Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

NEVS - The new Saab

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,402 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    The continuation of the Saab 9-3 was only ever planned as an EV iirc. But plans seemed dormant for years. Hope this works out. The Chinese are extremely serious about making all transport EV. I wouldn't be surprised if 80% of the worlds EVs were made in China 10 years from now.

    Lotus Elan turbo for sale:

    https://www.adverts.ie/vehicles/lotus-elan-turbo/35456469

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,606 ✭✭✭Arthur Daley


    So this won't even do 90mph or 140km/h. Oh well. I'd like to see SAAB back in some form, but not sure the old 9-3 is the most up to date product now. They put a fair amount into the 9-5 just before they folded, and it would be a more up to date design.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Always have had a real soft spot for SAAB due to childhood memories and owned two 9-5's back some years back, one of which is still with the family and will turn 18 this year. It still drives and goes remarkably well for an old car.

    At the end of the Spyker episode the engineers had almost finished a new platform "Phoenix" which unfortunately was not designed for EVs. The work was restarted under NEVS and the Phoenix 2 will be more modular but won't be ready for quite some time.

    The 9-3 EV has a longest assembly line ever. The bodies were made in Trollhättan, Sweden and transported by train across Siberia to the assembly plant in China. The current model is a real hack but hopefully the Phoenix 2 based cars will be tasty. The current cars look really nice. Let's hope the investors continue investing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,827 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Re-hashing the same car/body from 15 years ago. Groundbreaking stuff


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,913 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I wonder if they will keep the saab quirky traditions?
    Like you must select reverse to turn on the car even in an EV. Or silly but endearing key locations as above.

    I like saabs, a neighbour of mine had an H plate (UK) saab 9000 in maroon many moons ago when it was new. Now that was a lovely car.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,955 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    road_high wrote: »
    Re-hashing the same car/body from 15 years ago. Groundbreaking stuff

    Take a picure of a 3 series 2000 and compare with a 3 series 2018....

    Most cars have not changed dramatically in the last 15 years.

    So not sure exactly what your point is?

    Which groudbreaking car are you referring to?

    Change the grill on the front of a 2018 3 series, put in red....guess what you have....a Tesla 3 :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,955 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    ELM327 wrote: »
    I wonder if they will keep the saab quirky traditions?
    Like you must select reverse to turn on the car even in an EV. Or silly but endearing key locations as above.

    I like saabs, a neighbour of mine had an H plate (UK) saab 9000 in maroon many moons ago when it was new. Now that was a lovely car.

    The one I had, another friend had exact same one didn't require you to put into reverse, that was the older models.....

    The key location was at the gear stick :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,955 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    So this won't even do 90mph or 140km/h. Oh well. I'd like to see SAAB back in some form, but not sure the old 9-3 is the most up to date product now. They put a fair amount into the 9-5 just before they folded, and it would be a more up to date design.

    Most electric cars you don't go over 100km/h because it kills the battery. Also speed limit is 120km/h so don't see the issue

    I am not sure they put in much work at all, the 9-5 was thrown together and released to try and make a few quid, that is why it failed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,402 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    ELM327 wrote: »
    neighbour of mine had an H plate (UK) saab 9000 in maroon many moons ago when it was new. Now that was a lovely car.

    Except that was a FIAT with a Saab badge :pac:

    Lotus Elan turbo for sale:

    https://www.adverts.ie/vehicles/lotus-elan-turbo/35456469

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,913 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    unkel wrote: »
    Except that was a FIAT with a Saab badge :pac:


    It did bear some semblence to the lancia of the time actually, I thought the badge engineered saabs came later - like the 9-3 and 9-5 that were essentially Opel/Vauxhall/GMs.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,988 ✭✭✭jacksie66


    This post has been deleted.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    ELM327 wrote: »
    It did bear some semblence to the lancia of the time actually, I thought the badge engineered saabs came later - like the 9-3 and 9-5 that were essentially Opel/Vauxhall/GMs.

