Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Guesstimate my efficiency (or lack)

  • 14-03-2018 4:10pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,800 ✭✭✭✭


    Vague question, apologies if I'm asking an impossible question.

    Have a bungalow, 1950 sq ft/180 sq m. Oil burner is located in the garage approximately 15-20m away from the point of entry to the house. There is also a slack burner in the garage which connects to the system by going up and over the garage roof space and connects at the oil burner.

    The heat then travels across the yard as shown in the orange line. I didn't build the house, but given that there is a dry line there even if there's an inch of snow on the ground, I suspect that the insulation of those pipes is bloody awful and I'm losing a ton of heat.

    445544.png

    I had considered lifting the concrete and relaying/insulating the pipes, but then I thought about going one better. Move the oil burner across the garage so it's close to the slack burner, which removes the heat loss by the long run between the 2. Then run a new line directly across the back of the house, (green line).

    The unanswerable question is, how much more efficient would that actually make the system? Am I looking at a 50% reduction in oil/coal costs (which would make the cost and hassle worth it) or would the improvement be minimal and not worth the bother?

    I realise this is a vague question but I'm trying to get a rough idea to help me decide on whether to start ripping up the back yard!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,565 ✭✭✭K.Flyer


    I'm not going to try work out percentages of improvement, but if it is quite old then anything you do using modern insulation techniques would have to show a significant improvement.

    Here is an example of serious heat loss.
    None of the snow was manually cleared away, it melted as a result of the heat loss through antiquated insulation.

    445562.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,775 ✭✭✭JamesM


    DrPhilG wrote: »
    Vague question, apologies if I'm asking an impossible question.

    Have a bungalow, 1950 sq ft/180 sq m. Oil burner is located in the garage approximately 15-20m away from the point of entry to the house. There is also a slack burner in the garage which connects to the system by going up and over the garage roof space and connects at the oil burner.

    The heat then travels across the yard as shown in the orange line. I didn't build the house, but given that there is a dry line there even if there's an inch of snow on the ground, I suspect that the insulation of those pipes is bloody awful and I'm losing a ton of heat.

    445544.png

    I had considered lifting the concrete and relaying/insulating the pipes, but then I thought about going one better. Move the oil burner across the garage so it's close to the slack burner, which removes the heat loss by the long run between the 2. Then run a new line directly across the back of the house, (green line).

    The unanswerable question is, how much more efficient would that actually make the system? Am I looking at a 50% reduction in oil/coal costs (which would make the cost and hassle worth it) or would the improvement be minimal and not worth the bother?

    I realise this is a vague question but I'm trying to get a rough idea to help me decide on whether to start ripping up the back yard!
    If you have a 30 year old boiler and replace it with a new Grant boiler and run new insulated pipes as you suggest, you could be very close to saving 50%. If your pipes are melting the snow and you just replace and insulate the pipes in the new location, you will make quite a saving, no one can tell what percentage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,800 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    JamesM wrote: »
    If you have a 30 year old boiler and replace it with a new Grant boiler and run new insulated pipes as you suggest, you could be very close to saving 50%. If your pipes are melting the snow and you just replace and insulate the pipes in the new location, you will make quite a saving, no one can tell what percentage.

    House is only about 13 years old and I replaced the oil boiler with a condensing one when I moved here 6 years ago.

    But definitely the pipes are poorly insulated. Not wite as bad as in the previous post but not far off.

    The slack boiler we have should be able to heat the house 24/7 using about 4-5 bags of slack a week. Ours needs nearly 2 per day.

    Thw main opposition to replacing the pipes is that we have a concrete yard and herself doesn't want to leave a big scar across the concrete!

    So I would have the cost of repouring concrete as well as the pipe work itself! So if you have any tips on digging up pipes without breaking the concrete that would be good too, lol.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 951 ✭✭✭Tom44


    Snow & ice melting point is anything above 1 degree Celsius.
    Pipes are 75 degrees flow.
    Yours could be anything from a low heat loss to a high heat loss.

    Infra red thermal camera would tell a lot.
    I've seen a ground temperature of 55 degrees before. OMG


    Replace pipes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,800 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Tom44 wrote: »
    Infra red thermal camera would tell a lot.
    I've seen a ground temperature of 55 degrees before. OMG

    I actually had a thermal imaging done of the house ages ago to see where we could improve insulation etc.

