Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Granite dust or basalt dust.

  • 01-08-2017 1:29pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭


    Just wondering did anyone here use granite dust or it's little brother basalt dust on land and harrow it into the soil?

    I'm leaning towards basalt atm purely based on the likelihood of uranium in the granite. Or maybe that's the attraction for the bacteria.;)

    Any info from farmers or stone nuts greatly appreciated.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    How much would you apply? I'd be wary of spending much on it. Think about it, if you're soil is 20% clay that would mean you'd have over 250t of clay particles in the top 20cm/ha.
    They would contain an awful lot of minerals and I would think would be a lot easier to break down then basalt or granite would


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    How much would you apply? I'd be wary of spending much on it. Think about it, if you're soil is 20% clay that would mean you'd have over 250t of clay particles in the top 20cm/ha.
    They would contain an awful lot of minerals and I would think would be a lot easier to break down then basalt or granite would

    The thinking is that's it's a different kind of bacteria that breaks down granite and basalt and as it is exposed to water from rainfall as is normal in the soil and more bacteria more nematodes more food for plants. The finer it's ground the quicker it'll start working obviously.

    I'm going to do a bit of reseeding and it's recommended to harrow it in well into the soil so I might kill two birds.

    I saw a program on tg4 and they were in the deepest mine and they couldn't understand how bacteria were growing deep underground without food from organic matter. They came to the conclusion that the bacteria were feeding from minerals from the lava based rock that was never supposed to be at the ground surface e.g granite, when rainwater was running through cracks in the rock and the bacteria itself provided food for nematodes.

    Now the thing with lava from the earth is it should be the same as my post on seawater. Really it would be every known mineral on earth all melted up together and cooled below ground for granite and above ground for basalt. So the theory is if your land is lacking in a very minor mineral that you don't even know about the all included granite or basalt should provide that deficiency and some people think your land is only as strong as your weakest mineral. Putting back what you never had. Think rich volcanic soil.

    The thing that worries me about granite is the uranium part and that it dissolves into radon gas in the air and it also leaches with ground water. Not sure I need that.
    Basalt less likely as it was formed over ground so no radon gas trapped and no uranium. That said there was an Austrian farmer scientist who was using granite dust and was able to start selling his produce soon after the Chernobyl accident when all his neighbours were still locked up. The granite dust allowed uranium munching bacteria to grow on his farm before the accident and then when the accident occurred they quickly gobbled up any contamination and his land was clear while the rest of the country was still blocked. He had his own testing equipment and had all the figures before the accident.

    I think that jumbled mess of a post is most of what I grasp on it.

    Edit: was thinking 3t/ac and tilled in well before lime on top.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,566 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    I don't think you need to worry too much about uranium and radon gas as the amounts will probably be so small as to make no difference if it's a health point of view your thinking.

    Radon gas building up in an enclosed space like a house is an issue but that's because people stay in there for hours on end every day. Even then I think the risk is reduced by having windows open to properly air the place.

    In the field I don't think it could build up to any kind of level that would cause an issue. Also I think it would be a long slow release that would further reduce the risk.

    I could be wrong but I think you might be over thinking it although fair play for the research. I'd never heard of putting granite dust on land but your logic makes sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Mooooo


    You can come and take my stones here for free if you want, you'll have to collect yourself tho


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    Mooooo wrote: »
    You can come and take my stones here for free if you want, you'll have to collect yourself tho

    Nah don't want glow in the dark oul granite. I think I'd rather basalt and this is my trouble. I think all the basalt on the island is up around Antrim and the north.
    I wonder would any of the quarries deliver this far? 20t would do me. I may find out.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    I don't think you need to worry too much about uranium and radon gas as the amounts will probably be so small as to make no difference if it's a health point of view your thinking.

    Radon gas building up in an enclosed space like a house is an issue but that's because people stay in there for hours on end every day. Even then I think the risk is reduced by having windows open to properly air the place.

    In the field I don't think it could build up to any kind of level that would cause an issue. Also I think it would be a long slow release that would further reduce the risk.

    I could be wrong but I think you might be over thinking it although fair play for the research. I'd never heard of putting granite dust on land but your logic makes sense.

    Tend to overthink but it's better than not thinking at all.:D

    I read that the decaying granite releases the uranium in the ground water and since the granite would be ground so fine it would be bound to be released in the water. So not sure I want to jeopardise any future wells in the field.

    I see the epa did a study on drinking water and Wicklow was coming out fairly high and exceeding the European limits but some lower readings then allowed them not to issue a ban. The same for a public supply in Bagnelstown it was actually the highest in the country and they just barely allowed it. That's not to say there could be a high reading today and a bit lower when it's tested. So it's a problem I'd rather not make. That said maybe there's someone using it here and have no problems or using granite with no uranium?

    Maybe linked maybe not but around kiltealy and surrounds in the shadow of the exposed granite of blackstairs mountain and mount Leinster it would be a cancer hotspot. Not so much around the white mountain where there's a soil cover and it's planted with trees.
    Kiltealy and surrounds would be downwind of the mountains.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    pedigree 6 wrote: »
    Nah don't want glow in the dark oul granite. I think I'd rather basalt and this is my trouble. I think all the basalt on the island is up around Antrim and the north.
    I wonder would any of the quarries deliver this far? 20t would do me. I may find out.

    sure ya'd be up and back to my place by the time ya'd be hitting newry


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    ganmo wrote: »
    sure ya'd be up and back to my place by the time ya'd be hitting newry

    There's no basalt in Wicklow.
    Is there?

    Granite and quartzite I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    pedigree 6 wrote: »
    There's no basalt in Wicklow.
    Is there?

