Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Claire Byrne - Dil Wickremasinghe

  • 13-10-2017 2:09pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭


    So anyone watch the Claire Byrne show on Monday night?

    https://www.rte.ie/player/ie/show/claire-byrne-live-30003252/10787446/

    Can have a look:

    So they had Dil Wickremasinghe on the show.
    Essentially Dil was out spoken over the George Hook fiasco.
    If I remember correctly in the interview with Claire she more or less said "She did not feel comfortable sharing the airwaves with George" after he made his comments around rape.

    She said that she did not want George to be sacked... Not entirely sure if I believe that considering her position she took but anyways....

    George was suspended from NT and a week or two later Dil's show was also axed.

    So on the show Dil gave some emotional speak to her own life, things she went threw as a child and a story about an uncle who was a journalist.
    However I could not help think there is a huge element of hypocrisy in what she was saying.

    She spoke about being a gay woman and talked about her uncle who was a journalist who was killed for speaking out against this government (I think) in Sri Lanka and how as a journalists they should be allowed to speak out without fear. She talked about how her uncle was her inspiration. This I think was really in response to her own show being axed.

    So Dil I think likes the idea of free speak and being able to report as long as the opinions and ideas are in fitting with her own. She was happy to silence George Hook, but wants to call foul when she gets the same treatment?

    I see this as a reoccurring thing, an extreme leftist ideology that has gotten out of control.

    On one hand it's like
    "Your words offended me you should be silenced"
    Then on the other hand
    "How dare you try and silence me you fascist!!"

    Thoughts?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    Was she trying to equate her own work with that of her journalist uncle who was the subject of a political murder?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,758 ✭✭✭Pelvis


    What's the big dil?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    Was she trying to equate her own work with that of her journalist uncle who was the subject of a political murder?

    Latch onto an emotional connection to justify her own actions and create sympathy for her


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭givyjoe


    So anyone watch the Claire Byrne show on Monday night?

    https://www.rte.ie/player/ie/show/claire-byrne-live-30003252/10787446/

    Can have a look:

    So they had Dil Wickremasinghe on the show.
    Essentially Dil was out spoken over the George Hook fiasco.
    If I remember correctly in the interview with Claire she more or less said "She did not feel comfortable sharing the airwaves with George" after he made his comments around rape.

    She said that she did not want George to be sacked... Not entirely sure if I believe that considering her position she took but anyways....

    George was suspended from NT and a week or two later Dil's show was also axed.

    So on the show Dil gave some emotional speak to her own life, things she went threw as a child and a story about an uncle who was a journalist.
    However I could not help think there is a huge element of hypocrisy in what she was saying.

    She spoke about being a gay woman and talked about her uncle who was a journalist who was killed for speaking out against this government (I think) in Sri Lanka and how as a journalists they should be allowed to speak out without fear. She talked about how her uncle was her inspiration. This I think was really in response to her own show being axed.

    So Dil I think likes the idea of free speak and being able to report as long as the opinions and ideas are in fitting with her own. She was happy to silence George Hook, but wants to call foul when she gets the same treatment?

    I see this as a reoccurring thing, an extreme leftist ideology that has gotten out of control.

    On one hand it's like
    "Your words offended me you should be silenced"
    Then on the other hand
    "How dare you try and silence me you fascist!!"

    Thoughts?
    She's a bit of whinger whose show was axed because 'no one' listened to it. Her view on George Hook probably did prompt them to give her the axe sooner. i.e. don't be telling us what to do mentality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭ShowMeTheCash


    Was she trying to equate her own work with that of her journalist uncle who was the subject of a political murder?

    She seemed pretty emotional I am not entirely sure the reason. Her part on the player is really only 10 minutes towards the end of the show.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,837 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Free speech is about being able to say what you want without being jailed for it.

    It has nothing to do with any right to a platform to say what you want.

    Dil didn't want to be associated with a platform that Hook represented and one which condoned his message. So she left.

    The only hypocrisy would be if she was demanding he be arrested for his comments (which, if he had something mean about God he could have been...).

    If she said something on her show that Newstalk didn't agree with or felt was against their code of ethics, they could chose to stop airing her show - that isn't a free speech issue.

    Being able to speak without fear of being killed by your government is different to be able to say what you like, whereever you like, without fear of consequences of any sort.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,734 Mod ✭✭✭✭Boom_Bap


    Hang on....I seem to recall that she issued the radio station, her employer and ultimatum!

    Is that not the case.

    Now if I marched into HR now and demanded that someone is taken off a certain duty or I will walk, what does one think will happen?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,951 ✭✭✭B0jangles


    Is Dil the new bogeyfeminist?