    Never thought to get the ground checked.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,907 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    Could you not move the oil burner to the house wall. This would eliminate all pipework underground.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,800 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Dtp1979 wrote: »
    Could you not move the oil burner to the house wall. This would eliminate all pipework underground.

    Eyesore. Boss lady says no.


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭DGOBS


    Get some pants.


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 6,469 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wearb


    DGOBS wrote: »
    Get some pants.

    :)


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭DGOBS


    Tom...I am being victimised!

    (not asking for help...just thought you'd want to watch):D


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 6,469 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wearb


    DGOBS wrote: »
    Tom...I am being victimised!

    (not asking for help...just thought you'd want to watch):D

    About time he got his comeuppance eh Tom ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭jimf


    tom is probably busy at the moment lots of flights out of cork to Cheltenham

    gold cup day tomorrow


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 6,469 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wearb


    jimf wrote: »
    tom is probably busy at the moment lots of flights out of cork to Cheltenham

    gold cup day tomorrow

    Thought he had his own transport (boat) 🚣*♀️


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,810 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Contact these for a quote for a horizontal drill. Get them to send it to the OH, by mistake, of course. Price mightn't be massive.
    The hole needs to be for a 100mm core.

    http://bothardrilling.ie/directional-drilling/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭agusta


    Tom flies too afaik


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 6,469 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wearb


    agusta wrote: »
    Tom flies too afaik

    Kite?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭agusta


    Wearb wrote: »
    Kite?
    :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 273 ✭✭Vronsky


    DrPhilG wrote: »
    I actually had a thermal imaging done of the house ages ago to see where we could improve insulation etc.

    Never thought to get the ground checked.

    You don't need to get thermal imaging done. Just measure the temperature of the inlet pipe just inside the house when the biller gets up to temperature. Once you have your Delta T and know the flow rate of the pump then we can estimate what energy is lost to outside.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,800 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Vronsky wrote: »
    Once you have your Delta T and know the flow rate of the pump

    You've lost me...


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭DGOBS


    Wearb wrote: »
    About time he got his comeuppance eh Tom ;)

    servivit in catino optime frigoris vindicta ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,597 ✭✭✭gctest50


    How about move the oil boiler to the back of the house in the meantime ?



    afeP0Jh.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,907 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    gctest50 wrote: »
    How about move the oil boiler to the back of the house in the meantime ?



    afeP0Jh.jpg

    Already suggested. His misses won’t av it


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭DGOBS


    And it got me in trouble with da law


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭jimf


    DGOBS wrote: »
    servivit in catino optime frigoris vindicta ;)

    there was a time around here when the mods wer awake that no cursing was allowed on boards

    oh the standards have dropped off


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 819 ✭✭✭Roadtoad


    Man up, dig up, wrap up.

    For the wrap up, don't use the 'attic grade' stuff from the local builders merchant, but a better industrial grade from someone like ATIL in Dublin. Rubber wrap it to keep it dry, although under a big slab it just might dry out itself eventually.
    You are on your own for step 1 and 2.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,800 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Water John wrote: »
    Contact these for a quote for a horizontal drill. Get them to send it to the OH, by mistake, of course. Price mightn't be massive.
    The hole needs to be for a 100mm core.

    http://bothardrilling.ie/directional-drilling/

    This is interesting.

    Didn't think it would be feasible price wise. Would still presumably need a bit of digging at the house end because the pipes enter at the back of the house and go on through underneath the utility room to reach the hot press.

    But a fairly minor amount compared to a trench across the whole yard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,810 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Used often to put water pipes crossing a road. Also can be used to put in a new water pipe from the the boundary box to a house, esp if the old one is leaking.
    It is driven by air compressor.

    From your drawing and thinking the present run is 25m. Then the straight run looks to be about 16m. Don't know the price of insulated twin core, possibly €25/30 per m.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,810 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    OP, this thread may be of interest to you. Crossing under road.

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057855898


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,800 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Water John wrote: »
    OP, this thread may be of interest to you. Crossing under road.

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057855898

    Thanks.

    The bit about the saw I presume? Basically cut it finely and put the same piece back in after laying the pipe?

    Interesting, especially as the horizontal drill option isn't happening. I emailed that company and they basically said that because they need. Fairly big hole at one end, they would make more of a mess than just ripping it up.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement