Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Unabomber

Options
  • 16-12-2017 8:08pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,070 ✭✭✭


    I've just finished watching a series on Netflix called Manhunt: Unabomber (excellent show by the way) about Ted Kaczynski, the domestic terrorist who spent from the 70s to the 90s sporadically sending bombs through the post in America.

    I don't condone what he did for a minute, I don't think it could ever be justified in any way, but what do people think of his manifesto? Anyone read it?

    I'd heard of him before this series and I remember his arrest but vaguely as I was a child at the time, and I have googled him in the past but I've not done any in depth research or anything. He basically argues that technology, instead of freeing us, is controlling and enslaving us more than ever, and that we should go back to a more primitive form of society.

    Now I can see that he has a point there to some extent, about technology enslaving us, though I don't know what the resolution should be, I don't particularly relish the thought of living in the woods with no electricity or running water. Though I can imagine that the freedom of such self-sufficiency must be fantastic.

    So, do you think he's just a nut? Or an evil man who killed people just to make a point about society? He has a genius level IQ, if only he'd spent his time promoting his manifesto in other ways, or offering an alternative lifestyle, rather than sending bombs, I'm not sure if he is mentally ill, if it is as simple as that.


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,744 ✭✭✭diomed


    I'm not a fan of people who use guns and bombs to kill people who disagree with them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 415 ✭✭falinn merking


    diomed wrote: »
    I'm not a fan of people who use guns and bombs to kill people who disagree with them.

    Why?


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,068 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    I like your manifesto
    Put it to the testo


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,744 ✭✭✭diomed


    Why?
    You get a vote.
    One person's ideas must be accepted by others, not forced on them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 415 ✭✭falinn merking


    diomed wrote: »
    You get a vote.
    One person's ideas must be accepted by others, not forced on them.

    Why?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,326 ✭✭✭alta stare


    diomed wrote: »
    You get a vote.
    One person's ideas must be accepted by others, not forced on them.

    But what if the right of a vote is not given, do people just accept their faith especially if their faith is in the hands of a dictator or the likes? Most revolutions unfortunately involve violence.

    As for the Unabomber.......well he was just stuck in the stone age with his ideas and beliefs and he took it to a level where only a madman would.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭soups05


    uses internet to promote the idea that technology is bad.


    irony at its finest.


    don't like tech, sell your house, buy a tent and off ya go buddy. but don't be sending bombs to innocent people.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,647 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    Whether he is mental or not everyone including himself would have known & be brought up to know you don't do what he did....

    People like him should have to suffer pain and torture every day for the rest of their lives or at the very least work back breaking jobs that will destroy them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,070 ✭✭✭LadyMacBeth_


    soups05 wrote: »
    uses internet to promote the idea that technology is bad.


    irony at its finest.


    don't like tech, sell your house, buy a tent and off ya go buddy. but don't be sending bombs to innocent people.

    I'm not saying that all tech is bad, nor am I advocating that we all go off to live in the bushes. I do think though that it's no harm to have a discussion about it, in some ways I think that hunter gatherers had simpler lives, with technology and comfort also comes complexity and pressure and distress. Hunter gatherers have/had stress too, survival stress and pressures and fear of violence, but that was their main focus, they knew what they needed to do when they got up in the morning, they didn't have any options or time to hum and haw about it. There was no time for an existential crisis. Now I couldn't live like that, I have an illness that means I'd be dead without modern medicine, I don't like to spend much time outside or off the couch even (though maybe that shows a degeneration of modern society in itself), so I'm not saying that the modern world is evil, I just think it's interesting to think about it.

    I'm basically this: 07.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Personally I think we were happiest when we had some level of technological advancements for healthcare, cooking etc..but I think the vast majority of entertainment and leisure technology today is completely useless and only bringing quality of life down.
    People are obsessed whit heir appearance much more so now than ever before in history, due to social media
    Just one example..and its a big one imo


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,667 ✭✭✭Hector Bellend


    He needed pornhub in his life


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,166 ✭✭✭Are Am Eye


    He did not express himself in the most ideal fashion. But he did have
    some interesting and valid ideas on the downside of modern life and
    technology and the depletion of resources and the environment.
    On balance a mixed bag. Like most of us he wasn't perfect.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,276 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    I live in small county town (well it's considered big locally) after living in a very large city for many years and I can tell you I would just go bonkers if it wasn't for technology. Sure the only reason I'm on boards is cause I've feck all to do in my spare time around here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    AllForIt wrote: »
    I live in small county town (well it's considered big locally) after living in a very large city for many years and I can tell you I would just go bonkers if it wasn't for technology. Sure the only reason I'm on boards is cause I've feck all to do in my spare time around here.

