Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Vertical Sightline Requirements for driveway?

  • 24-01-2018 6:31am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3


    Trying again as my last post seemed to have failed!
    I'm in the early stages of looking at building a new house on my family farm. My favourite spot at the moment is on a hill. I can get 90m sightline each side with the correct set back with some hedge trimming (road is 80km/h limit but I'm told the design speed is 60km/h and that's what counts?).
    My friend tells me that he thinks there is also a vertical sightline requirement and because the site is on a steepish hill that I wouldn't be able to comply. I can't find any details on a vertical requirement on Meath CC website, does anyone know if this really exists and what the requirements are? Thanks.


Comments

  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Jamesys wrote: »
    Trying again as my last post seemed to have failed!
    I'm in the early stages of looking at building a new house on my family farm. My favourite spot at the moment is on a hill. I can get 90m sightline each side with the correct set back with some hedge trimming (road is 80km/h limit but I'm told the design speed is 60km/h and that's what counts?).
    My friend tells me that he thinks there is also a vertical sightline requirement and because the site is on a steepish hill that I wouldn't be able to comply. I can't find any details on a vertical requirement on Meath CC website, does anyone know if this really exists and what the requirements are? Thanks.

    if you cannot see to a height of 1.5 m continuously of on coming traffic then your in trouble.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,218 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    This might be useful:

    Sight-Lines-4.jpg
    SIGHT LINES: VERTICAL ALIGNMENT/VISIBILITY
    * Distance/length of unobstructed clear vision required. If the road being accessed is not flat for the appropriate sight line distance on either side, then vertical sightlines need to be considered and demonstrated to the Planning Authority.

    Sight-Lines-5.jpg
    Avoid: VERTICAL ALIGNMENT/VISIBILITY IMPAIRMENT
    * Distance/length of unobstructed clear vision required. Vertical visibility impaired by contour of the road, sight line not achieved.

    Source: http://dnoonan.ie/surveying/site-access


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3 Jamesys


    Thanks, looks like requirements do exist. Any idea where I could find the distances represented by the red astrix? I've been researching a lot of approved planning permission applications online and I don't see any giving these details, even for ones on hills bigger than the one I have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,302 ✭✭✭Schorpio


    I don't know about private access - but I would imagine it's linked to the SSD (sight stopping distance) of the highway the access it connecting to. Basically the ability of a car traveling on the highway to see someone pulling out and stop in time.

    Page 106/107 of the Design Manual for Urban Streets gives the SSDs and outline the visibility measurements (here). Whether that's overkill for a private access I don't know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,218 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    Jamesys wrote: »
    Thanks, looks like requirements do exist. Any idea where I could find the distances represented by the red astrix? I've been researching a lot of approved planning permission applications online and I don't see any giving these details, even for ones on hills bigger than the one I have.

    "Distance/length of unobstructed clear vision required", i.e. the normal horizontal sight lines, listed in the linked article, ultimately sourced from "Table 7/1, Section TD 41-42/09 of the NRA Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB)."

    90m for 60kph design speed, in both directions.

    Regarding the 1.05m height...

    National Roads Authority Volume 6 Section 1
    Design Manual for Roads and Bridges
    http://www.tiipublications.ie/library/DN-GEO-03031-06.pdf
    2.2 Stopping Sight Distance shall be measured from a driver's eye height of between 1.05m and 2.00m, to an object height of between 0.26m and 2.00m both above the road surface, as shown in Figure 3. It shall be checked in both the horizontal and vertical planes, between any two points in the centre of the lane on the inside of the curve (for each carriageway on dual carriageways).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,302 ✭✭✭Schorpio


    Lumen wrote: »
    "Distance/length of unobstructed clear vision required", i.e. the normal horizontal sight lines, listed in the linked article, ultimately sourced from "Table 7/1, Section TD 41-42/09 of the NRA Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB)."

    90m for 60kph design speed, in both directions.

    Regarding the 1.05m height...

    National Roads Authority Volume 6 Section 1
    Design Manual for Roads and Bridges
    http://www.tiipublications.ie/library/DN-GEO-03031-06.pdf

    Whilst all of that is correct, the use of DMURS vs. DMRB is very situational. It really depends on the kind of carriageway. A family farm may not adjoin a National S2 carriageway, in which case DMURS may be more appropriate (59m for 60kph). It really depends on OP's specific situation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3 Jamesys


    Thanks all, it looks a little more complicated than I thought, will go and do some more research.
    Just to throw another spanner in the works I'm considering using the new gateway as new access to the field as well. It would only be occasionally as there are other ways into the field. It looks like that means I might have to use a bigger setback for the sightline measurements. Again similar applications I checked online don't seem to use the bigger set back, is it something that is routinely ignored?


Advertisement