Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

WHAT HAPPENS IF NEW HOUSE DOESN'T MEET BER

  • 21-03-2018 8:26pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭


    Hi I'm starting a new house soon and goin with oil/rads/solar and stove for heating system. We're building mortgage free and our budget is really really tight. What happens if I decided to do without the solars and stove for maybe and year and do them at a later date ?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,063 ✭✭✭UrbanFret


    Digged wrote: »
    Hi I'm starting a new house soon and goin with oil/rads/solar and stove for heating system. We're building mortgage free and our budget is really really tight. What happens if I decided to do without the solars and stove for maybe and year and do them at a later date ?


    I believe you would get a provisional ber which would be updated when the remainder of the works was carried out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    So is actually ok to do this and just do solars and stove when we have the money


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,170 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    theres some confusion here as to some terminology.

    first off, you cant "fail" or "not meet" a BER assessment.
    A BER assessment is simply assessment which produces a certificate, which is required at point of sale or rent, or before occupying a new home.

    The requirement for providing renewable energy is part of the building regulations, which is a completely different piece of legislation to the one which requires a BER to be carried out.
    The confusion occurs because its the same piece of software which checks building regulation compliance, and produces the BER cert.

    this software is called DEAP..... it has a dual purpose

    so your asking, what happens if you fail the DEAP assessment..... totally different kettle of fish.

    if you build something which doesnt comply with the building regulations, then you are breaking the law.
    building a house without providing renewable energy, which is required in a new build, is breaking the law.... totally NOT ok to do.

    its up to you to choose whether you are happy to break the law or not. No one here will say thats its ok, unless they have disdain for irish law (there are some out there who are like this)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    Ok thanks but what's the deadline on meeting these requirement ? Could I be living in the house 6 months before I fit the solars or stove ? I do intend on doing them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,717 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    The problem can be that by not complying with these requirements your architect is unlikely to give a final cert, this is likely to be a problem for the bank and they don’t like this sort of thing. And the final draw down of the mortgage may be withheld until the cert is provided.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    In fairness, nobody here is going to tell you, to break the law.
    What are you dropping, solar panels and stove? You'll have the chimney. You'll have to install a hot water cylinder ans system compatible with solar.
    What's the saving as a % of the overall build?
    Consider these questions and look at what else you might cut if needed.


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,170 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Digged wrote: »
    Ok thanks but what's the deadline on meeting these requirement ? Could I be living in the house 6 months before I fit the solars or stove ? I do intend on doing them

    Technically there's no deadline other than the completion of the house.
    If your opting out of Building control regulations, and your building without a mortgage, then its up to you to decide when completion happens.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,829 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Digged wrote: »
    Hi I'm starting a new house soon and goin with oil/rads/solar and stove for heating system. We're building mortgage free and our budget is really really tight. What happens if I decided to do without the solars and stove for maybe and year and do them at a later date ?

    Have you looked into Geothermal and air/heat recovery systems. Your building a brand new house seems crazy to put an oil boiler in it very few are doing that now. Best to look at all your options.They are not allowed have them in new housing estates anymore.

    _Brian wrote: »
    The problem can be that by not complying with these requirements your architect is unlikely to give a final cert, this is likely to be a problem for the bank and they don’t like this sort of thing. And the final draw down of the mortgage may be withheld until the cert is provided.

    The OP does not have to worry about a mortgage as they said they are mortgage free. So no bank or mortgage problems for them.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    AFAIK oil burners are banned totally on new builds in Norway and they are not short of oil.
    Maybe make the house a bit smaller and up the standard as poster above says. Many one off builds are very big anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,686 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    If you are not using a bank, You may well have no issue doing as you say however you will not be meeting the building regulations and it will be on your own head into the future.
    There is also the possibility that you will be subject to a random inspection from Building Control officer.
    If that were to happen, the Building Control officer will insist that you comply within a reasonable time frame.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    _Brian wrote:
    The problem can be that by not complying with these requirements your architect is unlikely to give a final cert, this is likely to be a problem for the bank and they don’t like this sort of thing. And the final draw down of the mortgage may be withheld until the cert is provided.


    We're building without a mortgage so that won't be an issue


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    Water John wrote:
    In fairness, nobody here is going to tell you, to break the law. What are you dropping, solar panels and stove? You'll have the chimney. You'll have to install a hot water cylinder ans system compatible with solar. What's the saving as a % of the overall build? Consider these questions and look at what else you might cut if needed.


