Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Suitable sports bike for newbie

  • 18-09-2016 11:03am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭


    Hi folks
    I'm about to start my ibt and hopefully get my first bike in the coming months. I'm more into the sporty bike look than anything else. Has anyone got any suggestions regarding suitable bikes (sports) for complete newbie..??? Also insurance friendly would be useful!!!;-) thanks


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,216 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Any reason sporty? My advice would be to check out a few first.

    There is some lovely naked setups on the market recently MT range specifically


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭daludo


    Just prefer the look really, is there a different type you'd recommend???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,135 ✭✭✭✭GBX


    Kawasaki Ninja 300 perhaps?


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,765 ✭✭✭Pugzilla


    Ninja 300 isn't a real sportbike. It's a naked bike with a full fairing slapped on to it. None of the real sportbikes are suitable for beginners.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,135 ✭✭✭✭GBX


    Pugzilla wrote: »
    Ninja 300 isn't a real sportbike. It's a naked bike with a full fairing slapped on to it. None of the real sportbikes are suitable for beginners.

    Why because it's not a 600/1000?

    It's a small cc sport bike. Suited to those who want a sports bike at the start.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 1,765 ✭✭✭Pugzilla


    GBX wrote: »
    Why because it's not a 600/1000?

    It's a small cc sport bike. Suited to those who want a sports bike at the start.

    It has a fairly upright riding position and its rake angle isn't that steep.
    Would you call a gsx650f a sportbike because it has a full fairing?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,878 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    My suggestion for a sports bike for a noobie would be a Suzuki SV650s.

    Lots of poke, not enough to tie you (a beginner) up in knots. Brilliant handling & riding position (even for plus 6 ft riders) and good fuel economy.

    I love the clocks, the riding position and the engine on the old curvy SV650.. The newer pointy SV650 has a more refined engine, but IMO not as much fun however you might find less maintenance on the pointy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,596 ✭✭✭hairyslug


    Cbr500r, not to many selling over here but they are fairly cheap over in the UK


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭DMW22


    Have to agree with Makikomi. I started out on a SV650s last year and loved it. Plenty of power and torque to learn with. Also lots of engine braking which is nice too.
    It's a lovely handling bike and really enjoyed getting it onto some twisty roads. I will never forget the first trip I did to Kerry on it. That was the first taste of some proper twisty roads. Motorbike heaven!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,081 ✭✭✭BKtje


    I learnt on the ninja 300 and i'd definitely class it towards a small cc sports bike. It handles like one, the engine feels like one and the sitting position while not fully sports bike has a lot more in common with a sportsbike than not. It's no slouch either for its displacement.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,430 ✭✭✭bladespin


    GBX wrote: »
    Why because it's not a 600/1000?

    It's a small cc sport bike. Suited to those who want a sports bike at the start.

    Agree, a CBR250/400, ZXR 400, GSXR400 etc are 'sports' bikes, just because a bike wears a full fairing does not make it a sports bike, it's all about power, handling and delivery.

    MasteryDarts Ireland - Master your game!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,552 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    OP should check with insurers first, depending on age anything remotely sporty with 0 NCB can be impossible to insure.

    In Cavan there was a great fire / Judge McCarthy was sent to inquire / It would be a shame / If the nuns were to blame / So it had to be caused by a wire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭rat_race


    Pugzilla wrote: »
    Ninja 300 isn't a real sportbike. It's a naked bike with a full fairing slapped on to it. None of the real sportbikes are suitable for beginners.
    Pugzilla wrote: »
    It has a fairly upright riding position and its rake angle isn't that steep.
    Would you call a gsx650f a sportbike because it has a full fairing?
    bladespin wrote: »
    Agree, a CBR250/400, ZXR 400, GSXR400 etc are 'sports' bikes, just because a bike wears a full fairing does not make it a sports bike, it's all about power, handling and delivery.

    He said very clearly, twice, that, he prefers the *look* of sportsbikes; who cares on the definition of a "real" sports bike!!

