Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Sir John Rogerson's Quay

  • 01-02-2018 6:56am
    #1
    WishUWereHere
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭


    I see now they are building extended bicycle lanes up near the Samuel Beckett Bridge end and also building a thick kerb too. This i am guessing is now making the bicycle lanes wider than where vehicles can drive.

    Is there really any need for this?


Comments

  • #2
    Borderfox
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,263 ✭✭✭✭Borderfox


    yes


  • #3
    Northern Monkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,593 ✭✭✭Northern Monkey


    Probably 5 years work in it based on how long they have been working on city quay downward. 1 crossing point from the bridge at city quay down until sprout is retarded.


  • #4
    bigar
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭bigar


    TRIVIA: Bicycles are vehicles too (a mobile machine that transports people or cargo).


  • #5
    cgcsb
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,846 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Desperately needed


  • #6
    magicbastarder
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,867 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    bigar wrote: »
    TRIVIA: Bicycles are vehicles too (a mobile machine that transports people or cargo).
    plus, they operate at pretty much 100% passenger capacity, where cars operate at only 25% capacity generally!


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    bigar
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭bigar


    magicbastarder wrote: »
    plus, they operate at pretty much 100% passenger capacity, where cars operate at only 25% capacity generally!

    True and they are the fastest mode of transport in the City Centre.


  • #8
    Zebra3
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,005 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    WishUWereHere wrote: »
    I see now they are building extended bicycle lanes up near the Samuel Beckett Bridge end and also building a thick kerb too. This i am guessing is now making the bicycle lanes wider than where vehicles can drive.

    Is there really any need for this?

    Why the thumb down?


  • #9
    Corca Baiscinn
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 643 ✭✭✭Corca Baiscinn


    magicbastarder wrote: »
    plus, they operate at pretty much 100% passenger capacity, where cars operate at only 25% capacity generally!

    In the NL I saw them frequently operating at 200% and 250% capacity


  • #10
    loyatemu
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,327 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    WishUWereHere wrote: »
    I see now they are building extended bicycle lanes up near the Samuel Beckett Bridge end and also building a thick kerb too. This i am guessing is now making the bicycle lanes wider than where vehicles can drive.

    Is there really any need for this?

    there was a contra-flow lane here before, then for reasons unknown they changed it to a with-flow lane but people continued using it in both directions. They now seem to be putting in a fully segregated 2-way lane in conjunction with the flood protection works, but it's taking forever to complete.

    (also the flood wall is ugly as hell, never mind Clontarf, I can't believe they've gone with something so utilitarian in the city centre).


  • #11
    bigar
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭bigar


    Corca Baiscinn wrote: »
    In the NL I saw them frequently operating at 200% and 250% capacity

    My neighbour takes his two kids to school each day on the one bicycle. 300% :p


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    WishUWereHere
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    Why the thumb down?

    Apologies for only answering Your question now: Why? I feel the obsession with widening bike lanes is hindering the flow of traffic. And I honestly cannot understand the thickness of the kerb being installed.


  • #13
    Wishbone Ash
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,038 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    WishUWereHere wrote: »
    ....I feel the obsession with widening bike lanes is hindering the flow of traffic....
    Bicycles are traffic too. Anything that hinders private motorised traffic in favour of cycling traffic is a positive step for the city.


  • #14
    amcalester
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭amcalester


    WishUWereHere wrote: »
    Apologies for only answering Your question now: Why? I feel the obsession with widening bike lanes is hindering the flow of traffic. And I honestly cannot understand the thickness of the kerb being installed.

    Do you mean traffic or motorized vehicles?


  • #15
    magicbastarder
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,867 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    WishUWereHere wrote: »
    This i am guessing is now making the bicycle lanes wider than where vehicles can drive.
    do you mean a one way cycle lane is wider than a one way lane for cars? or a two way cycle lane is wider than one lane for cars?


  • #16
    magicbastarder
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,867 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    we're a tough crowd.


  • #17
    Seth Brundle
    Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    WishUWereHere wrote: »
    I see now they are building extended bicycle lanes up near the Samuel Beckett Bridge end and also building a thick kerb too. This i am guessing is now making the bicycle lanes wider than where vehicles can drive.

    Is there really any need for this?
    Open up the city to other road users.
    Remove cars from the city centre, the majority of which will be slow moving diesels vomiting out their cancerous fumes.
    Encourage more people to take up an activity that makes people fitter.
    Possibly reduce the number of red light breakers
    IIRC statistically a cyclist will spend more in the city than a motorist
    Reduce the likelihood of an RTA between a car and a cyclist where there is usually one side coming out worse than the other.

    What's not to like about the plan?


Advertisement