    The 9000, Fiat Croma, Lancia Thema and Alfa 164 were a joint project between SAAB and FIAT. The doors of the first three interchange for example, but the 164 was developed further and was launched way after the rest of them. SAAB was somewhat heavier than the others due to extra passive crash protection. As a company they were responsible for the HVAC system which was very modern back in '84 with for example sunlight sensor. All three (four) cars turned out to be very different in style and you'd never guess 164 had anything in common with the others. All of the cars were mechanically and in style were different from each other and there were some quite interesting models.

    The 9-5 (as the earlier 900) are based on GM architecture but there are a very few similarities. Superficially the mirror adjustment and heated seat buttons are about the only clue. One thing about 9-5 based on personal experience is that it's quite amazing they drive so well compared to for example Vectra which always felt really stodgy in comparison. The stuff like independent rear suspension works really well in 9-5 and it's very stable and comfortable at speed. I was really surprised how well the car drove at 200 km/h plus on the trip across the continent many years ago and with simple turbo and software upgrade the 2 later engine can be quite powerful (250+ PS) but still dependable (unless you neglect them).

    Anyway, this is a little bit off topic. The NEVS doesn't really have any connection with SAAB apart from the factory and some staff. The Chinese ownership didn't do Volvo any harm so let's hope we will get to drive some stylish and quirky NEVS EVs soon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,955 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    ELM327 wrote: »
    It did bear some semblence to the lancia of the time actually, I thought the badge engineered saabs came later - like the 9-3 and 9-5 that were essentially Opel/Vauxhall/GMs.

    You didn't watch the videos did you? :p:p:p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,913 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    You didn't watch the videos did you? :p:p:p
    No I didnt... work blocked them.

    Is it the TG episode where they complain that saab took the GM chassis and spent money making a new satnav system?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,955 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    ELM327 wrote: »
    No I didnt... work blocked them.

    Is it the TG episode where they complain that saab took the GM chassis and spent money making a new satnav system?

    I wouldn't say complain, I would say they admired.....


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yea, the joke was other way around, i.e. GM had told them to take a Vectra and do some minimum changes but they ended up using just the Nav and changed pretty much everything and Clarkson etc. thought it was hilarious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,402 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    One of the best TG episodes imho. It showed that despite of the tired scripting of the show and the childish humour and lousy parts like celebrities, these guys are serious motoring journalists and genuine car enthusiasts (and have a magnificent team working with them, no expenses spared)

    Lotus Elan turbo for sale:

    https://www.adverts.ie/vehicles/lotus-elan-turbo/35456469

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,638 ✭✭✭zilog_jones


    samih wrote: »
    The 9-5 (as the earlier 900) are based on GM architecture but there are a very few similarities. Superficially the mirror adjustment and heated seat buttons are about the only clue.

    They also inherited the bulkhead failures from the Vectra :)

    This NEVS thing seems a lot like the typical Chinese car manufacturer tradition of buying old tooling and resurrecting some car we thought was long dead (like Austin Maestros being built in the early 2000s), although the reality is a bit different here. Here's hoping they'll make some newer more original/competitive products in the coming years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,606 ✭✭✭Arthur Daley


    unkel wrote: »
    One of the best TG episodes imho. It showed that despite of the tired scripting of the show and the childish humour and lousy parts like celebrities, these guys are serious motoring journalists and genuine car enthusiasts (and have a magnificent team working with them, no expenses spared)
    Indeed. And where is this tired format now. Clarkson & co. just saw it as a cash cow and money for old rope after 2005 or so. Messing around that wasn't funny when you were 13. But there is a need for someone to make programmes with general motoring stories like the demise of SAAB or Lancia, and no doubt some other marques and motoring history will go in the next ten to fifteen years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,913 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Indeed. And where is this tired format now. Clarkson & co. just saw it as a cash cow and money for old rope after 2005 or so. Messing around that wasn't funny when you were 13. But there is a need for someone to make programmes with general motoring stories like the demise of SAAB or Lancia, and no doubt some other marques and motoring history will go in the next ten to fifteen years.
    I disagree.
    Some of my favourite TG episodes (The peugeot episode "maniacs", the P45 episode) happened well after that.