    We are putting in cylinder compatible for solar system but I'm just asking do the solars have to be installed immediately?We would save roughly €3500 not fitting solars and stove straight away


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,769 ✭✭✭Pinch Flat


    I’d be focussing on Part L compliance rather than a ber- there’s no legal lthreshold for ber. It’s an advisory on how much energy your home will consume over a year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    mickdw wrote:
    If you are not using a bank, You may well have no issue doing as you say however you will not be meeting the building regulations and it will be on your own head into the future. There is also the possibility that you will be subject to a random inspection from Building Control officer. If that were to happen, the Building Control officer will insist that you comply within a reasonable time frame.

    Ok this is what I wanted to know. So does somebody call to site and check to see if I've met these requirements ? And if the consequences were having to install the rest that's not a big deal ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    Water John wrote:
    AFAIK oil burners are banned totally on new builds in Norway and they are not short of oil. Maybe make the house a bit smaller and up the standard as poster above says. Many one off builds are very big anyway.


    House will only be 1250sq/ft, can't go any smaller 😂. Air to water cost is €17,500 for the house and oil/rads/solar and stove is €9000. Buy a lot of oil for the €8500 difference. My brother in law built 2700sq/ft last year with oil/rads/solar and stove and he only spent €500 on oil last year. With level of insulation today houses need very little heating


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭dubrov


    Just take out as big a mortgage as you can with one of the banks that do a 2% cashback deal.
    Then pay off the balance with your savings.

    Even if the 2% doesn't cover the extra cost, you'd be left with a very low interest loan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    Pinch Flat wrote:
    I’d be focussing on Part L compliance rather than a ber- there’s no legal lthreshold for ber. It’s an advisory on how much energy your home will consume over a year.


    Well it is Part L compliance I'm trying to meet. I'm asking when does it have to be met ? Could I just use oil and rads for couple of months till I get money together for solars and then fit them ? What determines when these have to be done ? I will be doin them by the way, just if I could hold off a while it would be great. I will be mortgage free by the way so I would have money together for them soon enough


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    Banks won't give us mortgage cause were both self employed. Tried them all !!

    Only looked for 50,000 aswell

    Have another mortgage 10years and never missed a payment even thru recession. Credit rating 100 percent. SOME JOKE


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,170 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Assuming you have approx 100k cash to build your home... It's still not possible to get another 15k to compete it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    Have 100k that's including 10k from credit union, that's max they'll give us. We'll have that paid in 2 years


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,063 ✭✭✭UrbanFret


    Just go ahead with the plan and fit them when you have the necessary funds. Banks ought to be ashamed of themselves. I had the same problem. Wouldn't give me a bean. Like yourself I managed without the useless cnuts. As long as you comply within a reasonable timescale I really don't see the issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    UrbanFret wrote:
    Just go ahead with the plan and fit them when you have the necessary funds. Banks ought to be ashamed of themselves. I had the same problem. Wouldn't give me a bean. Like yourself I managed without the useless cnuts. As long as you comply within a reasonable timescale I really don't see the issue.


    I know it's unbelievable. My plan is too just do what's needed to get it habitable and then do the rest bit by bit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,547 ✭✭✭✭Poor Uncle Tom


    It's all down to when you need a Certificate of Compliance, obviously you need to be compliant when the Certificate is being issued. Do you need this before you move into the house (full assigned certifier route with CN), or can you move in and finish off the house over time? (opt-out CN route) If it's the latter there is nothing stopping you from completing the house over time and getting certification once everything is complete and compliant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,063 ✭✭✭UrbanFret


    Digged wrote: »
    I know it's unbelievable. My plan is too just do what's needed to get it habitable and then do the rest bit by bit

    Perfectly sound thinking. Best of luck. Don't get too wound up over it.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,339 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Digged wrote: »
    I know it's unbelievable. My plan is too just do what's needed to get it habitable and then do the rest bit by bit

    To be habitable, it must comply fully with the Building Regulations. So you will either have a compliant house or a non compliant house.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    If you have bank refusals, I think you can apply for a Local authority loan.
    Personally I think solar panels are a total waste. ROI of 30 years.
    BTW rads or some such will go in with both systems. I think the differential between the two is not as big as your suggesting.
    A2W should cost you 5/5,5000 plus installation and commissioning.
    Oil burner and tank 2/2,500 plus installation and commissioning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    It's all down to when you need a Certificate of Compliance, obviously you need to be compliant when the Certificate is being issued. Do you need this before you move into the house (full assigned certifier route with CN), or can you move in and finish off the house over time? (opt-out CN route) If it's the latter there is nothing stopping you from completing the house over time and getting certification once everything is complete and compliant.


