Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

500-year lease & groundrent in 1970s housing estate

  • 16-05-2017 11:07pm
    #1
    Posts: 0


    I've gone sale agreed on a house, have had the relevant engineer, architect etc out and I'm getting close to completion. However, today the solicitor threw a spanner in the works by telling me that this house, which was built in the 1970s (1970s, not 1870s), is not freehold.

    Instead, I will be taking out a 500-year lease, will have to pay some sort of ground rent to a 'landlord' and have a number of restrictions on what I can do to it.

    I am in disbelief, and the first thing is why does Myhome/Daft etc not have to disclose that on advertisements for houses rather than potential purchasers getting so far into the process (at no little expense to themselves) before they find out that they are "buying" a house where they will be a tenant/not own it freehold? Is that lack of disclosure on something so fundamental not illegal?

    While I expect some sort of restrictions in the event of buying into an apartment complex, and I might expect some sort of archaic ground rent obligation if a house were part of some old Anglo-Irish estate, I had never heard of an entire modern housing estate not being freehold and being subject to such archaic property laws. Is this property title common in housing estates built after 1922 in Dublin/Ireland? On a side note, I am also absolutely fascinated about who could possibly be the "landlord" of this entire estate. Why on earth is Irish law accepting the existence of such outdated property laws in 2017?

    I had read those stories of Lord Lucan not being paid his ground rent until he turned up to collect it in person, but I never expected this to be the case for a house in a modern estate in Dublin.

    I could walk away now, even after spending much time and money checking out this house. It does tick all the right boxes, but signing up to restrictions on what I can do to the house, and paying a rent - even if nominal - is the very reason I have avoided purchasing in an apartment complex. Aside from walking away, what are my options? Could I ever convert this to freehold, and how much more expense would this add to the Celtic Tiger house price I'm already paying? (a special thank you to the Fine Gael party on this for making it easier for people to borrow more money and thus directly being responsible for increasing the price of this house by some €50,000 in the space of 7 months)

    And again: why are Irish legislators in this republic in 2017 still facilitating this archaic nonsense? I thought McDowell was blowing years ago about how advanced he was for repealing numerous laws from centuries ago. url=http://www.irishtimes.com/news/new-bill-to-reform-law-on-land-and-conveyancing-1.1014690]'New Bill to reform law on land and conveyancing' (2006)[/url. Is there any hope of this system being ended?


Comments

Advertisement