    If I want a serious car review I follow several youtubers who will offer me the amount of cubic yards in the front passenger footwell of any car. TG is not a car show, it's a comedy show loosely based in cars.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,955 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    ELM327 wrote: »
    I disagree.
    Some of my favourite TG episodes (The peugeot episode "maniacs", the P45 episode) happened well after that.


    If I want a serious car review I follow several youtubers who will offer me the amount of cubic yards in the front passenger footwell of any car. TG is not a car show, it's a comedy show loosely based in cars.

    I loved the Peugeot epsiode....I was in knots laughing at it.....my wife was looking at me like I had 2 heads....no idea why now but I found it hillarious:p


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,260 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    Oh I'd buy that in a heart beat if it could be got here!

    Great looking front of the car but looks compact.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They also inherited the bulkhead failures from the Vectra :)

    That would be NG900 alright. That car was a "bit" of a rush job back in '93 but SAAB got the quality of 9-5 right from the day one 4 years later. Apart from the early inadequate breather system which caused many failed engines on 9-5 before it was redesigned and the oil specs upgraded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,402 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    They also inherited the bulkhead failures from the Vectra :)

    Nope. Not the 9-5 :)

    That also never had an Opel petrol engine as its main engine. The vast majority had the tried and trusted Saab straight 4 turbo petrol (which itself was originally sourced from Triumph in the UK in the 70s - the slant engine)

    Wait. Are we in the EV forum still? :p

    Lotus Elan turbo for sale:

    https://www.adverts.ie/vehicles/lotus-elan-turbo/35456469

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,402 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    samih wrote: »
    Apart from the early inadequate breather system which caused many failed engines on 9-5 before it was redesigned and the oil specs upgraded.

    I think it was the oil change interval too? Fully synth and down to 6k miles instead of 12k? Or is my memory becoming rusty at my old age? :)

    My '01 never gave me trouble. Lovely car, albeit not a drivers car. Bought when 10 years old for €1,350 in superb condition, sold 2 years later with a few minor issues (like alarm no longer working) for €1,250. It gave me decent family motoring for very little money during the last bit of the recession when money was extremely tight. Good memories of the car!

    Lotus Elan turbo for sale:

    https://www.adverts.ie/vehicles/lotus-elan-turbo/35456469

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,684 ✭✭✭waynegalway


    I had 2002 9-3, 2l petrol. Loved it. It was 6 years old when I got it, and I kept it (trouble free) for 4 years. Foolishly traded it for a 2007 diesel 9-3, which went brilliantly until it blew itself apart from the inside after about a year (high speed fan failed, so DPF didn’t work, eventually lead to turbo bursting). That turned me off diesel, I hadn’t even heard of a DPF until then.

    I’d love a classic SAAB, if I had to have a petrol car. When GM got involved, and diesel entered the line up, it went downhill as a brand.

    I’ll watch the EV version with interest!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,684 ✭✭✭waynegalway




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,684 ✭✭✭waynegalway




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    unkel wrote: »
    Nope. Not the 9-5 :)

    That also never had an Opel petrol engine as its main engine. The vast majority had the tried and trusted Saab straight 4 turbo petrol (which itself was originally sourced from Triumph in the UK in the 70s - the slant engine)

    Wait. Are we in the EV forum still? :p

    Yea, if you don't like engines skip this rambling about REX on SAABs. All is from top of my head so there could be small inaccuracies: Only the original 99 engine 1967-> was from actually a Triumph designed and built, first with displacement of 1.7 litre and later on enlarged to 1.85. These both were quite problematic engines due to being a half of the Triumph 90 degree V8 and the engine suffered from frequent head gasket failures due to the design relying the combined force from angled head bolts and the inlet manifold to keep the cylinder head in check, a design that didn't really work in an I4 engine. The engines were also considered underpowered at the time and rebuilding was tough as the head bolts tend to rust weld themselves in place. Finally the manual transmission was weak so bit of a disaster really.