    OP: I started out on a Ninja 250, and I have to say, I loved it, and I never got rid of it. Definitely learned a heck of a lot more on it, than I would have if I'd started on a bigger/faster bike. Plenty of poke, easy to run and maintain.

    Super reliable too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,878 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    rat_race wrote: »
    OP: I started out on a Ninja 250, and I have to say, I loved it, and I never got rid of it. Definitely learned a heck of a lot more on it, than I would have if I'd started on a bigger/faster bike. Plenty of poke, easy to run and maintain.

    Super reliable too.

    On that, I often tell beginners that you'll learn more on a slower bike at the start than a bigger faster bike.

    My first 'proper' sports bike was (you'll all laugh) was a Yamaha RD120YPVS & I thought I was the dogs bollox on it, I even fitted the first real 'sticky track day tires ~ Metzler ME22 'track formula' to it :D

    It was also the first bike I owned which could hit the 100mph mark, if you were tucked down behind the little screen, with a tailwind and coming down a hill but fook man it never stopped me trying :p

    I remember thinking that dumping the clutch from a stop/start and the front wheel jumping into the air (while both feet were still on the ground) was a wheelie lol.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,430 ✭✭✭bladespin


    Anyone who rides one, no impersonators pleazzzze




    RD was the first road bike I owned, micron, k&n, reeds etc, loved it to bits - literally, mate had an Aprillia and used to loose it when the yammy flew past.

    MasteryDarts Ireland - Master your game!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭daludo


    Thanks for all the replies and various opinions. Just to let ye know an insurance company mentioned the following bikes amongst others as good starter bikes for insurance
    Kawasaki er6f
    Kawasaki er6n
    Honda cb 500
    Suzuki gsf 600
    Suzuki sv 650
    Yamaha xvs
    Yamaha xv
    Any opinions on these???
    Thanks again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,135 ✭✭✭✭GBX


    daludo wrote: »
    Thanks for all the replies and various opinions. Just to let ye know an insurance company mentioned the following bikes amongst others as good starter bikes for insurance
    Kawasaki er6f
    Kawasaki er6n
    Honda cb 500
    Suzuki gsf 600
    Suzuki sv 650
    Yamaha xvs
    Yamaha xv
    Any opinions on these???
    Thanks again
    Some of them bikes would depend on which licence you have .. A1/2.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭daludo


    Just looking for something to get going on myself after a few lessons and ibt.as I said I'm a total newb, green as the grass :-S


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭daludo


    Just looking for something to get going on myself after a few lessons and ibt.as I said I'm a total newb, green as the grass :-S


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,878 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    daludo wrote: »
    Just looking for something to get going on myself after a few lessons and ibt.as I said I'm a total newb, green as the grass :-S

    Another idea is to find out which of those bikes your IBT instructor uses for the students and see how that feels for you?.

    What kind of riding are you doing, ie city commutes to work, motorway riding etc?.

    Some sports bikes, even the little one's like the SV can be a handful in city traffic when you're trying to filter whilst bikes like the CB500 is a brilliant commuter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭corkgsxr


    Another idea is to find out which of those bikes your IBT instructor uses for the students and see how that feels for you?.

    What kind of riding are you doing, ie city commutes to work, motorway riding etc?.

    Some sports bikes, even the little one's like the SV can be a handful in city traffic when you're trying to filter whilst bikes like the CB500 is a brilliant commuter.

    I'd go for the sv 650 or the er6. Both great bikes.

    A sv would not be awkward in traffic. Abit of forward planning and any proper sports bike isn't either.

    And a ninja 300 is a decent bike but nowhere near a sports bike.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 2,957 Mod ✭✭✭✭macplaxton


    SV650, well the old (non-S) ones at least, are very handy through traffic.