    Poor Louise O'Neill will be heartbroken :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭Barry Badrinath


    So she left.

    Left?

    I thought her show was cancelled...she did not leave, she was sacked.

    Also, fcuk off Dil, you annoying fcuktard.

    Aaaaaaahhhhh thats better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,754 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    So anyone watch the Claire Byrne show on Monday night?

    https://www.rte.ie/player/ie/show/claire-byrne-live-30003252/10787446/

    Can have a look:

    So they had Dil Wickremasinghe on the show.
    Essentially Dil was out spoken over the George Hook fiasco.
    If I remember correctly in the interview with Claire she more or less said "She did not feel comfortable sharing the airwaves with George" after he made his comments around rape.

    She said that she did not want George to be sacked... Not entirely sure if I believe that considering her position she took but anyways....

    George was suspended from NT and a week or two later Dil's show was also axed.

    So on the show Dil gave some emotional speak to her own life, things she went threw as a child and a story about an uncle who was a journalist.
    However I could not help think there is a huge element of hypocrisy in what she was saying.

    She spoke about being a gay woman and talked about her uncle who was a journalist who was killed for speaking out against this government (I think) in Sri Lanka and how as a journalists they should be allowed to speak out without fear. She talked about how her uncle was her inspiration. This I think was really in response to her own show being axed.

    So Dil I think likes the idea of free speak and being able to report as long as the opinions and ideas are in fitting with her own. She was happy to silence George Hook, but wants to call foul when she gets the same treatment?

    I see this as a reoccurring thing, an extreme leftist ideology that has gotten out of control.

    On one hand it's like
    "Your words offended me you should be silenced"
    Then on the other hand
    "How dare you try and silence me you fascist!!"

    Thoughts?



    Generally speaking, free speech is something you have but also have to take responsibilty for. It has ramifications, it has consequences, as Hook found out.

    It's not about saying what you like when you like, it's choosing when to say what you want and on what forum to express certain viewpoints.

    That said, part of being a broadcast journalist is having to share the airwaves or interview people who may make you feel uncomfortable and debating withpeople who will have extreme or alternate views.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    Basically she sought to exploit the situation with hook to raise her own profile and right-on credentials and it backfired on her.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,837 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Boom_Bap wrote: »
    Hang on....I seem to recall that she issued the radio station, her employer and ultimatum!

    Is that not the case.

    Now if I marched into HR now and demanded that someone is taken off a certain duty or I will walk, what does one think will happen?

    Are you more popular and/or powerful than the person you are demanding sacked?


  • Moderators, Music Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,734 Mod ✭✭✭✭Boom_Bap


    Are you more popular and/or powerful than the person you are demanding sacked?

    It's making the demand in the first place is where the problem lies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,837 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Left?

    I thought her show was cancelled...she did not leave, she was sacked.

    Also, fcuk off Dil, you annoying fcuktard.

    Aaaaaaahhhhh thats better.

    I don't know. I assumed from the tone of the OP she left, but whether she left or issued an ultimatum that resulted in her being sacked doesn't really change the point I am making.

    She didn't want to be associated with a platform represented by Hook, and one way or another she is not.

    It isn't an issue of Free Speech.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,837 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Boom_Bap wrote: »
    It's making the demand in the first place is where the problem lies.

    I dunno.

    If Hook demanded Dil was removed (for some reason, make one up in your head) do you think Hook would have been sacked and saw Dil moved to a different time slot?

    I would think the position/power of the person making the demand (and same for the person they are making a demand of) will play massively into any decision a company makes.

    Are you arguing that a company would automatically side against, and sack, the person making the demand? I would think history proves that not correct.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,064 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    The same Dil who thought she knew more about giving birth than the professionals who helped her when she decided to have a home birth

    Always the victim


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭alchemist33


    B0jangles wrote: »
    Is Dil the new bogeyfeminist?

    Poor Louise O'Neill will be heartbroken :(

    I think I'll dress up as a Bogeyfeminist for Halloween.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭Barry Badrinath


    I don't know. I assumed from the tone of the OP she left, but whether she left or issued an ultimatum that resulted in her being sacked doesn't really change the point I am making.

    She didn't want to be associated with a platform represented by Hook, and one way or another she is not.

    It isn't an issue of Free Speech.

    Im not making an argument for/against free speech.

    Saying she "left" puts a very different slant on the situation, considering her show was axed and it was a bit of a surprise to her...apparently.

    Anyway. Im just here to say how much of an insufferable arsehole I think she is.

