Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Manual focus to infinity

  • 17-02-2018 7:59pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭


    I'm heading off to hopefully see & photograph the aurora next weekend. From my reading, using manual focus set to infinity is the best. Looking at my lens (Sigma 17-70) i can see a little dot that doesn't move and I can line up the infinity symbol with that and it does seem to be in focus so I am presuming that is where it should be?

    I've read about taping it to keep it in place, however my zoom ring is right next to the focus ring, so I wouldn't be able to tape it?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,140 ✭✭✭John mac


    i wouldn't rely on using the symbol alone , it can be off a tiny bit ,
    best is to manually focus on a bright star , taping it there is a good tip , ,
    you will prob be using the wide end of the zoom so tape shouldn't be a issue.
    best to refocus in the field ,
    *** practice before you go . ***

    if you have your camera set to back button focusing you might be able to focus on a distant object that will give you infinity . without having to set to manual ..


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,887 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    are you going to be shooting wide open?
    if not, focus becomes a little easier as the depth of field will deepen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    Speaking of aurora. What aperture is recommended?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,170 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Speaking of aurora. What aperture is recommended?

    Its a big trade off depending on setup. Too long and its movements soften it, too open and you lose DoF.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭mel.b


    So while the dog was having a run around the park tonight I had a go at trying to manual focus. Ignore the fact that camera isn't level :rolleyes:
    Have I got these in focus?

    This one I used the live view and zoomed in on the seat. I used my head torch to light it up. 4 sec, f2.8 iso 1600
    33vlq3k.jpg

    This is another . 6 sec, f2.8, iso 1600
    2uynkfs.jpg

    This one, the trees look soft to me? Am i correct in thinking, if I focus on the stars then anything in the foreground will be OOF? So I'm better to focus on something in the foreground, but maybe 20-30m away and then everything after that will be in focus?
    2ztaj5z.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,140 ✭✭✭John mac


    there's no photos attached .. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭mel.b


    John mac wrote: »
    there's no photos attached .. :)

    Hmmm...I can see them :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    mel.b wrote: »
    Hmmm...I can see them :confused:

    so can I :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭mel.b


    so can I :D


    That's good! Did I get them in focus ok?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    mel.b wrote: »
    That's good! Did I get them in focus ok?

    All 3 seems to be slightly out.
    Use live view. Magnify as much as possible.
    Good rule of thumb is to dial back from infinity by ¼ to ½ mm


  • Advertisement
Advertisement