    4615647874_41794e351a_z.jpg
    DSCF0001 by macplaxton, on Flickr

    Ideal despatch tool, with Scotoiler + Keith Gold Size 5 topbox bolted onto a spare pillion seat (for quick removal for the weekends).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭daludo


    daludo wrote: »
    Just looking for something to get going on myself after a few lessons and ibt.as I said I'm a total newb, green as the grass :-S

    Another idea is to find out which of those bikes your IBT instructor uses for the students and see how that feels for you?.

    What kind of riding are you doing, ie city commutes to work, motorway riding etc?.

    Some sports bikes, even the little one's like the SV can be a handful in city traffic when you're trying to filter whilst bikes like the CB500 is a brilliant commuter.
    Mostly country roads. Sunday spins


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,878 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    daludo wrote: »
    Mostly country roads. Sunday spins

    The SV650s so, cheap as chips and bags of fun.

    The 'S' has a fairing and clip-on bars. They're really fun and sound fantastic with an aftermarket slip on pipe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭daludo


    Thanks Makikomi il check out that bike,seems to tick a lot of boxes on this forum...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,430 ✭✭✭bladespin


    daludo wrote:
    Mostly country roads. Sunday spins


    SV would be made for this, pokey v twin.

    MasteryDarts Ireland - Master your game!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,202 ✭✭✭amacca


    On that, I often tell beginners that you'll learn more on a slower bike at the start than a bigger faster bike.

    I'm probably demonstrating ignorance here but what do the smaller bikes allow you to learn that a big bike wouldnt?

    limits of grip, how to muscle it around corners...just overall better control?

    I've only ever been on big bikes (1000cc - tho my second was a 750) and while I feel proficient and haven't had a proper accident yet (bar letting one tip over on me in the car park and losing front wheel at crawling pace in a driveway with deep gravel) I can't help feeling people who got used to flinging smaller machines around are better than me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,878 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    amacca wrote: »
    I'm probably demonstrating ignorance here but what do the smaller bikes allow you to learn that a big bike wouldnt?

    limits of grip, how to muscle it around corners...just overall better control?

    I've only ever been on big bikes (1000cc - tho my second was a 750) and while I feel proficient and haven't had a proper accident yet (bar letting one tip over on me in the car park and losing front wheel at crawling pace in a driveway with deep gravel) I can't help feeling people who got used to flinging smaller machines around are better than me.

    I'm drunk.. I'll get back to you tomorrow if I can :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,202 ✭✭✭amacca


    I'm drunk.. I'll get back to you tomorrow if I can :P

    Fair enough.....I should really be drinking myself :pac::pac::pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 1,765 ✭✭✭Pugzilla


    It's Easier to build confidence and skills on a bike that you know isn't going to rip your head off if you make a mistake.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,907 ✭✭✭✭CJhaughey


    I like many older bikers on small machines, 50cc-80cc-175cc-250cc-650cc.
    Offroad and then onroad once I was able to ride legally.
    On small machines you can learn manoeuvres that transfer to larger heavier machines without fear of dropping a heavy machine.
    Once a top heavy bike starts to go its difficult to keep it upright, a small light machine can be stabilised easily and build your confidence that way.
    Riding offroad is probably the best for bike control, learning to control a bike in slippery, wet, off camber corners is a good example.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,223 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    Aren't modern bigger bikes close to the same weight as old small bikes? My naked 700 is 186kg full. What did old 250s weigh?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,430 ✭✭✭bladespin


    Lumen wrote: »
    Aren't modern bigger bikes close to the same weight as old small bikes? My naked 700 is 186kg full. What did old 250s weigh?

    The old CBR250 was a claimed 143kg dry, 158 full.

    MasteryDarts Ireland - Master your game!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,907 ✭✭✭✭CJhaughey


    bladespin wrote: »
    The old CBR250 was a claimed 143kg dry, 158 full.