    Thats all.


  • Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Was she trying to equate her own work with that of her journalist uncle who was the subject of a political murder?
    No. She wasn't. She explained that journalism requires standing up for civic freedoms, even if it's a bad career move. She said that's a lesson her cousin taught her -- she didn't imply for a moment that she had suffered the same fate as him.

    It's like someone entering politics because they were inspired by Martin Luther King. It doesn't mean they have suffered like MLK, obviously. It just means they see his integrity as inspirational.
    She seemed pretty emotional I am not entirely sure the reason.
    Because she lost her job, maybe her career? Just a wild guess.
    Boom_Bap wrote: »
    Hang on....I seem to recall that she issued the radio station, her employer and ultimatum!
    There was no ultimatum. Newstalk accepted that she wasn't happy going on-air that weekend, she made it clear she wasn't looking for Hook to be fired.

    Newstalk are claiming that dropping DW had nothing to do with her decision not to go on air that weekend. They say it's a scheduling issue. Some people even believe them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,951 ✭✭✭B0jangles


    I think I'll dress up as a Bogeyfeminist for Halloween.

    Don't forget the fangs!

    http://www.harkavagrant.com/?id=341


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Music Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,734 Mod ✭✭✭✭Boom_Bap


    I dunno.

    If Hook demanded Dil was removed (for some reason, make one up in your head) do you think Hook would have been sacked and saw Dil moved to a different time slot?

    I would think the position/power of the person making the demand (and same for the person they are making a demand of) will play massively into any decision a company makes.

    Are you arguing that a company would automatically side against, and sack, the person making the demand? I would think history proves that not correct.

    See I think that you are missing my point...what you are saying is completely valid, 100%, I agree with you.

    But, why is any employee demanding a co-worker is sacked?

    There are proper channels for this type of thing through HR, put publicly demanding ultimatum style.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭ShowMeTheCash


    I don't know. I assumed from the tone of the OP she left, but whether she left or issued an ultimatum that resulted in her being sacked doesn't really change the point I am making.

    She didn't want to be associated with a platform represented by Hook, and one way or another she is not.

    It isn't an issue of Free Speech.

    The way she worded it on Monday was, usually if the show needs funding they will tell her there is no funding, in the past she has said she had to go find funding of her own to keep the show alive.

    She said this time there was no conversation just that the show was being cancelled. She then said people can make up their own minds to why.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,973 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    No. She wasn't. She explained that journalism requires standing up for civic freedoms, even if it's a bad career move. She said that's a lesson her cousin taught her -- she didn't imply for a moment that she had suffered the same fate as him.

    It's like someone entering politics because they were inspired by Martin Luther King. It doesn't mean they have suffered like MLK, obviously. It just means they see his integrity as inspirational.

    Because she lost her job, maybe her career? Just a wild guess.

    There was no ultimatum. Newstalk accepted that she wasn't happy going on-air that weekend, she made it clear she wasn't looking for Hook to be fired.

    Newstalk are claiming that dropping DW had nothing to do with her decision not to go on air that weekend. They say it's a scheduling issue. Some people even believe them.

    She said she wasn't comfortable sharing the airwaves with someone like George Hook. When she is being listened to online she is sharing the airwaves with ISIS videos, snuff videos, rape porn and other despicable things. She has no control over who or what material she shares the airwaves or any other medium with.

    Her show had few listeners. Her show got axed. Now she is trying to equate her failed broadcasting career to her being a victim. No the only victims here are the people that stumbled across your show by accident.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    She said she wasn't comfortable sharing the airwaves with someone like George Hook.
    She said she wasn't comfortable using Newstalk as a platform, when there was no review of Hook's words. Newstalk accepted that.

    She didn't say she wasn't comfortable in Hook remaining on air. Quite the opposite, she said she didn't want him to lose his job.

    i could be wrong, of course; can point me to the mysterious quote of hers you're referencing? I haven't heard it anywhere.
    Her show had few listeners.
    Yeah? Do you know how many?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,412 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    She lost me at the word ‘triggered’.

    First.
    Bloody.
    Sentence.

    :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    Boom_Bap wrote: »
    Hang on....I seem to recall that she issued the radio station, her employer and ultimatum!

    Is that not the case.

    Now if I marched into HR now and demanded that someone is taken off a certain duty or I will walk, what does one think will happen?
    It depends where you work. Some places will promote you out of the way!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,973 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    She said she wasn't comfortable sharing the airwaves with someone like George Hook.
    She said she wasn't comfortable using Newstalk as a platform, when there was no review of Hook's words. Newstalk accepted that.

