Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Should local rural stations get a slice of the tv licence fee ?

  • 31-12-2016 5:04pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 184 ✭✭


    John Purcell is lobbying for local rural radio stations to get some of the license fee, the argument is that these stations provide vital public service broadcasting to their regions, particularly to older listeners but that the days of making money by selling advertising to Mike's Hardware store and Mary's school uniform shop are over.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,260 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    This old chestnut.

    7% of the Licence Fee currently goes to the BAI. Every single independent radio station is entitled to apply for some of this 7%. The funding can come from two main sources. There is the Sound Vision fund and is to assist in the making and commissioning of of documentary shows, educational programmes, heritage project or to make dramas, and the Archive Scheme for preserving broadcasting heritage and programme content. There is a BAI sponsorship scheme as well but it isn't for programming per se.

    In conclusion the cash is already available but it's just not there to help pay for DJ wages, flash playout computers or fleets of branded SUVs to carry car stickers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,986 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    I heard two programs on Northern Sound last week which they said had been funded by the licence fee. One of them was a two hour documentary about the death of Maurice Gibson in a IRA bomb. There was a lot of input from the three rugby internationals who were injured in the explosion.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Gibson


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 184 ✭✭The Parish priest


    This old chestnut.

    7% of the Licence Fee currently goes to the BAI. Every single independent radio station is entitled to apply for some of this 7%. The funding can come from two main sources. There is the Sound Vision fund and is to assist in the making and commissioning of of documentary shows, educational programmes, heritage project or to make dramas, and the Archive Scheme for preserving broadcasting heritage and programme content. There is a BAI sponsorship scheme as well but it isn't for programming per se.

    In conclusion the cash is already available but it's just not there to help pay for DJ wages, flash playout computers or fleets of branded SUVs to carry car stickers.

    Would you agree tho that the old reliable sources of income that these small stations had like advertising for small business, classified ads and 30 cent sms requests has likely collapsed ?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,402 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Would you agree tho that the old reliable sources of income that these small stations had like advertising for small business, classified ads and 30 cent sms requests has likely collapsed ?
    Would you agree that the ice sellers who sell ice blocks for you to put in the cellar no longer have a market due to refrigeration?

    Either they move on with the times or they get to shut down like everything else; if they are so dear to the local population then said population can by all means pay to keep it running since "it's so important to them" according to you. However I bet if you ask them if they wish to fund it or have it shut down the answer is going to be in the second category over having to actually pay their fair cost for the service.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,009 ✭✭✭✭wnolan1992


    Increasing funding to Sound and Vision fund and broaden the criteria for applications to same. I think stations should get money for covering local sport and cultural events and making programmes which RTE cannot do.

    They should not, IMO, automatically just be entitled to a slice of the licence fee. They're commercial organisations owned and operated as businesses by private individuals and companies, if they can't make a profit from it, that's their problem tbh.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,260 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    Would you agree tho that the old reliable sources of income that these small stations had like advertising for small business, classified ads and 30 cent sms requests has likely collapsed ?

    I can answer that by asking you another question.

    How many (licenced) Irish stations have had to close due to finances?


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    This old chestnut.

    7% of the Licence Fee currently goes to the BAI. Every single independent radio station is entitled to apply for some of this 7%. The funding can come from two main sources. There is the Sound Vision fund and is to assist in the making and commissioning of of documentary shows, educational programmes, heritage project or to make dramas, and the Archive Scheme for preserving broadcasting heritage and programme content. There is a BAI sponsorship scheme as well but it isn't for programming per se.

    In conclusion the cash is already available but it's just not there to help pay for DJ wages, flash playout computers or fleets of branded SUVs to carry car stickers.

    That's a nonsense argument because RTÉ, who get a large majority of the licence fee as it is, can also apply for Sound and Vision funding.