    People suffered boredom in small towns before technology too though. So they played games, went outdoors, talked to other people instead, did gardening.. I know it seems almost cliched to say now but technology si really ykillin human communication and community


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,070 ✭✭✭LadyMacBeth_


    AllForIt wrote: »
    I live in small county town (well it's considered big locally) after living in a very large city for many years and I can tell you I would just go bonkers if it wasn't for technology. Sure the only reason I'm on boards is cause I've feck all to do in my spare time around here.

    I understand that too, I'm actually very heavily reliant on boards and technology in general, especially because I'm often ill and can't do much else. I still think that it's probably unhealthy that I don't spend much time outdoors and I don't enjoy it, I know humans are an advanced species when it comes to intellect but we seem to have developed a society that is totally alien to how our ancestors lived and I wonder how healthy/unhealthy that is. Well, I think maybe there are advantages and disadvantages.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,555 ✭✭✭Roger Hassenforder


    We need to seperate technological gains from social media losses. The world is a better place, but we're in danger of losing our humanity. Social media can be dangerous.


    Reading a book at the moment 'Insight- the power of self awareness in a self deluded world'
    (By Tasha Eurich)

    Touches on the rise of the 'cult of the self' and increasing narcisstic traits, lowered empathy and humility, rampant self presentation - 'cult of the selfie'. Self delusion and self absorption and how everyone thinks theyre special, that people think others give a sh1t what they had for breakfast. how childrens self esteem is protected at all costs with lowered resiliance and coping lifeskills.
    (Havent gotten to the origin of the snowflake yet- i suspect its coming).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,555 ✭✭✭Roger Hassenforder


    I very much agree with his thoughts on liberalism.

    From the one paragraph of his manifesto ive read, im starting to like the guy, he didnt have much love the lefties...
    :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 415 ✭✭falinn merking


    From the one paragraph of his manifesto ive read, im starting to like the guy, he didnt have much love the lefties...
    :p

    Or postal workers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,063 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    wakka12 wrote: »
    Personally I think we were happiest when we had some level of technological advancements for healthcare, cooking etc..but I think the vast majority of entertainment and leisure technology today is completely useless and only bringing quality of life down.
    People are obsessed whit heir appearance much more so now than ever before in history, due to social media
    Just one example..and its a big one imo

    That is not true though. A lot of people are concerned about appearance, but a lot more are not, though of course you don't get blogs and posts from people saying 'I don't care/worry about my appearance'.

    Fashion has been of serious consequence through history. Anyone who could afford to copy what royalty, or the nearest noble family, or even the mayor's wife was wearing, would do so. And even the ones who couldn't afford it wore what was considered acceptable and appropriate for their station, much more so than now.

    People do follow fashion on the internet and social media, but there have been fashion plates to copy almost as long as there has been mass printing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,935 ✭✭✭TallGlass


    Technology is just term. Internet is just a network. Social Media is just a gigantic data mining tool. Social media for what you give in you don't get anywhere near that in return. Information is gold, people give it away for free.

    Imagine, I was to stop you on the street and ask what Facebook asks you? You wouldn't dare give me that info, but for some reason, it's fine once it's online.

    Tech is great, but I think people need to realise the downside of just handing information away non stop free of charge.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,628 ✭✭✭darkdubh


    I remember well the last fatal bombing he carried out and the publishing of his manifesto, there was all speculation about who he was then and he was this criminal mastermind etc when he was eventually caught he was just a mad looking hippy living in a cabin in the woods.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭fatknacker


    Is he related to the hirsute German lady known as Una Brauer?


  • Registered Users Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    I though I don't know what the resolution should be, .