    She didn't say she wasn't comfortable in Hook remaining on air. Quite the opposite, she said she didn't want him to lose his job.

    i could be wrong, of course; can point me to the mysterious quote of hers you're referencing? I haven't heard it anywhere.
    Her show had few listeners.
    Yeah? Do you know how many?

    25,000 according to her tweet

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,400 ✭✭✭Vyse


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    25,000 according to her tweet

    I think that might have been cumulative over the lifetime of the show though.


  • Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    25,000 according to her tweet
    which is a substantial reach for that time, on a weekend evening, on a commercial broadcaster.

    By way of comparison, John Creedon, who has a weekday show (when listener reach is higher), and who broadcasts on the state broadcaster, has about 35,000 listeners. RTÉ Arena has only about 30,000 listeners.

    For a very commercial broadcaster outside of prime time listening, DW could not reasonably have been expected to perform better.

    I wasn't the show's biggest fan, I often criticised it. But nobody can doubt that she managed to pull impressive audience figures, whether you like her or not.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭blue note


    I was disappointed that Claire Byrne didn't put it to her that given the position she put her employer, was it not fair that they fired her? I know she'd obviously have said no, but the viewers deserved to have her position questioned. The consensus here is that her sacking was fully understandable, but that wasn't even put forward as a viewpoint by Claire Byrne.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,005 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    She said she wasn't comfortable sharing the airwaves with someone like George Hook. When she is being listened to online she is sharing the airwaves with ISIS videos, snuff videos, rape porn and other despicable things. She has no control over who or what material she shares the airwaves or any other medium with.

    Her show had few listeners. Her show got axed. Now she is trying to equate her failed broadcasting career to her being a victim. No the only victims here are the people that stumbled across your show by accident.

    Probably the most accurate summation of DW's recent antics.

    Her "Journalistic" endeavours have largely centred upon seeking out a variety of individuals/groups,who allege discrimination,oppression or racism against the Irish State (Or any other State that came along at the time).

    To say this lady had a narrowly focused agenda,is putting it very mildly indeed,and it is hardly surprising that Newstalk has finally decided to move ahead without her input.

    I would be interested to ascertain just who was bankrolling her programme,if ShowMeTheCash's post is indeed accurate...
    She didn't want to be associated with a platform represented by Hook, and one way or another she is not.

    It isn't an issue of Free Speech.

    The way she worded it on Monday was, usually if the show needs funding they will tell her there is no funding, in the past she has said she had to go find funding of her own to keep the show alive.

    She said this time there was no conversation just that the show was being cancelled. She then said people can make up their own minds to why.

    There is a certain insidiousness in such personalities,particularly on Radio,whereby they become so convinced of their own abilities,that they abandon reason,mostly with inevitable consequences.

    It would be interesting to learn of who,or what entity was "funding" DW's output,and what level of input these entities then had,into the content of her programming ?


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,973 ✭✭✭RayM


    B0jangles wrote: »
    Is Dil the new bogeyfeminist?

    Poor Louise O'Neill will be heartbroken :(

    It's funny - despite following Louise O'Neill on Twitter, I see her name popping up way more often on Boards. On a similar note, Dil Wickremasinghe gets a huge amount of mentions on Boards, despite presenting an easily avoidable weekly radio show that (supposedly) hardly anyone listens to.

    I only ever listened to her show if I happened to be driving. Sometimes it was interesting, other times it was worthy but a bit dull and obscure. Still, it made a change from Newstalk's usual diet of incurious elderly and middle-aged men moaning about cyclists, millennials and "snowflakes".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,166 ✭✭✭Are Am Eye


    She is the most atrocious human being that has ever existed.
    And I'm including Stalin, Cromwell, Pol Pot etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,982 ✭✭✭minikin


    Always get a weird vibe off her, what did Dil do now?
    They should give Georgie Hook the Global Village show spot to give his own unique perspective on da wimmins and forners issues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭retro:electro


    The way she kept referring to her show as her "civic duty" was really cringe. I think she's overestimating her reach and her importance in public life just a tad.
    Honestly I feel a bit bad for her losing her job, she's not an awful person she's just severely annoying. But that's the name of the game when you bad mouth your employer.
    Also the fact that nobody was willing to sponsor her show and she had to find one herself speaks volumes.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,951 ✭✭✭B0jangles


    RayM wrote: »
    It's funny - despite following Louise O'Neill on Twitter, I see her name popping up way more often on Boards. On a similar note, Dil Wickremasinghe gets a huge amount of mentions on Boards, despite presenting an easily avoidable weekly radio show that (supposedly) hardly anyone listens to.

