Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Headgear

  • 04-06-2018 10:34AM
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭


    How come members of the defence forces involved in searching for the mobile phone of Cameron Reilly are not wearing headgear? Is a cap not part of the uniform anymore?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    4ensic15 wrote: »
    How come members of the defence forces involved in searching for the mobile phone of Cameron Reilly are not wearing headgear? Is a cap not part of the uniform anymore?

    Yes it is.

    When engaging in manual tasks such as a search or ATCP troops can be directed to not wear head dress as it is not essential to the task. It's a practical decision, nothing more.

    Quite simple really.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,608 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    Negative_G wrote: »
    Yes it is.

    When engaging in manual tasks such as a search or ATCP troops can be directed to not wear head dress as it is not essential to the task. It's a practical decision, nothing more.

    Quite simple really.

    ^^^ This.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I understand flexibility, and the fact that a beret is, generally speaking, an all but useless piece of kit, but how is it impractical/gets in the way and worthy of dispensing with?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    I understand flexibility, and the fact that a beret is, generally speaking, an all but useless piece of kit, but how is it impractical/gets in the way and worthy of dispensing with?

    What reason would you give to direct soldiers to wear a beret while engaging in manual tasks where head dress might constantly fall off, get snagged in something or just make a person sweat even more than they are already? What purpose does it serve?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,626 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I understand flexibility, and the fact that a beret is, generally speaking, an all but useless piece of kit, but how is it impractical/gets in the way and worthy of dispensing with?

    I despise berets. If I had a choice of time traveling to take out Hitler, or the inventor of the beret, I'd be hard pressed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    The reason why armies use berets is because they are cheap to make and buy, easy to maintain and easy to replace and some units place a huge amount of pride in them. Apart from berets, the sidecap is about the next best thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    Stovepipe wrote: »
    The reason why armies use berets is because they are cheap to make and buy, easy to maintain and easy to replace and some units place a huge amount of pride in them. Apart from berets, the sidecap is about the next best thing.

    What does this have to do with the OP's question?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    The beret was mentioned. I don't know why they didn't have head gear, just some local operational order, I guess.


Advertisement