Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Exo-atmospheric Killer

  • 31-05-2017 4:01pm
    #1
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,336 CMod ✭✭✭✭


    Ballistic missile interceptor. Launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base. California. Destroyed simulated incoming ICBM-like target. Part of Ground-based Midcourse Defense, USA. They played bumper cars. Collided with object in space. Successful test. But reliability against real targets might not be achieved for years. US_BMD_System-source-PacificSentinel.jpg


Comments

  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,563 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/31/pentagon_trumpets_successful_mockicbm_interception_test/
    As Martin Pfieffer, who Tweets as @NuclearAnthro, put it: “Now do it with one flying faster, carrying chaff, and of unknown launch & trajectory.”

    It's yet another prepared missile test. Remember the Patriot missile system had major software bugs. In some case it tried to intercept Iraqi Scuds on a trajectory that would take it below ground level.

    Also relevant - the US and Soviet Union had an treaty limiting anti-ballistic measures back in 1972. The rational was that if one side could stop a retaliatory strike then could launch a first strike with impunity. Which the Hawks would love. :(
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Ballistic_Missile_Treaty


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,528 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    Also relevant - the US and Soviet Union had an treaty limiting anti-ballistic measures back in 1972. The rational was that if one side could stop a retaliatory strike then could launch a first strike with impunity. Which the Hawks would love.
    I recall reading about that Cold War arms race between the USSR (CCCP) and Ronald Reagan. Given that the US withdrew from the treaty June 2002 they are now experimenting with this current device.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,336 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    North Korea increased missile testing. Passed 2016 tests. 10 total in 2016. Now 12 in 2017. Only half year. More to come? NK tests providing motivation for US testing of exo-atmospheric killer vehicle?


Advertisement