Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Third party only insurance

  • 29-09-2016 9:57pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,313 ✭✭✭✭


    I recently got insurance for a 16 year old and requested third party only from a broker but they said you can't get third party only, is this true?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,705 ✭✭✭✭Tigger


    Sam Kade wrote: »
    I recently got insurance for a 16 year old and requested third party only from a broker but they said you can't get third party only, is this true?

    16 year old car ? Yeah they had a meeting and decided we can do that
    16 year old person -can't drive


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    Try Acorn insurance.
    Their unique selling point is charging you twice as much for "TP only" as for fully comp!

    I can't say whether you need to speak backwards to them on the phone or write the cheque in mirror writing or anything but let us know how you get on!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,313 ✭✭✭✭Sam Kade


    Tigger wrote: »
    16 year old car ? Yeah they had a meeting and decided we can do that
    16 year old person -can't drive

    16 old car


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    Sam Kade wrote: »
    16 old car
    Okay, some genuine advice*
    I was assured in another thread that first Ireland will insure older (15+) daily drive cars as classics. Without you needing another policy. Marvellous if true. The person who said this was quite adamant.


    *as long as it isn't one of those filthy treacherous baby eating Japanese cars. Somebody in their office knew someone who had a bad experience with an Asian person once. Or something like that at least.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,846 ✭✭✭✭Liam McPoyle


    Sam Kade wrote: »
    I recently got insurance for a 16 year old and requested third party only from a broker but they said you can't get third party only, is this true?

    Some insurers wont offer TPO for new business.

    From an underwriting point of view its about mitigating potential risks.

    Someone rings for a quote for TPO and driving an old car.

    The fact is that no matter if the policy is bought fraudulently or not an insurance company will always be on the hook for third party claims.

    So someone rings for a new quote looking for the cheapest possible premium on a junker.

    Looks a bit suspect, don't you think?

    Of course there are genuine cases where people aren't bothered about own damage but why take the risk?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,042 ✭✭✭zl1whqvjs75cdy


    Some insurers wont offer TPO for new business.

    From an underwriting point of view its about mitigating potential risks.

    Someone rings for a quote for TPO and driving an old car.

    The fact is that no matter if the policy is bought fraudulently or not an insurance company will always be on the hook for third party claims.

    So someone rings for a new quote looking for the cheapest possible premium on a junker.

    Looks a bit suspect, don't you think?

    Of course there are genuine cases where people aren't bothered about own damage but why take the risk?

    On the other hand why would anyone bother insuring a 16 year old car fully comp? If there is so much as a minor tip in it you know we'll the insurance company will look to write it off for a fraction of the amount paid for it. Why would a customer want fully comp in that case.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,060 ✭✭✭Sue Pa Key Pa


    Comp cover usually includes breakdown assistance and windscreen cover. Also, if you have a smack in your car, 3rd party only insurance won't cover the cost of the recovery truck to take it off the road


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,846 ✭✭✭✭Liam McPoyle


    On the other hand why would anyone bother insuring a 16 year old car fully comp? If there is so much as a minor tip in it you know we'll the insurance company will look to write it off for a fraction of the amount paid for it. Why would a customer want fully comp in that case.

    Sure I know, unless it's a cherished car type with substantial value then comp on a 16 year old vehicle is pretty pointless.

    TPFT is the minimum insurers should offer though, IMO.

    If someone is looking for TPO, for me, with an underwriting hat on, they are looking to spend the minimum, won't give two shiny shytes about the car itself and by extension are less likely to be as cautious on the roads, while parking up etc making them a higher risk. The fact is they don't care about replacing their own car so are less likely (IMO) to care about other peoples cars.

    There is also the fact that if someone is going to stage an accident then they will try and spend the minimum to get on the road. TPO on a junker is spending the minimum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,313 ✭✭✭✭Sam Kade


    Sure I know, unless it's a cherished car type with substantial value then comp on a 16 year old vehicle is pretty pointless.

    TPFT is the minimum insurers should offer though, IMO.

    If someone is looking for TPO, for me, with an underwriting hat on, they are looking to spend the minimum, won't give two shiny shytes about the car itself and by extension are less likely to be as cautious on the roads, while parking up etc making them a higher risk. The fact is they don't care about replacing their own car so are less likely (IMO) to care about other peoples cars.

    There is also the fact that if someone is going to stage an accident then they will try and spend the minimum to get on the road. TPO on a junker is spending the minimum.
    Some speculating there, the reason I would want third party only is as you say to keep the premium down but also if a car worth €1k-1.5k goes on fire or is stolen I am not going to claim off my insurance to replace it only for the premium to shoot up next year. I don't know how you come to the conclusion that people with third party only are careless drivers. If anything people with TPO would be extra careful drivers because they know they'll have to cover the replacement cost themselves.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,060 ✭✭✭Sue Pa Key Pa


    Sam Kade wrote: »
    I don't know how you come to the conclusion that people with third party only are careless drivers.

    That's not what was said. Apart from the cheapest way to stage an accident, the driver looking for the cheapest way to get on the road has been profiled as a problem risk.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 797 ✭✭✭cplwhisper


    Mentioned above is "'comp cover normally includes breakdown "

    Breakdown is actually an additional benefit added to comprehensive cover, it's sold separately but some companies word it as if part of the cover and customers dont read the Terms of Business to clarify same.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,298 ✭✭✭laoisfan


    Try AXA. I got TPFT on a 1998 Nissan Micra 1 Litre back in March.


Advertisement