Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New owner, changing work conditions

  • 20-11-2017 11:04pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 870 ✭✭✭


    Hi,

    If your place of work of say 20 employees gets a new owner, who then say, makes breaks unpaid and removes other little benefits, would the employees have any footing to resist these changes?


Comments

  • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,773 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


    They would. And their solicitor would be best-placed to advise them on how to do so.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,021 ✭✭✭lifeandtimes


    Tupe would be assumed if nothing else was agreed betweem all employees prior to the new owner taking over.

    Contact a solcitior as a group and take it from there


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,723 ✭✭✭rock22


    Tupe would be assumed if nothing else was agreed betweem all employees prior to the new owner taking over.

    Contact a solcitior as a group and take it from there

    or get your trade union involved


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,021 ✭✭✭lifeandtimes


    rock22 wrote: »
    or get your trade union involved

    Doubt there's a union with only 20 employees but op would be better fixed to tell us


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    The old employer I believe can give all the staff a P45 because they aren't employing them anymore then the new employer can rehire on their new terms.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,189 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    New owner doesn't need to keep any of the old staff afaik.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,245 ✭✭✭myshirt


    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    New owner doesn't need to keep any of the old staff afaik.

    If the legal advice is smart, maybe.

    Read up on transfer of undertakings legislation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,998 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    my3cents wrote: »
    The old employer I believe can give all the staff a P45 because they aren't employing them anymore then the new employer can rehire on their new terms.
    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    New owner doesn't need to keep any of the old staff afaik.
    This is precisely the kind of thing that the European Communitities (Protection of Employees' Rights on Transfer of Undertakings) Regulations 2003 seek to prohibit. (There's a bit of a clue in the name.)

    OP, do not be relying on what you read on Boards. Get together with your colleagues; go and and talk to a trade union or to a solicitor or both to find out what your options are. But you definitely have options.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,228 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    rock22 wrote:
    or get your trade union involved

    Why is it the default assumption in this forum that there's always a union in place? I've been working full time for 18 years and have never worked in a company with a union presence.

    Not having a pop, just genuinely curious. Surely I can't be that much of an outlier?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,998 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Dial Hard wrote: »
    Why is it the default assumption in this forum that there's always a union in place? I've been working full time for 18 years and have never worked in a company with a union presence.

    Not having a pop, just genuinely curious. Surely I can't be that much of an outlier?
    Depending on who you believe, "union density" in Ireland is between 30% and 35% of the workforce. So, no, you're not at all unusual.

    But union density does vary widely depending on sector, industry, enterprise size, etc. You could very easily have a working career in which you are always in unionised enterprises, and come to think of that as the norm.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    my3cents wrote: »
    The old employer I believe can give all the staff a P45 because they aren't employing them anymore then the new employer can rehire on their new terms.

    Employees would be entitled to redundancy from old employer if that was done.

    Op you are entitled to protection under tupe legislation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    TUPE is probably the single most complicated area of employment law and it does not always apply, for example it may not apply if there is no transfer of tangible assets and non tangible assets which employees use in their employment then TUPE will not apply.

    Best to speak to a solicitor (as opposes to a union (if any)) who specialises in employment law, as someone with first hand experience in the matter I can tell you as this can be complicated even a union can ill advise in this area.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,718 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    Dial Hard wrote: »
    Why is it the default assumption in this forum that there's always a union in place? I've been working full time for 18 years and have never worked in a company with a union presence.

    Not having a pop, just genuinely curious. Surely I can't be that much of an outlier?

    Same, have been working for similar length of time, have been unionised for just five, and the one and only time they were needed we were thrown under the bus and too insignificant due to numbers, yet they take union subs!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,723 ✭✭✭rock22


    _Brian wrote: »
    Same, have been working for similar length of time, have been unionised for just five, and the one and only time they were needed we were thrown under the bus and too insignificant due to numbers, yet they take union subs!

    Care to elaborate?

    I personally have never come across a union throwing members under the bus and I have never heard of any such complaint


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 870 ✭✭✭Kuva


    Employees would be entitled to redundancy from old employer if that was done.

    Op you are entitled to protection under tupe legislation.

    OP here, theirs no union and the latest is the old employer is actually letting everyone go with P45 to be given to new owners directly.

    No mention of redundancy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 870 ✭✭✭Kuva


    GM228 wrote: »
    TUPE is probably the single most complicated area of employment law and it does not always apply, for example it may not apply if there is no transfer of tangible assets and non tangible assets which employees use in their employment then TUPE will not apply.

    Best to speak to a solicitor (as opposes to a union (if any)) who specialises in employment law, as someone with first hand experience in the matter I can tell you as this can be complicated even a union can ill advise in this area.

    Non tangible assets?

    A Google of that, if it must apply it's like a big stick to beat the little man with.

    What is general cost of a solicitor for something like this?

    Can terms and conditions be carried over when you are being rehired by new owner?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham




Advertisement