Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Help understanding JSA means test as applied to my case

  • 20-12-2016 5:27pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,635 CMod ✭✭✭✭


    This week my cohabiting partner moved from JSB to JSA. I was a Qualified Adult on her previous payment.

    She received a letter explaining the means test that was applied to her case today. In the section on 'Means from Civil Partner/Cohabitant's Insurable Employment' it seems that they have vastly overestimated my average weekly income, something which I can demonstrate to them through documentation. The result is that her payment, with me as a QA also, has been vastly reduced.

    I work for two hours per week in a casual role, while in full-time education. I submit claim forms for these hours and am paid in the calendar month following submission of the forms. On 1st December I was paid for eight hours of work, carried out over a five-week period beginning at the end of September and ending at the end of October. My next claim form is currently being processed - in this case I expect to be paid again on 1st February as I missed the cutoff for January payment.

    In the means test, which applies from 1st December (the same day I was paid), the deciding officer took the figure that I was paid for the work I carried out over that period of five weeks as my average weekly income. This amounted to a little over €300. In reality, over these five weeks, my average weekly income was approximately €60.

    Is there a reason they have taken the figure of €300+ as my average weekly income? The result is that our combined weekly means have been overestimated by about €150.

    In the letter it says that this amount has been divided by 1 in order to calculate it. However, this is not at all representative of what I actually earn as on 1st December I was paid for those five weeks of work between end of September and end of October. I have not been paid since, nor will I be until my next casual claim is processed, in which case the amount with be 6/8 of the previous total as I only worked for 6 hours in that period.

    So, to put it basically, is this the correct process for calculating a person's means? As it stands, it seems that they believe that I am earning a yearly salary of €16,400, when in actual fact, this job is only going to pay me €1,000 in total before I finish at the end of March!


Comments

  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 6,854 Mod ✭✭✭✭mp22


    Step one appeal.
    Perhaps the officer took your monthly pay slip as a weekly one.

    http://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/social_welfare/irish_social_welfare_system/social_welfare_appeals.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,635 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ravelleman


    I suspect so also, though wondered if there was some kind of precedent for this of which I was unaware.

    My partner and I have found the whole experience utterly opaque.

    As a first port of call, I believe that we can appeal in the local Intreo office. I will bring a(nother) letter outlining the circumstances of my employment, making the nature of the payslip absolutely clear, in addition to a letter highlighting the mistake. I hope that this will be sufficient.


Advertisement