Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What cross makes the best ewe?

  • 03-06-2017 9:17pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,381 ✭✭✭


    In your opinion.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭Sheep breeder


    The ewe that rears two lambs and no feed and no dosing and no shearing and no lameness and her lambs make 300 euros each and looks real fancy!!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,381 ✭✭✭DJ98


    The ewe that rears two lambs and no feed and no dosing and no shearing and no lameness and her lambs make 300 euros each and looks real fancy!!!!!

    In a realistic world


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,239 ✭✭✭Willfarman


    i have nearly every cross of the mainstream breeds here. suffolk cheviot blackface charolais texel lyen belclare vendeen...... which are best? my feelings these days are who the **** knows.. all i know is they are all woolly vermin!!

    they are hardship regardless what colour head they have.. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,175 ✭✭✭Kevhog1988


    Im going to be buying suffolk or Suffolk x belclare


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭stantheman1979


    Depends on the system I guess but everyone is going to have they're own preferences. We've tried to breed a maternal flock mainly belclare, lleyn and Romney. Some fellas would laugh at me but it works for us. Another man I know reckons you're at nothing unless there's a horned ewe somewhere in the breeding


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,175 ✭✭✭Kevhog1988


    Depends on the system I guess but everyone is going to have they're own preferences. We've tried to breed a maternal flock mainly belclare, lleyn and Romney. Some fellas would laugh at me but it works for us. Another man I know reckons you're at nothing unless there's a horned ewe somewhere in the breeding
    how prolific are the romneys? Was looking at them but read they rarely give doubles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭stantheman1979


    At the moment we're crossing Romney rams onto belclare and lleyn ewes to try have a lower maintenance flock but try keep the prolifically of the belclare. Early stages to judge but signs are good. Lost a lot less lambs this yr about 6%. Ewes have more milk and better mothering ability. We scanned 1.85 this yr but hoping to push it higher next year. Time will tell!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,497 ✭✭✭rangler1


    At the moment we're crossing Romney rams onto belclare and lleyn ewes to try have a lower maintenance flock but try keep the prolifically of the belclare. Early stages to judge but signs are good. Lost a lot less lambs this yr about 6%. Ewes have more milk and better mothering ability. We scanned 1.85 this yr but hoping to push it higher next year. Time will tell!!

    Yea, you need the belclare influence, for maternal ability and prolificacy,
    You mightn't think it but you have a nice scanning rate there, losses will go up with increased scanning rate and a scanning rate of 2 two mightn't yeild that many more lambs in the field


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭stantheman1979


    I fully understand where you're coming from rangler. Higher scanning rates mean more multiples. Which is more meal and more also more smaller lambs to deal with and more work but I think we could push it a little bit higher. Like everyone I don't want quads but If I could just have less singles it would mean less adoptions which would cut down work also. I've a machine to rear the triplets and it's no bother training them on it.


Advertisement