Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

House near water body

Options
  • 02-02-2017 1:01pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 113 ✭✭


    We viewed and very much liked a house in Dublin. This house happens to be near a small stream. The stream had flooded when the floods hit the country last year. Since then the banks have been raised and a new wall has been built to avoid flooding.

    I called up chill insurance and they said that they wont provide full insure cover for a house within 200m of a water body. The cover would exclude floods

    My mortgage broker advised to stay away from bidding for this house as without full insurance the bank wont lend

    Does anyone have a similar experience or suggestions?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,684 ✭✭✭✭Samuel T. Cogley


    Your broker is almost certainly correct in this regard.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,499 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    If the house itself hasn't recently been flooded (only land outside) there are insurers who will insure in these cases but they are painfully expensive. You need to use a traditional insurance broker, not someone like Chill.

    If it has flooded itself, it is presumably cheap and for good reason - cash buyer only. Banks won't lend on uninsurable properties.


  • Registered Users Posts: 113 ✭✭smpillai11


    L1011 wrote: »
    If the house itself hasn't recently been flooded (only land outside) there are insurers who will insure in these cases but they are painfully expensive. You need to use a traditional insurance broker, not someone like Chill.

    If it has flooded itself, it is presumably cheap and for good reason - cash buyer only. Banks won't lend on uninsurable properties.

    Thanks. The house itself hasn't flooded. I called up a couple of traditional insurers and they the house is in a flood risk area and declined to provide cover. I will call up some more and see


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,499 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    You'll be calling all of them and getting the same reply. (proper) Broker is the only way to go for anything awkward. You could easily get cover from an insurer that refused you on the phone.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,684 ✭✭✭✭Samuel T. Cogley


    Also bear in mind that even if you get insurance the banks valuer might throw up concerns.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 517 ✭✭✭Varta


    There are numerous properties next to watercourses, especially in Dublin. As usual, Irish insurers pick and choose and most of them won't insure - even if you live 20 stories above the waterline! FBD is one insurance company that will (they insure my riverside property) on the basis that the property has not flooded previously. The premium is no different than average for the type of house. Some people panic when they hear the word watercourse, but the fact is that there are many properties in Dublin within 200 metres of a watercourse that won't ever be flooded until at least half the city is under water. Height above water level is what counts not distance.


  • Registered Users Posts: 113 ✭✭smpillai11


    Varta wrote: »
    There are numerous properties next to watercourses, especially in Dublin. As usual, Irish insurers pick and choose and most of them won't insure - even if you live 20 stories above the waterline! FBD is one insurance company that will (they insure my riverside property) on the basis that the property has not flooded previously. The premium is no different than average for the type of house. Some people panic when they hear the word watercourse, but the fact is that there are many properties in Dublin within 200 metres of a watercourse that won't ever be flooded until at least half the city is under water. Height above water level is what counts not distance.


    Yes, the 200 metres rules is very silly, should be level based. I will try calling FBD tomorrow. thanks


  • Registered Users Posts: 113 ✭✭smpillai11


    FBD go to Zurich for insurance. Zurich already said they wont cover floods


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,601 ✭✭✭cerastes


    While I get where insurers are coming from, theres a certain amount of ridiculousness to this, given that most urban areas developed over centuries beside watercourses, surely its still possible to get them to be obliged to cover with conditions on flooding, otherwise what is everyone to do? abandon all properties near watercourses.
    Personally I wouldnt buy near a watercourse for this reason (if I had the means to buy), but what do all the people who have properties that were planning approved and are beside watercourses actually do for insurance??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 517 ✭✭✭Varta


    smpillia11, I just checked my FBD policy documents and there is no mention of Zurich. When I took out the cover the only question I was asked regarding flood risk was "As far as you are aware has the property ever been flooded?". I was honestly able to say that the house has never been flooded. As I said, I believe my premium is very competitive.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,499 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    smpillai11 wrote: »
    FBD go to Zurich for insurance. Zurich already said they wont cover floods

    FBD *are* an insurer. Not a tied agent

    Go to a broker. Call centers will not be able to offer all options


Advertisement