    Granite and quartzite I think.

    dublin ya !!

    ya its all granite


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭cute geoge


    Can we go back to the start here ???
    What in gods name is wrong with your land that granite or basalt is going to improve and has anything like this being tried before


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    cute geoge wrote: »
    Can we go back to the start here ???
    What in gods name is wrong with your land that granite or basalt is going to improve and has anything like this being tried before

    The internet. An endless journey with millions of billions of websites, chat rooms, forums, youtube, bookface, twitter, wikipedias. But mostly linked together by search engines that you can enter a word and millions of results come back.:)

    Anyway the spiel.:P




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,101 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    Ok that's the marketing. Is there anything peer reviewed to back it up?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    Ok that's the marketing. Is there anything peer reviewed to back it up?

    Simple answer. ??????

    Edit: some people don't know what lime is let alone use it. Or how it's made and differences in lime. But still. ???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,101 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    I understand that that's a fair point to a large degree but at the same time there has been so much research to back up lime over the years and while farmers may not be reading the research papers on it they are getting the push from independent research groups like Teagasc and UCD

    With a relatively unknown practice like this I would like to see some science to back it up.
    3 things in particular:
    1) does it actually increase bacteria numbers
    2) are these actually beneficial bacteria?
    3) does this actually lead to any improvement in yield or soil health?

    If you are going ahead with it maybe contact teagasc and let them know. There might be somebody interested in taking before and after soil samples. Be nice to validate what you're doing with some data


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 936 ✭✭✭st1979


    Roadstone at arklow rock is basalt and a bit of granite. Don't know if that is closer to you than antrim. Arklow rock apparently used to be a volcano


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1



    With a relatively unknown practice like this I would like to see some science to back it up.
    3 things in particular:
    1) does it actually increase bacteria numbers
    2) are these actually beneficial bacteria?
    3) does this actually lead to any improvement in yield or soil health?

    The easiest way to help there would be increase the amount of species in the sward (chicory, plantain, clovers etc, another grass or two if you really wanted to go mad), don't till and reduce artificial n


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,445 ✭✭✭Waffletraktor


    Would your soils not be shale/granite based in origin?
    Let us know if you get glow in the dark milk!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,101 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    Another thing crossed my mind. Limestone is slightly water soluble, I doubt granite is


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    Another thing crossed my mind. Limestone is slightly water soluble, I doubt granite is

    It is. Especially with our rain.

    Some granite monument stood for thousands of years in egypt and no damage. It was moved to London and within 200 years a lot of the features were smoothed out dissolved in the rain.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 936 ✭✭✭st1979


    pedigree 6 wrote:
    Some granite monument stood for thousands of years in egypt and no damage. It was moved to London and within 200 years a lot of the features were smoothed out dissolved in the rain.

    Is that not the fact that for thousands of years there was no industrial revolution then about 200yrs ago we had the industrial revolution causing acid rain.
    Which on a previous topic explains why we used to not need to apply sulphur but since we cleaned up our act re. smokeless coal and general emissions we now don't really have acidic rain.
    So you may of missed the boat on wanting rain to dissolve your granite.
    I would be very dubious of an economic benefit. Especially as roadstone in arklow is said to be some of the hardest rock in Europe. They used to export a lot of it to Germany on barges in the 80's due to it good wearing ability


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    Would your soils not be shale/granite based in origin?
    Let us know if you get glow in the dark milk!

    Shale where I am. So you could say plant based in origin.

    There's a whole row/line of hills volcanic in origin from slieve coilte at kennedy park up to arklow alright but not sure it would have effected the soil here.
    Blackstairs granite would be behind me as well but even from some residue brought here by glaciation I'd say that would be used by now.

    Another case from someone close to the mountain lately diagnosed with cancer.
    There's a townsland not far from here just beneath the blackstairs mountain and I'd say every household there had someone with cancer either treated or died from it.
    Some people were blaming the rte transmitter on mt Leinster but these are too far from it. I'd blame the granite especially after reading about uranium dissolving into the groundwater in Bagnelstown. So it is in the granite here.
    And the one thing all these incidents of cancer have in common is the proximity to the blackstairs.

    :rolleyes:

    Edit: just to get it all of my chest and be done with it. After Chernobyl the dept here were testing for uranium and the Wicklow mountains were coming back very high. So they said it came from Chernobyl and maybe some did. But the readings were still high after and not reducing. They had to admit after that it was just normal readings for the area and from the granite mountains.
    So now who wants to build a house made from granite?:p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    Ok that's the marketing. Is there anything peer reviewed to back it up?

    This is the best I've found yet....

    http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652006000400009
    So it seems basalt is better than Granite dust ( why are some people going on about granite dust then :rolleyes: ) and for it to be made available faster, mixing with composted plants, dung, speeds it up - Just like the organic vegetable growers are doing.
    Another point it acts as a soil pH improver.

    So sin è.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    It is actually perfect for mixing into dungheaps. The heat and moisture of the heap would release the nutrients from the basalt dust and so should be available straight away when spreading the dung. Where as just mixing it into the soil it would only start releasing the nutrients in warm and moist conditions in the summer. So would be a longer term thing then. Then the question mark is would it be warm enough in the soil for this to happen?

    The Seer centre in Aberdeenshire where they were using basalt dust were using it in their compost and then using that compost for their vegetables.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    It's the same theme so i'll stick it in this thread.

    But this book was published in 1894.
    You've probably heard other people mention this, Gerald Potterton in the journal for one. It's an interesting read and I don't think it would do anyone any harm to read it.

    "Bread from Stones".
    http://soilandhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/01aglibrary/010173.hensel.pdf

    It'll pass a few minutes if nothing else.


Advertisement