Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Car Remapped, but seems slow, bad remap?

  • 01-03-2017 3:18pm
    #1
    NeoSD5
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72 ✭✭


    Hi guys,

    Just got the remap done on my e60 lci 177hp. Seems faster, however doing 0-100 km/h will end up in 8 seconds, that's the best figure I could get.
    And the stock is 8.3 seconds. Car was mapped to 210 bhp with a print out on dyno. So what could be the problem? False figures? Bad remap?
    Also sometimes there is a lag on turbo kick from 2000/2200 rpm? Is this a bad map? Any help, appreciate
    Tagged:


Comments

  • #2
    tossy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,594 ✭✭✭tossy


    NeoSD5 wrote: »
    Hi guys,

    Just got the remap done on my e60 lci 177hp. Seems faster, however doing 0-100 km/h will end up in 8 seconds, that's the best figure I could get.
    And the stock is 8.3 seconds. Car was mapped to 210 bhp with a print out on dyno. So what could be the problem? False figures? Bad remap?
    Also sometimes there is a lag on turbo kick from 2000/2200 rpm? Is this a bad map? Any help, appreciate

    0-60 times aren't the best measure of a map, the dyno print out you have is more reliable.

    The stock 0-60 times quoted are done in ideal conditions by professional drivers, either way i reckon you've knocked 0.5 of a second of that time which is more than adequate value for money,what were you expecting ?


  • #3
    NeoSD5
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72 ✭✭NeoSD5


    tossy wrote: »
    0-60 times aren't the best measure of a map, the dyno print out you have is more reliable.

    The stock 0-60 times quoted are done in ideal conditions by professional drivers, either way i reckon you've knocked 0.5 of a second of that time which is more than adequate value for money,what were you expecting ?


    I was expecting 7 sec, I know guys who done it after remap, proved. So thought something gone wrong


  • #4
    Paddy@CIRL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭Paddy@CIRL


    You're not going to be setting world records at this time of the year with cold roads and cold tyres.


Advertisement