    4k is plenty for now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,189 ✭✭✭Malayalam


    I understand that too, I'm actually very heavily reliant on boards and technology in general, especially because I'm often ill and can't do much else. I still think that it's probably unhealthy that I don't spend much time outdoors and I don't enjoy it, I know humans are an advanced species when it comes to intellect but we seem to have developed a society that is totally alien to how our ancestors lived and I wonder how healthy/unhealthy that is. Well, I think maybe there are advantages and disadvantages.

    Was recently reading Sapiens by Yuval Harari and if one believes his outline of things our ancestors had it reasonably good at the hunter-gatherer stage when we pretty much organised ourselves according to our likes in small, supportive clans, but even by the time we became agriculturalists our lives were changing for the worst. We became chained to back-breaking work in the fields, hauling water, weeding, harvesting, subject to more diseases and wars, eventually paying onerous levies no mater what corner we lived in to the controllers of emerging and often brutal empires - never quite catching up with our tails as the population increased and, consequently, food demands grew, etc.
    The industrial revolution resulted in another new kind of unnatural enslavement of the lives of most people. It's a long time since the bulk of our species has had what one could call healthy lives.
    Yes, we are enslaved now, and in many ways, most people chained for example to the kind of jobs and daily timetables that are not natural for the human body and psyche, and we are enslaved via technology. But it is nothing that new.
    When people talk about how tech has atomised society I feel that there are a lot of even more fundamental things that do so - leaving infants and children in creches from dawn to dusk would be a bugbear of mine, but the modern lifestyle and economic models neccessitates both parents working, it seems. Tech cannot be made the solitary scapegoat for underlying cultural and political madness. And I do believe we are largely mad. Though better off in many ways than at earlier epochs.
    Was just talking at home about it, hubby saying how many kids and teens are always on their tech, but I reckoned it's not as if we as societies ever really thought about and provided good, healthy occupations for our youngsters - drinking cider, smoking fags and having spitting contests down the canal walk has been replaced by social media to some extent, neither awesome by any means. There was no prior Utopia.
    I think we as individuals can make better choices, rather than look to the mass culture to change to enable us to be more wholesome. Plus I also genuinely think that everything turns in circles, technology will hold waning interest eventually for a lot of people, will begin to have a more appropriate level of presence in their lives. People will go back walking, gardening, writing, painting, performing, and so on, because satiation with tech will naturally reach a climax. I think it has a potentially cool and useful place in our lives - I am involved in creative digital media and I love the possibilities of tech, the creativity, the communication, the sharing, the info-tainment, etc - just we will learn to accommodate it with more balance. More time in the woods and by the sea! Yay! :)


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 896 Mod ✭✭✭✭Fuzzytrooper


    Malayalam wrote: »
    Was recently reading Sapiens by Yuval Harari and if one believes his outline of things our ancestors had it reasonably good at the hunter-gatherer stage when we pretty much organised ourselves according to our likes in small, supportive clans, but even by the time we became agriculturalists our lives were changing for the worst. We became chained to back-breaking work in the fields, hauling water, weeding, harvesting, subject to more diseases and wars, eventually paying onerous levies no mater what corner we lived in to the controllers of emerging and often brutal empires - never quite catching up with our tails as the population increased and, consequently, food demands grew, etc.
    The industrial revolution resulted in another new kind of unnatural enslavement of the lives of most people. It's a long time since the bulk of our species has had what one could call healthy lives.
    Yes, we are enslaved now, and in many ways, most people chained for example to the kind of jobs and daily timetables that are not natural for the human body and psyche, and we are enslaved via technology. But it is nothing that new.
    When people talk about how tech has atomised society I feel that there are a lot of even more fundamental things that do so - leaving infants and children in creches from dawn to dusk would be a bugbear of mine, but the modern lifestyle and economic models neccessitates both parents working, it seems. Tech cannot be made the solitary scapegoat for underlying cultural and political madness. And I do believe we are largely mad. Though better off in many ways than at earlier epochs.
    Was just talking at home about it, hubby saying how many kids and teens are always on their tech, but I reckoned it's not as if we as societies ever really thought about and provided good, healthy occupations for our youngsters - drinking cider, smoking fags and having spitting contests down the canal walk has been replaced by social media to some extent, neither awesome by any means. There was no prior Utopia.
    I think we as individuals can make better choices, rather than look to the mass culture to change to enable us to be more wholesome. Plus I also genuinely think that everything turns in circles, technology will hold waning interest eventually for a lot of people, will begin to have a more appropriate level of presence in their lives. People will go back walking, gardening, writing, painting, performing, and so on, because satiation with tech will naturally reach a climax. I think it has a potentially cool and useful place in our lives - I am involved in creative digital media and I love the possibilities of tech, the creativity, the communication, the sharing, the info-tainment, etc - just we will learn to accommodate it with more balance. More time in the woods and by the sea! Yay! :)

