Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Another NCT emissions thread

  • 25-03-2018 11:48am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 135 ✭✭


    I had a retest on my 2006 Audi A3 1.6 petrol and it failed - I had a brand new CAT fitted last week and I also had the car tested at my local garage who has the equipment to test CO and it passed 100%

    NCT re-test this morning failed on high idle 2820 with CO at 0.40 vol% - above 0.20% and I am struggling to understand what the problem is

    No code faults - not showing any signs of oil burning - always serviced and it has 200km done -

    The tester revved the crap out of the engine doing the test and handed me a failed/refusal on the high ideal test

    Any idea where I can start to look especially as it passed emission test at my local garage

    I always use good fuel and I have put Dipetane in the odd time as recommended by a mechanic

    Feeling pretty pissed now

    Thanks in advance


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    The reason the NCT test centre revs the crap out of it the car is to heat up the cat to drop the readings. I good few years back I got into a tiny bit of an argument over that. He said you failed emissions and I said sure why wouldn't I with you revving the crap out of the engine.


    Regarding the readings these things are hard to sort as it could be a small thing best get a garage to look it over.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 135 ✭✭eskerman


    The reason the NCT test centre revs the crap out of it the car is to heat up the cat to drop the readings. I good few years back I got into a tiny bit of an argument over that. He said you failed emissions and I said sure why wouldn't I with you revving the crap out of the engine.


    Regarding the readings these things are hard to sort as it could be a small thing best get a garage to look it over.

    Thanks for your reply and opinion

    I understand the car has to be running at "normal" temperature and revving the ****e out of an engine 'off-load" would appear to be counter productive at best...

    The test garage to checked the emissions after a brand new CAT was fitted showed it passed CO with flying colours - it says the CO must meet 0.20% or less and I am getting 0.40% / the garage who tested for me didn't rev the ****e out of the engine and ran it at about 3000RPM which is the high idle speed the NCT does - well its 2800RPM

    I am going back to the garage that tested it for me and see if they can re-test and replicate what happened at NCT

    I hate wandering around in the FOG and at the mercy of test equipment or people who run the equipment - doctors differ and patients die springs to mind


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Moved out from someone else's thread


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What were the other values, i.e. the lambda and HC at high idle?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,808 ✭✭✭rizzee


    Bottle of redex/diptain and 20 quid petrol before the test!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 135 ✭✭eskerman


    samih wrote: »
    What were the other values, i.e. the lambda and HC at high idle?

    The lambda at high idle was 0.98 and it passed

    The CO was 0.40 and it should be 02 or lower

    HC WAS 103ppm and they passed

    Seems to be running rich and boring fuel and consumption is high - going to get a full diagnostics done on the car as this is really turning into a money pit

    The car has been very well maintained - always serviced using proper oils and filters .. its clearly something in the fuel trimming circuit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 135 ✭✭eskerman


    rizzee wrote: »
    Bottle of redex/diptain and 20 quid petrol before the test!!

    I would prefer to find the problem to be honest - I think additives can be a tad misleading


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    With the lambda value of 0.98 the new cat would be the last component I'd be replacing. More likely a problem with air flow meter or lambda sensor or dirty injectors etc. When was the timing belt last changed? Maybe correct locking tools were used at the time and the timing is a bit off. Does the engine like a drop of oil? There are lots of possibilities why the fuelling maybe off and stop the cat doing it's job properly.

    Take it to a good independent fuel injection workshop I'd say.

    Edit. Not burning oil as you said in the first post but there are lots of other things to check. Cat always gets the blame as it's nice and expensive and straight forward component to replace without any analysis and a brand new cat can sometimes just about mask other issues at least for once NCT. The old OEM cats are also worth a lots of money when recycled so it's a win-win to sell you one that you don't need.


Advertisement