    The independent sector also have a broadcasting levy which can cost from 6 to 7 figures depending on the stations income.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,428 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Faugheen wrote: »
    That's a nonsense argument because RTÉ, who get a large majority of the licence fee as it is, can also apply for Sound and Vision funding.

    i'm afraid that's what happens when you have 1 authority regulating both, equality and fairness comes into play.
    Faugheen wrote: »
    The independent sector also have a broadcasting levy which can cost from 6 to 7 figures depending on the stations income.

    cutting it or abolishing it altogether might be a better idea then giving them any more of the tv licence fee. but maybe that might bring it's own set of problems.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,260 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    Faugheen wrote: »
    That's a nonsense argument because RTÉ, who get a large majority of the licence fee as it is, can also apply for Sound and Vision funding.

    The independent sector also have a broadcasting levy which can cost from 6 to 7 figures depending on the stations income.

    It isn't a nonsense argument. Sound and Vision is there to fund a specific type of programme on radio and television. These programmes have to be made by independent production companies and is only payable after a station has agreed to commission and broadcast it. It is not a form of income for stations and it can not fund day to day spending for a broadcaster.

    RTE are welcome to apply via the scheme but the same criteria of what is and isn't allowed applies to them. Certainly I know that they are refused funding for many programmes that have been applied for.

    On your second point; the broadcasting levy applied is part of how the BAI are funded. If a station is paying out seven figures then they can't be too badly off atall atall atall.

    http://www.bai.ie/en/about-us/levy/#al-block-4


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28 A Teddy bear


    It's now FF policy that some of the TV licence will go to local radio if they are in power after the next election.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭real rocker


    It's now FF policy that some of the TV licence will go to local radio if they are in power after the next election.

    All these stations are commercial operations & were set up as such. If they are so concerned about their finances maybe they could lobby the BAI regarding possible over regulation. If on the other hand their local service is so popular what is the problem?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28 A Teddy bear


    Let's be honest tho, some local stations are way more deserving of tax payers money than 2fm is.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    All these stations are commercial operations & were set up as such. If they are so concerned about their finances maybe they could lobby the BAI regarding possible over regulation. If on the other hand their local service is so popular what is the problem?

    I agree 100%..Independent Commercial broadcasters is what they started up as..Independent,not depending on another for livelihood or subsistence.If they cant make it work,hand back the licence.


  • Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Let's be honest tho, some local stations are way more deserving of tax payers money than 2fm is.
    There are self-titled Nigerian princes who are more deserving of the 4m - 5m euro 2FM absorbs from public coffers every year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,581 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Most stations would be delighted just to have the BAI funded from it and not from a turnover levy


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    The problem is that RTE gets taxpayer money AND ad revenue, which is absolutely nonsense. BBC aren't allowed to earn revenue from advertising because they have taxpayer funds.

    RTE are stripping ad revenue away from the independent broadcasters and don't have to pay a penny towards the funding of the BAI (the broadcasting levy).

    Independent broadcasters are getting rode compared to RTÉ.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,341 ✭✭✭SPDUB


    Faugheen wrote: »
    The problem is that RTE gets taxpayer money AND ad revenue, which is absolutely nonsense.

    Why is it absolute nonsense ? It was determined when RTE was being set up that due to the size of the population that a licence fee alone wouldn't fund it unless it was a multiple of the fee at the time and the same still applies .
    RTE are stripping ad revenue away from the independent broadcasters and don't have to pay a penny towards the funding of the BAI (the broadcasting levy).

    Independent broadcasters are getting rode compared to RT

    Another way of looking at it is they are stripping ad revenue away from RTE just as any competitor in any line of business .

    There's a case to be made that there should just be one broadcasting Authority but the great and good wouldn't like that as it reduces the chance of handy appointments to boards.

    I've no problem with various regulations being reduced for independent stations especially regarding news given there is a lot of lip service being paid to them anyway


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22 Jank1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,260 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    Jank1 wrote: »

    Except it's not a new source of funding. Local and independent radio (And also, TV stations) have always had access to the Sound and Vision funds from the BAI to make documentary programmes for broadcasting.


Advertisement