Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

shorter cranks

  • 04-04-2017 2:45pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16


    What are your thoughts in using shorter cranks? For example, I am 1m65cm and I was recommended to ride 165mm cranks. I tried them and find that there is no great benefit from using them in road races / time trials. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,235 ✭✭✭✭Cee-Jay-Cee


    I have 175mm cranks on my MTB and find them better than the 172.5 cranks on my road bikes. Maybe its my imagination but I think I can get more leverage with the longer crank and find climbing out of the saddle easier on the longer cranks however in my case its very difficult to properly compare as the bikes are vastly different. I cant see any benefit to shorter cranks, especially if you consider yourself a spinner rather than a grinder.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 859 ✭✭✭StevieGriff


    I have 175mm cranks on my MTB and find them better than the 172.5 cranks on my road bikes. Maybe its my imagination but I think I can get more leverage with the longer crank and find climbing out of the saddle easier on the longer cranks however in my case its very difficult to properly compare as the bikes are vastly different. I cant see any benefit to shorter cranks, especially if you consider yourself a spinner rather than a grinder.
    Here's a fairly good summary by Cervelo of a study done on crank length a few years back. Interesting stuff, basically surmises that comfort and practically is the most important factor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,971 ✭✭✭fat bloke


    Weepsie wrote: »
    If you have about €1000 you can also buy the Look Zed crankset which lets you change the length to one of 3 options.

    Cripes you'd buy three dura ace cranks for a grand though.

    I messed around with 165's last year after years on 172.5 & to be honest noticed absolutely no difference whatsoever. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 718 ✭✭✭gaffmaster


    I'm 169cm tall and online fit calculators (like this Zinn one) say I should have 161mm cranks.

    I'm currently running 170's on both of my road bikes. I get lower back pain and tight hip flexors. I have read that shorter cranks can help alleviate these issues as you're not making the angle of your hips quite as acute at the top of the pedal stroke. I've yet to be able to afford the upgrade to 165's. A club-mate of mine who's exactly the same height as me has 165's on his track bike and finds them a lot more comfortable.

    Any extra leverage a larger lever would give you, I'd imagine might be lost if your muscles have been positioned beyond their most powerful range of motion. In other words, a bigger dead-spot at the top of the rotation? That's just my interpretation, and could be wrong.

    OP - when you changed to 165 cranks, did you raise your saddle by 5mm? You might also need to move it back a touch as well depending on seat-tube angle. This should help reduce that acute angle even further, as well as make you more aero = double win!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,971 ✭✭✭fat bloke


    gaffmaster wrote: »
    . I've yet to be able to afford the upgrade to 165's.

    I just went with cheapy tiagra 165's for the experiment. 70 quid online.
    Still use em on the turbo.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 718 ✭✭✭gaffmaster


    fat bloke wrote: »
    I just went with cheapy tiagra 165's for the experiment. 70 quid online.
    Still use em on the turbo.

    Not a bad idea. I actually got a free set of 165 Gossamers but they're BB30 and won't fit my bikes!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79 ✭✭Shoco83


    I switched to 165 on both my bikes after getting a bike fit. The main reason for the recommendation was the tight hips, so as mentioned above the hip angle doesn't close as much as the 12 o'clock position, I think my cadence has also increased as a result of the change. If I'm honest I don't find a massive difference between them and what was 170mm

    I do have a third bike that I keep on the turbo with 170 cranks, and on occasions I have felt a bit of discomfort in the hip if really pushing it, so I guess there is a benefit to the change


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16 Classyrider


    OP - when you changed to 165 cranks, did you raise your saddle by 5mm? You might also need to move it back a touch as well depending on seat-tube angle. This should help reduce that acute angle even further, as well as make you more aero = double win!

    Yes i made the adjustments with the shorter cranks after my bike fit...they did not suit at all. They feel wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,419 ✭✭✭NeedMoreGears


    I am also 165cm and had to replace cranks recently. I went for 165mm tiagras instead of the 170mm that I had been using. I raised the seat 5mm to compensate. I can't say I've noticed any difference at all, even in the small ring/biggest gear combo where the small loss of leverage cannot be compensated by gear selection.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 119 ✭✭DKmac


    Adam Hansen of Lotto Soudal uses 180mm cranks on the advice of a mechanical engineer.

    http://pelotonmagazine.com/travel-culture/from-inside-peloton-adam-hansen/


  • Advertisement
Advertisement