Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Artificial pigmentation of your skin

  • 07-06-2018 4:20am
    #1
    the_syco
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,316 ✭✭✭✭


    Looking at
    https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-discovered-a-chemical-that-causes-any-skin-type-to-tan (which I read)
    brought me to
    https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(17)30684-8 (which I skimmed, but stopped when it got really scientific).

    As someone who doesn't tan well, this interests me. I note it's from a year ago, and wondering if anyone here has read about it? My field isn't biology, so although hopeful, I realise that it'll probably be a while before this is available for the public (although it'll probably be costly).

    So I'm wondering; is this a load of nonsense, or would this be able to be done? Seems the delay is that human skin is tougher than rodent skin, bu I wonder if they have progressed to human trials yet?


Comments

  • #2
    CramCycle
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,531 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    the_syco wrote: »

    So I'm wondering; is this a load of nonsense, or would this be able to be done? Seems the delay is that human skin is tougher than rodent skin, bu I wonder if they have progressed to human trials yet?

    I could be misreading it but it looks like they are taking the idea of working around the gene issues and boosting production through another pathway.

    It certainly looks plausible but I imagine it is 10 years away at least as it looks like early stage research, so they will have to go through all the other phases if this looks promising.


Advertisement