    I only ever listened to her show if I happened to be driving. Sometimes it was interesting, other times it was worthy but a bit dull and obscure. Still, it made a change from Newstalk's usual diet of incurious elderly and middle-aged men moaning about cyclists, millennials and "snowflakes".

    Sure, I remember when this was all fields as far as you could see and AH's Most Hated feminist was the fearsome Una Mullally (may the Gods curse her name).

    :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭ShowMeTheCash


    She said she wasn't comfortable using Newstalk as a platform, when there was no review of Hook's words. Newstalk accepted that.

    She didn't say she wasn't comfortable in Hook remaining on air. Quite the opposite, she said she didn't want him to lose his job.

    i could be wrong, of course; can point me to the mysterious quote of hers you're referencing? I haven't heard it anywhere.

    Yeah you are wrong and hardly mysterious her whole bit was literally about 10 minutes long!

    34:32 on the player

    "I contacted the station on tuesday, as a survivour of sexual abuse and violence I felt uncomforable sharing the airwaves with him"

    That took me like... a minute to find...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭ShowMeTheCash


    Just on some of the things she said now that I am listening to it again.

    She talks about journalism in Ireland

    43:55
    "we do not want to end up in a situation where journalists are fearful for asking the challenging questions"

    What got George Hook suspended was this

    "But is there no blame to the person that puts themselves in danger?"

    So I think she is perpetuating the environment to which she speaks out against. Somewhat Ironic how this all panned out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,091 ✭✭✭backspin.


    B0jangles wrote: »

    Poor Louise O'Neill will be heartbroken :(

    Ah Louise i had forgot all about her. She seems to be very quiet these days, did she find happiness or something.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭arayess


    Free speech is about being able to say what you want without being jailed for it.

    it's not really
    any punishment for speaking out is a denial of free speech because it censors or attempts censor what a person wants to articulate


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,647 ✭✭✭lazybones32


    Let dil fade away into obscurity.


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭Ralf and Florian


    Apparently she did stand up comedy at some point, that's how I heard of her first, in an article in I think the Sunday Times about stand up in Dublin maybe five or more years ago. Didn't hear her name again till the thing about her breastfeeding on some TV3 show.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,005 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    Just on some of the things she said now that I am listening to it again.

    She talks about journalism in Ireland

    43:55
    "we do not want to end up in a situation where journalists are fearful for asking the challenging questions"

    What got George Hook suspended was this

    "But is there no blame to the person that puts themselves in danger?"

    So I think she is perpetuating the environment to which she speaks out against. Somewhat Ironic how this all panned out.

    I would be slow to classify DW as a "Journalist" in any meaningful sense of the word.
    A Presenter,perhaps,and even that would be stretching it,as she very obviously lacked the ability to present programmes whose content did'nt fit her preferred line of thought.
    Perhaps Newstalk could rerun full series of BBC Radio's "Letter from America" to whet Dil's appetitite for the Job ?


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,973 ✭✭✭RayM


    Just on some of the things she said now that I am listening to it again.

    She talks about journalism in Ireland

    43:55
    "we do not want to end up in a situation where journalists are fearful for asking the challenging questions"

    What got George Hook suspended was this

    "But is there no blame to the person that puts themselves in danger?"

    So I think she is perpetuating the environment to which she speaks out against. Somewhat Ironic how this all panned out.

    I think she was suggesting that journalists should speak truth to power. Which is the absolute fucking opposite of what George Hook did.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭ShowMeTheCash


    RayM wrote: »
    I think she was suggesting that journalists should speak truth to power. Which is the absolute fucking opposite of what George Hook did.

    Ah truth!
    Her truth? Maybe your truth?
    Explain what George did?
    George expressed his own opinion in the form of a question. What has that got to do with truth?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,973 ✭✭✭RayM


    Ah truth!
    Her truth? Maybe your truth?
    Explain what George did?
    George expressed his own opinion in the form of a question. What has that got to do with truth?

    It's already been done to death.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭ShowMeTheCash


    RayM wrote: »
    It's already been done to death.

    Regardless, it smacks of hypocrisy!

    If someone's opinion "triggers" you that much, her words not mine... But you want to take this route of "journalists should not be censored" then it becomes confusing. It is not about truth, there is literally no such thing you have ideas and opinions that is it.

    It is OK to disagree or to debate ideas, she did not want that, she wanted George off the airwaves. She got her wish however she has now met the same fate I would argue almost poetic!


Advertisement