Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How long would it take to start making savings if I changed my old oil burner for a c

  • 01-02-2017 1:44pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,184 ✭✭✭✭


    As per title, if I changed my 16yr old oil burner (regularly serviced, going well) to a new condensing one, how much would it save me annually approx?

    Is it even a wise thing to consider?


Comments

  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭DGOBS


    10% for boiler only change.
    Look at your controls also for more.

    But first money I would spend would be insulations, then a bit more insulation, and finally more insulation......
    (maybe another bit of isolation if there's any money left)

    Remember, if the house easily looses heat, to keep the heat you put in would be the best return on investment.
    Then once thats all sorted, then start thinking about your boiler and controls upgrade to reduce bills even further.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭agusta


    It depends on what your make your old boiler was and if your new boiler has been sized correctly etc..,On average the new boiler should be saving you 15 to 20 percent in your pocket in my opinion


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 6,470 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wearb


    Because new Condensing boilers rarely stay in condensing all the time, I would go with the 10% mentioned above. That is for a straight boiler swap and not any controls upgrade, which could be done either way.

    Btw, you mention that existing one is serviced regularly; what reading are on the printout that you got with last service?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 871 ✭✭✭TPM


    NIMAN wrote: »
    As per title, if I changed my 16yr old oil burner (regularly serviced, going well) to a new condensing one, how much would it save me annually approx?

    Is it even a wise thing to consider?

    how much are you spending on oil a year at the moment?
    as stated above you are looking at 10-20% savings, this gives your potential saving per year.
    next get some quotes for new boiler and heating control upgrade there are grants and carbon credit allowances you may be eligible for (be careful with the heating control grant with some older systems it can be overly expensive to install heating controls that meet the requirements)

    but basically if you currently spend €2000 on oil and the upgrades cost you €2000 it could be 10 years before you cover the cost of the installation


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    The other side of it is that the OP's boiler is going to fail eventually or require a significant repair.

    Still, getting the house as insulated as possible is probably the best way to make a saving.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,184 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Thanks folks.

    I had been looking at better insulation recently.

    I only asked about the condenser as I seen one for sale locally that was less than a year old, I was wondering if it might have been worth buying and changing my old one out.

    The guy was selling for half price as he had changed to gas.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,943 ✭✭✭MicktheMan


    DGOBS wrote: »
    But first money I would spend would be insulations, then a bit more insulation, and finally more insulation......
    (maybe another bit of isolation if there's any money left)

    Remember, if the house easily looses heat, to keep the heat you put in would be the best return on investment.

    Still, getting the house as insulated as possible is probably the best way to make a saving.
    NIMAN wrote: »

    I had been looking at better insulation recently.
    Folks,
    while you are correct on investing to reduce heat loss from the house, spending on more insulation rarely gives much bang for the buck. In the majority of cases the heat is lost by convection (i.e. air leakage, aka draughts) and not conduction. Insulation acts as a resister in the flow of heat through a solid material but does little to restrict air flow. Very few insulation materials have any impact on convection heat loss and therefore can often be a waste of effort and money.

    TLDR; It ain't all about insulation:)


Advertisement