs is the weight of it....
    Thinking of doing the same here , what did it cost and what size did you go with , have a 2100 here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,842 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    What kinda weight/power would ya need to pull and control a 2100/2600 tanker full and with the extra weight of a dribble bar or shoe?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,545 ✭✭✭✭Reggie.


    What kinda weight/power would ya need to pull and control a 2100/2600 tanker full and with the extra weight of a dribble bar or shoe?

    I'd say your fendt would have no bother


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 711 ✭✭✭bamayang


    Off topic, wouldnt you imagine someone would come up with a farmer-aimed version of the umbilical system. The negatives would be, you would need two tractors and two men to operate it. But going by this forum, seems an awful lot of lads have two tractos and a lot are operating with their fathers.
    Could you have a couple of lines of piping left in place going out along to two or 3 directions of the farm, and then join or bridge in wherrever you are planning on spreading. You'd spread land in about 20% of the time (not travelling in and out to refill) and you'd do a fraction of the damage to the ground.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,044 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    bamayang wrote: »
    Off topic, wouldnt you imagine someone would come up with a farmer-aimed version of the umbilical system. The negatives would be, you would need two tractors and two men to operate it. But going by this forum, seems an awful lot of lads have two tractos and a lot are operating with their fathers.
    Could you have a couple of lines of piping left in place going out along to two or 3 directions of the farm, and then join or bridge in wherrever you are planning on spreading. You'd spread land in about 20% of the time (not travelling in and out to refill) and you'd do a fraction of the damage to the ground.

    You can buy static engine driven slurry pumps that you put at the tank and then use your tractor out in field moving the pipe around.

    I've also heard of farmers burying permanent slurry pipes from the tanks out to the fields with join stations coming up out of the ground to just hook up a short umbilical.
    There's a few farmers now with that system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,190 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    bamayang wrote: »
    Off topic, wouldnt you imagine someone would come up with a farmer-aimed version of the umbilical system. The negatives would be, you would need two tractors and two men to operate it. But going by this forum, seems an awful lot of lads have two tractos and a lot are operating with their fathers.
    Could you have a couple of lines of piping left in place going out along to two or 3 directions of the farm, and then join or bridge in wherrever you are planning on spreading. You'd spread land in about 20% of the time (not travelling in and out to refill) and you'd do a fraction of the damage to the ground.[/quot

    Tom Browne in killeagh has a set up like that.... Ud want serious acreage to justify it....

    MASTEK dribble bar contractor version which is the one we got was 12,900inc Vat and it went onto our 2250 Abbey tanker.... Very happy wit it... If ur buying get the contractor version....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,545 ✭✭✭✭Reggie.


    Bloody dribble bars are the price of the tankers themselves


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,556 ✭✭✭simx


    What kinda weight/power would ya need to pull and control a 2100/2600 tanker full and with the extra weight of a dribble bar or shoe?

    Prob 120/140 ideally, pulling a 2000 gallon with a shoe here with 90hp and it’s working but lacking here and there alright, bigger tractor is on the cards and a loader threw on current one is the future plan


Advertisement