Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Jury duty

  • 01-10-2017 9:16pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 885 ✭✭✭


    No doubt this has been asked before but I couldn't find the relevant thread(s).
    I recently got to read a jury summons. Included in it was a list of those ineligible, disqualified and able to be excused by right.
    It makes sense that those already involved in justice are ineligible. They may already have had dealings with the defendant or witnesses or may have to deal with them in the future. Those who can't read probably couldn't independently evaluate all the evidence. While an employee won't lose pay a student would likely have to repeat the year if they had to serve for a trial.
    Those disqualified, like those with serious criminal convictions, have already shown that they don't have much respect for law, society, etc.
    But what's with the list of professions given the right to excuse themselves? Civil Servants (but not public servants?), pilots? Ships captains? Why doctors, nurses, midwives and pharmacists but not physiotherapists, radiographers, social workers etc?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,857 ✭✭✭TheQuietFella


    Hail Mary, full of grace............


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 885 ✭✭✭Dingle_berry


    Hail Mary, full of grace............

    Them too, though non-denominational. I suppose they would be in a pickle if they heard confession or cave counsel and then had to sit on the jury...

    Or do you mean that the health care workers given the right to self excuse are the professions where the clergy traditionally double jobbed? Still doesn't make sense for pilots, ships captains or only civil servants?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,806 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    No doubt this has been asked before but I couldn't find the relevant thread(s).
    I recently got to read a jury summons. Included in it was a list of those ineligible, disqualified and able to be excused by right.
    It makes sense that those already involved in justice are ineligible. They may already have had dealings with the defendant or witnesses or may have to deal with them in the future. Those who can't read probably couldn't independently evaluate all the evidence. While an employee won't lose pay a student would likely have to repeat the year if they had to serve for a trial.
    Those disqualified, like those with serious criminal convictions, have already shown that they don't have much respect for law, society, etc.
    But what's with the list of professions given the right to excuse themselves? Civil Servants (but not public servants?), pilots? Ships captains? Why doctors, nurses, midwives and pharmacists but not physiotherapists, radiographers, social workers etc?

    Civil servants would make sense, the state prosecutes people, and they are employees of the state.

    Ships Captains could be away at seas for months.

    Doctors, Nurses might have a connection with any medical witness, or even come across the victim in the course of their duties.

    "Physiotherapists", will they cannot think/list every job in the universe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭snowflaker


    Not all Civil Servants are exempt, very few infact


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Why doctors, nurses, midwives and pharmacists but not physiotherapists, radiographers, social workers etc?
    A few things come to mind:
    * The first group are more likely to deal with intoxicated / anesthetised patients who may say things that compromise them in a criminal justice matter, whether what is said is accurate or not.
    * Removing the first group from work could potentially have a serious effect on the medical system, as the length of the trial is not fixed.
    * Some of them are well-connected professions. :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 885 ✭✭✭Dingle_berry


    Civil servants would make sense, the state prosecutes people, and they are employees of the state.
    So are public servants?
    Ships Captains could be away at seas for months.
    So are other professions - including other shipping professionals? Why airline pilots too? And when called for jury service it replaces your work.
    Doctors, Nurses might have a connection with any medical witness, or even come across the victim in the course of their duties.

    "Physiotherapists", will they cannot think/list every job in the universe.
    But care assistants, physiotherapists etc may also have a connection with medical witness or meet the victim/accused through the course of their duties? If you can't list all the professions exempt in an industry you'd just say employees of the x industry surely?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Hollister11


    I'm a student in my final year.

    If I was summoned I'd refuse, as I don't have time not spend doing college work.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭snowflaker


    The following persons if it is certified that their functions cannot reasonably be performed by another person or postponed; members of staff of either House of the Oireachtas, Heads of Government Departments, other civil servants, chief executive officers and employees of local authorities, Health Service Executive (HSE) Areas and harbour authorities, school teachers and university lecturers.

    Doesn't give an automatic exemption


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,067 ✭✭✭368100


    I think you get an exemption if you work in a different county to where you live...can anyone confirm?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭snowflaker


    I'm a student in my final year.

    If I was summoned I'd refuse, as I don't have time not spend doing college work.

    You're exempted anyway.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭snowflaker


    368100 wrote: »
    I think you get an exemption if you work in a different county to where you live...can anyone confirm?

    I don’t think so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 885 ✭✭✭Dingle_berry


    snowflaker wrote: »
    Doesn't give an automatic exemption

    In the summons it had 3 lists, list 3 was persons excusable as of right and listed practising medical practitioners, dentists, nurses, midwives, veterinary surgeons or pharmaceutical chemists. As well as Masters of vessels, duly licensed pilots and duly licensed aircraft commanders, the Secretary of the commissioners of irish lights.

    It just seems like an incomplete or odd mix of professions. No doubt there was some attempt at logic in the list, just can't see what it is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,907 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    I was called for jury duty several years ago and a large number of people on the first day just told the judge they couldn't do it for whatever reason, and the judge exempted them without issue. One persons mother was there to say that her daughter couldn't make is as she was going on holidays that morning and the judge was cool about it.

    It seems to me that although they have a list of exemptions on the summons, if you just tell the judge on the day that you cant/don't want to you'll be excused.


Advertisement