Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

House being sold with huge structural problem

  • 05-07-2017 12:17am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,800 ✭✭✭


    Hypothetical situation.
    House next door had a large number of cracks on the outside walls, owners removed the whole outer leaf on atleast one side and once that was finished the house was plastered, painted, cracks filled and went straight on the market.
    House ages would coincidence with Mica problem in brick, but purely speculation.

    Is it right that these people could hide a possible problem like this and then fob the house off to an unsuspecting buyer.
    I don't think Mica would be caught by an engineer if all the cracks are resently plastered over and painted.
    This is all speculation and it none of the neighbours business, but if you lived next door, would you do something, and if so what?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭C3PO


    A lot of speculative speculation going on there!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Next door? Might you (hypothetically) have the same problem?

    A good surveyor would wonder why an old brick house had just been plastered....


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Removing the whole outer leaf on one side of a house is a huge structural undertaking.... One which would need extra internal structural temporary works to stop the house falling down.

    If someone wanted to be cheap and hide cracks, that's not the route they would go down.

    Any surveyor worth his salt would be able to recognise such drastic remedial works anyway.

    I have done many pre purchase reports on houses, and when I see newly painted ceilings / walls etc my alarm bells start to ring.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,378 ✭✭✭CeilingFly


    even a junior engineer will see that it has recently been rendered and will investigate.

    But your post is total speculation with no actual basis and with "catastrophe syndrome" added.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,926 ✭✭✭davo10


    Home owner does improvements before selling to increase appearance and value, that's pretty common. If this is in the NW, in the area of that quarry which was alledgedly selling defective blocks (prime time programme about it), the surveyors will be well aware of what to look out for. Also, that programme showed that defects are not restricted to outer structure, the blocks crumbled causing huge internal cracks and gaps. That's not something you can skim over with plaster.

    I made a builder remove the plaster/outer leaf on the front of a house I built because he made a complete helms of it, that was 10 years ago, not even a hairline crack since.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,800 ✭✭✭Senna


    As I said hypothetical question and I think the answer is any survey at all would pick it up, so that basically covers any concerns.

    That primetime program showed the worst and at the early stages, there was no cracking inside on some houses with it, certainly no more than any house with a few settlement cracks.

    I think it effects 5000+ houses, so I'm sure there are a few people trying to hide it and sell the house on to some unsuspecting buyer.


Advertisement