    SAAB fixed all these major design issues with the 1972 1985cc "B" engine which superficially looked like the previous UK engines but got rid of all of the weak features and was a full in house design. This engine was later on turbocharged for MY78 before new "H" engines were introduced in 1981 that were a bit lighter and more fuel efficient and with the distributor driven directly by the camshaft. Power of these engines remained the same as the predecessor including the turbo at 100-145 PS. In 1983 a 16V head was designed (but the EMS rally car had a 16V head already back in 1977 or so on the B block) and introduced in 900 Aero generating 175 PS and 280 Nm or torque which were very competitive values in early 80's from a two litre engine. A year before that the 8V turbo had already introduced APC (Automatic Performance Control) system that allowed extra boost over the base level if no knock was detected. This maximum power of the 8V turbo was increased to 155 PS at that time.

    The 16V engine made it to the new 9000 with some modifications for transversal mounting and the gearbox moved from below the block to a "normal" place after the engine and was at some stage named B201. The 99/900 used a chain drive from crankshaft to the gearbox mounted below the block. The first 9000 engine had still the cylinder block at 45 degree angle but on newer generation 2.0 and 2.3 engines this was eventually gotten rid and eventually they introduced the B204 and B234 "long block" engines, latter being 2290cc in displacement with balancing shafts. This generation like all of the previous and future 2.0 SAAB engines were 1985cc. These late 9000 engines are the most robust engines SAAB ever made and can make up to 700 PS with standard innards and the 1985 is actually preferred due to higher obtainable rpm. These engines continued until around year 2000 on NG900/OG9-3. Before that around 1992 Trionic 5 engine management with direct ignition was introduced which was the most advanced mass produced engine management system in the world. It introduced cool stuff like using the spark plugs to detect conditions in the cylinders to detect detonation before it actually really happens.

    On the 9-5 a new family of low friction engines called EcoPower (B205/B235) was meanwhile introduced in late 1997. They are externally very similar to the 2X4 but have both lighter block and the internal components which resulted fuel consumption reduction of 10 percent or so with it's improved Trionic 7 management system. They are not nearly as tuneable as the older engines and for high power 9-5 a B234 rotating parts or a full bottom end can be used instead. The parts between the long block B series are quite interchangeable for mix and match. The red and black ignition cassettes should never be mixed as T5/T7 require different parameters for knock detection.

    The EcoPower was the last SAAB in house designed engine line before the B206/7 which were GM based (but SAAB had major input on this family of engines, especially the high output B207 used on Aero models.

    So, after this short writeup you now see that none of the SAAB engines since 1972 were Triumph and even the last trace of the the slanted configuration was discontinued with discontinuation of B201 in 1993 when production of the original 900 ceased.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,402 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    samih wrote: »
    So, after this short writeup you now see that none of the SAAB engines since 1972 were Triumph and even the last trace of the the slanted configuration was discontinued with discontinuation of B201 in 1993 when production of the original 900 ceased.

    Nice writeup! But I disagree with your conclusion. The H engine used in the Saab 9-5 until about 2010 was still a slanted straight 4 based on the Triumph half V8

    Not the only car with a setup of half of an existing V8 engine. The Porsche 968 (and the latest and greatest 944 3l S2) used half the V8 engine of the Porsche 928 :)

    Lotus Elan turbo for sale:

    https://www.adverts.ie/vehicles/lotus-elan-turbo/35456469

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    unkel wrote: »
    Nice writeup! But I disagree with your conclusion. The H engine used in the Saab 9-5 until about 2010 was still a slanted straight 4 based on the Triumph half V8

    Not the only car with a setup of half of an existing V8 engine. The Porsche 968 (and the latest and greatest 944 3l S2) used half the V8 engine of the Porsche 928 :)

    Cheers Unkel. To continue discussing about these REXes: I'm a turbo kind of person and would love to restore a 944 Turbo as a holiday vehicle but a 968 wouldn't be a bad choice either.

    Here's a comparison photos of the B201 and B2X5 to which illustrates the differences and the move from slant to plane rather well. An life is all about learning and I didn't know that the B201 was the 8V engine and B202 the 16V. Now just have to figure out B203 was, probably the 2.1 liter slant 4 that was fitted for a while in 900 in early 90's.


Advertisement