    Your ideas intreague me and I would like to subscribe to your literature...I regularly find myself in a weird position where I'm too tired in the evenings to do anything creative but conversely when I get off the couch and work on a model for example I find I unwind better than brainfarting on the TV. Path of least resistance and all that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,189 ✭✭✭Malayalam


    Your ideas intreague me and I would like to subscribe to your literature...I regularly find myself in a weird position where I'm too tired in the evenings to do anything creative but conversely when I get off the couch and work on a model for example I find I unwind better than brainfarting on the TV. Path of least resistance and all that.

    :) Kind of you, the literature I was mentioning was Yuval Harari's book and there are various other ones in the ilk. One of the great things about tech (I find) is the PDFs on so many varied subjects I can download to my Kindle, which can be so stimulating, ideas wise.
    It is true what you say, the unwinding that happens outside of technology is far more effective. Even hours spent wrestling with the garden / jungle tire one and use up stress in a way that feels so much more satsifying and effective than watching netflix on the couch (which I also love, believe me!!)


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,068 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    They'd have flushed him out much sooner if they'd had referred to him as the Uni-bummer" instead


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,070 ✭✭✭LadyMacBeth_


    @Malayalam, I also read Yuval Harari's Sapiens and it's a brilliant read.

    I took some archaeology modules in college so I was already familiar with some of the other species of humans but I found that the language of the book made it a far easier and enjoyable read than some of the convoluted articles I read in college. I also found that it provided an excellent overall timeline of human society and development which was easy to follow.

    I suppose I have been thinking about society in general and where we are going as a species for a while, even reading the manifesto reminded me of Orwell's 1984 and how modern hard-core lefties seek to almost police people's thoughts.

    Black mirror is another excellent show that shows the various ways that technology can lead to a dystopian society and I found it fascinating to watch, especially because it seems plausible that such technology could exist and be used in ways that we can't foresee/never intended.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,189 ✭✭✭Malayalam


    @Malayalam, I also read Yuval Harari's Sapiens and it's a brilliant read.

    I took some archaeology modules in college so I was already familiar with some of the other species of humans but I found that the language of the book made it a far easier and enjoyable read than some of the convoluted articles I read in college. I also found that it provided an excellent overall timeline of human society and development which was easy to follow.

    I suppose I have been thinking about society in general and where we are going as a species for a while, even reading the manifesto reminded me of Orwell's 1984 and how modern hard-core lefties seek to almost police people's thoughts.

    Black mirror is another excellent show that shows the various ways that technology can lead to a dystopian society and I found it fascinating to watch, especially because it seems plausible that such technology could exist and be used in ways that we can't foresee/never intended.
    Have not got round to serious Black Mirror binge...yet!...although have seen a couple of episodes. Looks good, nothing too surprising, Pandora's Box is open, what can be done will be done. Evil is a perennial human attribute and thus I reckon all the bad things will and have happened since forever. Likewise the good and the wise are human attributes, so it will probably be some ongoing struggle as to how our society and greater civilization handles things. Worship of transhumanism is definitely a facet of our future, the possibilities are quite staggering, I guess we had better grow up as a species! Sorry reply is stilted, using phone not laptop and ironically given the subject I am not used to using it..haha. Just got given an ancient one by mother in law!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,673 ✭✭✭AudreyHepburn


    Are Am Eye wrote: »
    He did not express himself in the most ideal fashion. But he did have
    some interesting and valid ideas on the downside of modern life and
    technology and the depletion of resources and the environment.
    On balance a mixed bag. Like most of us he wasn't perfect.

    He invalidated any good points he was trying to make when he maimed and killed innocent people.

    Nothing justifies hos actions.


Advertisement