    That's what I'm thinking. We wont be selling this new house anyway so won't need certificate for anything soon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    Water John wrote:
    If you have bank refusals, I think you can apply for a Local authority loan. Personally I think solar panels are a total waste. ROI of 30 years. BTW rads or some such will go in with both systems. I think the differential between the two is as big as your suggesting.


    I think solar panels are waste of time to but they have to go on. Think council loan is only for 1st timers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Not if you use A2W so put that 3k, plus a simpler tank, against the Heat Pump.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,063 ✭✭✭UrbanFret


    kceire wrote: »
    To be habitable, it must comply fully with the Building Regulations. So you will either have a compliant house or a non compliant house.

    How do you come to that conclusion? I'm living in my home for 4 years. There are still pillars and piers,boundry walls to be built whenever I get round to it, by that rationale my house is not habitable. :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,686 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Well it sounds as though those issues do not directly effect the dwelling itself in terms of being habitable.
    There are regulations for a reason. It cannot be left to the homeowner to decide what is good enough as most would leave out all ventilation etc.
    As someone who certifies houses, It scares me what many clients want to move into and can't understand why I can't issue cert. One client extended into attic with no thought whatsoever to fire escape or even proper access and then proceeded to make the kids bedrooms up there.
    The same client also wouldn't fund installing the heat recovery and still wanted to move in with zero background ventilation.
    People need to be protected from themselves in these instances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    Water John wrote:
    If you have bank refusals, I think you can apply for a Local authority loan. Personally I think solar panels are a total waste. ROI of 30 years. BTW rads or some such will go in with both systems. I think the differential between the two is not as big as your suggesting. A2W should cost you 5/5,5000 plus installation and commissioning. Oil burner and tank 2/2,500 plus installation and commissioning.


    I got 4 prices on A2W and cheapest was 17,500 supply and fit. Oil solar stove is 9,000 supply and fit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,873 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    UrbanFret wrote: »
    How do you come to that conclusion? I'm living in my home for 4 years. There are still pillars and piers,boundry walls to be built whenever I get round to it, by that rationale my house is not habitable. :eek:


    Its not a conclusion, its a fact that for a HOUSE to be deemed habitable, it must be compliant: e.g.: you cannot be somewhat pregnant.
    Walls etc are a planning permission issue.

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    This is €4,176 + VAT. Should heat the house for you.
    https://www.rvr.ie/products/ecodan-5kw?variant=26096149831


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,339 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    UrbanFret wrote: »
    How do you come to that conclusion? I'm living in my home for 4 years. There are still pillars and piers,boundry walls to be built whenever I get round to it, by that rationale my house is not habitable. :eek:

    Boundary walls do not fall under the remit of the building regulations. They are a planning matter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    Water John wrote:
    This is €4,176 + VAT. Should heat the house for you.


    More to it than just the heat pump. The heat pump and indoor cylinder unit together is 8,000k. 2,700k for underfloor piping or if goin with rads there 2,000k. Zoning controls are 700 and labour is 6,100k


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I worked in UFH supply. The price for piping and full electric controls for your house would be €1,600 + Vat.
    You may have your mind made up. but if you are open minded, shop around a bit more.
    PM me if you wish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Digged


    Water John wrote:
    I worked in UFH supply. The price for piping and full electric controls for your house would be €1,600 + Vat. You may have your mind made up. but if you are open minded, shop around a bit more. PM me if you wish.


    Thanks I'll look into it but a2w so far hasn't come near the price for oil/solar


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭darragh_haven


    kceire wrote: »
    To be habitable, it must comply fully with the Building Regulations. So you will either have a compliant house or a non compliant house.

    Who deems a house habitable? Is there a definition of habitable that is different to the dictionary definition?

    'Suitabile or good enough to live in"


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,339 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Who deems a house habitable? Is there a definition of habitable that is different to the dictionary definition?

    'Suitabile or good enough to live in"

    My mobile home is good enough to live in. Doesn’t mean it compiles with the requirements set out in the Building Regulations.

    It’s not as if people are strong armed into this mess, they know they have to comply before hand but always cheap out and try to do things half arsed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,218 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    Who deems a house habitable? Is there a definition of habitable that is different to the dictionary definition?

    'Suitabile or good enough to live in"

    As I understand it, "habitable" in Irish regs means "appropriate for sleeping in", and "appropriate" means properly serviced, safe, comfortable and energy efficient.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,339 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Lumen wrote: »
    As I understand it, "habitable" in Irish regs means "appropriate for sleeping in", and "appropriate" means properly serviced, safe, comfortable and energy efficient.

    And compliance with our Building Regulations is a certified way of confirming that the dwelling is habitable.


Advertisement