Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

German Twitch streamers to require broadcasting licence

Options
  • 28-03-2017 1:41pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 16,931 ✭✭✭✭


    Didn't see any mention of this here yet.

    It seems similarly to Ireland and RTE getting very flustered over people wanting to consume all their media need online, the Germans are also coming up with nonsense means to deal with it.

    TL;DR version is that Twitch streamers with over 500 viewers under German legislation are to be considered broadcasters and require a licence which can cost between €1,000-10,000. If they fail to procure a licence they are being considered pirate broadcasters and will be prosecuted.



    Personally I think it's a bit ridiculous.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 358 ✭✭noel100


    Didn't see any mention of this here yet.

    It seems similarly to Ireland and RTE getting very flustered over people wanting to consume all their media need online, the Germans are also coming up with nonsense means to deal with it.

    TL;DR version is that Twitch streamers with over 500 viewers under German legislation are to be considered broadcasters and require a licence which can cost between €1,000-10,000. If they fail to procure a licence they are being considered pirate broadcasters and will be prosecuted.



    Personally I think it's a bit ridiculous.

    Does that mean they are entitled to participate the broadcasting license .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,400 ✭✭✭me_irl


    I don't think you needed the "tl;dr version" :pac:

    What if they're behind seven proxies (sorry, couldn't resist).

    What is the actual German source on this other than this guy with an Audible sponsorship? I checked the description on his video and there's nothing linked.

    It could be just some German version of Waterford Whispers / The Onion that was misconstrued?

    But if it's true, it's absolute bull.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,847 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    noel100 wrote: »
    Does that mean they are entitled to participate the broadcasting license .
    almost definitely no chance .

    Still, they have 300,000 subscribers on you tube with then millions of views of their content, so thats more of a reach than some "real" broadcasters.

    You'd presume with that reach that they have plenty of income from clicks and from sponsorship that the cost of a license wouldnt kill them to have to pay.

    And, seeing as they are acting commercially anyhow, the cost of the licence would be tax deductable as a cost of their business

    EDIT: yes, im also a stickler for getting a source or GTF out of here..... so heres the website of the most popular german IT magazine with the article
    https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Twitch-Stream-als-Rundfunkangebot-Medienanstalten-nehmen-PietSmietTV-ins-Visier-3661705.html
    also here on the german equivalent of the irish times, paper of record
    http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/medien/youtube-kollektiv-piet-smiet-tv-soll-rundfunklizenz-beantragen-14937681.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,931 ✭✭✭✭challengemaster


    almost definitely no chance .

    Still, they have 300,000 subscribers on you tube with then millions of views of their content, so thats more of a reach than some "real" broadcasters.

    You'd presume with that reach that they have plenty of income from clicks and from sponsorship that the cost of a license wouldnt kill them to have to pay.

    And, seeing as they are acting commercially anyhow, the cost of the licence would be tax deductable as a cost of their business

    The ones they're targeting as the initial case - Piet Smiet TV - do have that reach and income levels. But once there's a precedent set then they're free to apply this to every twitch streamer who has 500+ viewers at any given time. Most of which wouldn't have the means to pay.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,847 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    The ones they're targeting as the initial case - Piet Smiet TV - do have that reach and income levels. But once there's a precedent set then they're free to apply this to every twitch streamer who has 500+ viewers at any given time. Most of which wouldn't have the means to pay.
    its not a precedent, its existing law now being implemented.

    the 500 user limit is in there :
    http://www.gesetze-bayern.de/Content/Document/RFunkStVertr

    its all there in one nice complete document, so its literally all there in black and white to be read by anyone looking to offer a broadcasting service .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,847 ✭✭✭munchkin_utd


    and no sooner have I posted those links, the Frankfurter Allgemeine (again, as near to the likes of the irish times as you get in Germany) has another analysis piece stating that this is the beginning of a wider strategy by the broadcasting regulators which will eventually end up in an attempt to licence facebook live videos and the likes .

    So, yea, its an attempt to set an enforceable precedent of the existing law with which they will then use to regulate internet content in a much wider way .

    "First the gamers, then the internet"
    http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/rundfunklizenz-fuer-youtuber-14945278.html

    The law is there to be implemented so theres not a fierce amount that can be done to stop it, except change the law or hope that a very very smart defense laywer can twist the definition of what is a broadcast and whats a service.


Advertisement