    X7 was 160kg wet, XL250S 132kg wet, IT 175 93kg dry, CR250R 93kg dry
    RZ50 75kg MT5 83kg, TS100 92kg PE400 ~110kg NX650 180kg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,430 ✭✭✭bladespin


    CJhaughey wrote: »
    RZ50 75kg

    :eek:

    MasteryDarts Ireland - Master your game!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,907 ✭✭✭✭CJhaughey


    bladespin wrote: »
    :eek:

    That was a really fun bike, superlight and fun to ride.
    397748.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,903 ✭✭✭frozenfrozen


    394564.jpg
    394565.jpg


    cheap, cheap to insure, light (190kg wet)

    I don't know about what other bikes are like to learn on but I have no complaints about the sv


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,430 ✭✭✭bladespin


    CJhaughey wrote: »
    That was a really fun bike, superlight and fun to ride.

    Had an RD125LC, it's bigger (lol) brother, one of the best bikes ever regardless of size.190384_1956699001807_7227290_n.jpg?oh=542ec70fed468e5a0cdc9a4743f28b56&oe=58820144

    MasteryDarts Ireland - Master your game!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,907 ✭✭✭✭CJhaughey


    bladespin wrote: »
    Had an RD125LC, it's bigger (lol) brother, one of the best bikes ever regardless of size.190384_1956699001807_7227290_n.jpg?oh=542ec70fed468e5a0cdc9a4743f28b56&oe=58820144

    I'll say this for Yamaha, They build a good two stroke engine and they know how to make a nice handling bike.
    Combine the two and the result is brilliant fun.
    I'd imagine the 125 wasn't a whole pile heavier than the 50cc with a lot more power.


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,765 ✭✭✭Pugzilla




    This videos is a good example of how a small bike helps skill progression. The guy on the 250 is able to dominate 1000cc sportbikes in the corners.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,878 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    Speaking of the RD125 ypvs.. Sometime in the mid/late 80's I rode down from Belfast with my pillion GF holding onto an Argos slide, and we'd three crates of cider bungee strapped to the tank.

    Because of the border restrictions and customs we rode up towards Forkhill via some un-approved roads to by pass the Brit army/RUC check point at Newry and the customs check on the Irish side.

    I'd some mad times on that bike :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,552 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Pugzilla wrote: »
    Ninja 300 isn't a real sportbike. It's a naked bike with a full fairing slapped on to it. None of the real sportbikes are suitable for beginners.

    I was going to say 'you're wrong, watch Pugzilla's video down the page' but then you'd be arguing with yourself :p

    If (with a good rider on board) it out-corners litre sportsbikes then it's a sportsbike.

    In Cavan there was a great fire / Judge McCarthy was sent to inquire / It would be a shame / If the nuns were to blame / So it had to be caused by a wire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭rat_race


    amacca wrote: »
    I'm probably demonstrating ignorance here but what do the smaller bikes allow you to learn that a big bike wouldnt?

    limits of grip, how to muscle it around corners...just overall better control?

    I've only ever been on big bikes (1000cc - tho my second was a 750) and while I feel proficient and haven't had a proper accident yet (bar letting one tip over on me in the car park and losing front wheel at crawling pace in a driveway with deep gravel) I can't help feeling people who got used to flinging smaller machines around are better than me.

    It's about a few things, really...

    Here's how I'd summarize it:
    • Lighter, less intimidating to move around
    • Less scary & easier to get the knee down (shouldn't be any easier, but we instinctively think heavier things are more likely to fall over)
    • Easier to filter (narrower than bigger bikes, and smaller wheelbase)
    • Gives more cornering confidence (i.e., carrying speed into and out of your turns), a bigger bike would mean a lot more skill would be required to achieve the same
    • Easier to brake and more importantly, emergency brake
    • More forgiving WHEN you make mistakes (less power), with the throttle, braking, or gearing
    • Cheaper to buy, maintain, and fix
    • Good way to figure out what you want and don't want in a bike, before paying big money
    • Easier to experiment/practice on (emergency braking, throttle control), without killing yourself
    • If a smaller/cheaper first, you're more likely to learn how to tinker with it, maintain it -- it's simpler and handier to work on that a lot of larger bikes


Advertisement