Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

TB testing info?

  • 16-02-2017 4:29pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 106 ✭✭


    i had a tb test in the middle of november and i had 1 cow come up as inconclusive, so i chose to get her retested in 30 days... she came up inconclusive again so was seen as a reactor and taken away and slaughtered on the 3rd of janurary. so now i have to have 2 clear tests 330 days apart. i had a reactor re-test on the 19 of janurary. i said to the vet inspector isnt it too soon. he said no its 60 days from when she first came up as inconclusive. now today i rang the department and they are saying my second reactor re-test will be on the 3rd may! i was thinking another 30 days since the last test. they are now saying the first test was done too soon etc etc. my heads wrecked with this crowd.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,611 ✭✭✭Mooooo


    mrbrendank wrote: »
    i had a tb test in the middle of november and i had 1 cow come up as inconclusive, so i chose to get her retested in 30 days... she came up inconclusive again so was seen as a reactor and taken away and slaughtered on the 3rd of janurary. so now i have to have 2 clear tests 330 days apart. i had a reactor re-test on the 19 of janurary. i said to the vet inspector isnt it too soon. he said no its 60 days from when she first came up as inconclusive. now today i rang the department and they are saying my second reactor re-test will be on the 3rd may! i was thinking another 30 days since the last test. they are now saying the first test was done too soon etc etc. my heads wrecked with this crowd.

    It's 2 clear tests 120 days from when the animal left the farm not the date of previous test, generally done 60 days apart. If the second test is around the 120 days after the animal left thats the important part I'd say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 968 ✭✭✭Count Mondego


    And after your two clear tests, they'll land at least two tests every year for the next few years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,313 ✭✭✭TITANIUM.


    After you get your second clear test your free to sell. For a period of about 3to4 months anyway then you are locked up again from selling as you enter what's now called the post clearence testing regime until you complete that test. WALOS


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    TITANIUM. wrote: »
    After you get your second clear test your free to sell. For a period of about 3to4 months anyway then you are locked up again from selling as you enter what's now called the post clearence testing regime until you complete that test. WALOS

    If i understand that correctly and I probably do knowing the geniuses that come up with the rules then after 2 clear tests your cattle present no more risk than anybody else's.
    However 3-4 months later based on nothing more than the calender they are sufficiently high risk to warrant being locked up again.
    Is it because they think reactors might show up 6-8 months after the reactor was taken away in which case you could've been spreading reactors around the country for 3 or 4 months.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 9,041 Mod ✭✭✭✭greysides


    If i understand that correctly and I probably do knowing the geniuses that come up with the rules then after 2 clear tests your cattle present no more risk than anybody else's.
    However 3-4 months later based on nothing more than the calender they are sufficiently high risk to warrant being locked up again.
    Is it because they think reactors might show up 6-8 months after the reactor was taken away in which case you could've been spreading reactors around the country for 3 or 4 months.

    Once upon a time, in a land separated from us only by time, a TB test was deemed to be dependable for only two months. Then suddenly, with the stroke of a pen, as a carrot to get farmers to pay for testing, the very same test was now dependable for 12 months. How the **** could that be justified biologically or statistically? Only politically.

    As I understand it, too many herds were going down on six month tests after their clearance test. Herds won't have to test for 6 months but if they want to sell after three months they will have to test then.

    The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress. Joseph Joubert

    The ultimate purpose of debate is not to produce consensus. It's to promote critical thinking.

    Adam Grant



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,313 ✭✭✭TITANIUM.


    If i understand that correctly and I probably do knowing the geniuses that come up with the rules then after 2 clear tests your cattle present no more risk than anybody else's.
    However 3-4 months later based on nothing more than the calender they are sufficiently high risk to warrant being locked up again.
    Is it because they think reactors might show up 6-8 months after the reactor was taken away in which case you could've been spreading reactors around the country for 3 or 4 months.

    Don't bother trying to understand it J.O. Tis a load of sh1te,
    You'd wonder do many of these cattle that "Go down" have TB atall.


Advertisement