Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

A sort of chemistry question

Options
  • 17-08-2016 12:20pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 865 ✭✭✭


    Not ground breaking science but just something I'm wondering about.

    I have a vegetable garden and a huge amount of weeds on our driveway, patio and elsewhere. I don't want to use chemical weed killers and so use a combination of vinegar, salt and washing up liquid (5 litres vinegar, 1 cup salt and squirt washing up liquid). I used it and its works great. I used it out on the patio between the paving stones, they are large grey stones. Obviously when I sprayed you can see it is wet and then it dries in leaving a small mark which goes. However, this week it was very hot when I sprayed, it dried quickly but late in the evening when it got cool the "wet" marks reappeared and had spread. they where still there in the morning and once again disappeared during the day but came back in the cold evening again.

    So, I'm just curious as to the scientific reason for this....any ideas?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    tringle wrote: »
    ... I don't want to use chemical weed killers ...


    ...use a combination of vinegar, salt and washing up liquid (5 litres vinegar, 1 cup salt and squirt washing up liquid)...


    Just what do you think "vinegar", "salt" and "washing up liquid" are, if they're not "chemical"?


    EVERYTHING is "chemical". EV. ER. Y. THING. No exceptions.



    For the record, the items you named are, in order:

    Acetic Acid
    Sodium Chloride
    A mixture of many chemicals, but predominantly Dihydrogen Monoxide with some detergents in it too, such as Sodium Lauryl Sulphate.


    Did you know the following about Dihydrogen Monoxide?

    Dihydrogen monoxide:
    is also known as hydroxyl acid, and is the major component of acid rain.
    contributes to the "greenhouse effect".
    may cause severe burns.
    contributes to the erosion of our natural landscape.
    accelerates corrosion and rusting of many metals.
    may cause electrical failures and decreased effectiveness of automobile brakes.
    has been found in excised tumors of terminal cancer patients.

    Despite the danger, dihydrogen monoxide is often used:
    as an industrial solvent and coolant.
    in nuclear power plants.
    in the production of styrofoam.
    as a fire retardant.
    in many forms of cruel animal research.
    in the distribution of pesticides. Even after washing, produce remains contaminated by this chemical.
    as an additive in certain "junk-foods" and other food products.


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,247 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    ^^
    :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,247 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    EVERYTHING is "chemical". EV. ER. Y. THING. No exceptions.
    Oh yeah? What about a shadow?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    A shadow isn't a thing!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,247 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    A shadow isn't a thing!!

    Pfffftt....

    I'm looking at one now.

    :rolleyes:

    :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 865 ✭✭✭tringle


    Did you know the following about Dihydrogen Monoxide?

    Dihydrogen monoxide:
    is also known as hydroxyl acid, and is the major component of acid rain.
    contributes to the "greenhouse effect".
    may cause severe burns.
    contributes to the erosion of our natural landscape.
    accelerates corrosion and rusting of many metals.
    may cause electrical failures and decreased effectiveness of automobile brakes.
    has been found in excised tumors of terminal cancer patients.

    Despite the danger, dihydrogen monoxide is often used:
    as an industrial solvent and coolant.
    in nuclear power plants.
    in the production of styrofoam.
    as a fire retardant.
    in many forms of cruel animal research.
    in the distribution of pesticides. Even after washing, produce remains contaminated by this chemical.
    as an additive in certain "junk-foods" and other food products.

    I wasn't asking for a lecture, I used a "squirt" of washing up liquid. The ingredients I used are perfectly safe to put on my chips or wash my dishes with so wont cause planet meltdown this week. However if you want to visit I'm happy to make you Monsanto Roundup soup...after all its still only a chemical.
    I withdraw my question and will slink away back to forums more suitable for those of us less brainy.

    Though I notice despite all the info you felt the need to offer, my question wasn't answered.


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,247 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    tringle wrote: »
    I wasn't asking for a lecture, I used a "squirt" of washing up liquid. The ingredients I used are perfectly safe to put on my chips or wash my dishes with so wont cause planet meltdown this week.

    http://www.theecologist.org/green_green_living/behind_the_label/268721/behind_the_label_fairy_liquid.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 865 ✭✭✭tringle


    and Ecover is the one I use.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,090 ✭✭✭KAGY


    tringle wrote:
    I don't want to use chemical weed killers and so use a combination of vinegar, salt and washing up liquid .... So, I'm just curious as to the scientific reason for this....any ideas?
    No pedantic point scoring here :-)
    my *guess* is the solution has dried into a very thin layer which is hygroscopic, when it gets cool at night and the water vapour in the air condenses and re-wets it.
    When something is wet the surface is smoother and you don't get as much light scattering in all directions making the colour more saturated.


  • Registered Users Posts: 405 ✭✭bduffy


    KAGY wrote: »
    No pedantic point scoring here :-)
    my *guess* is the solution has dried into a very thin layer which is hygroscopic, when it gets cool at night and the water vapour in the air condenses and re-wets it.
    When something is wet the surface is smoother and you don't get as much light scattering in all directions making the colour more saturated.
    Just to add to this, I think the question the op asked was what kind of chemistry is going on. I think that the chemistry is over as the acid has reacted with a mineral (tile), leaving a porous surface which can soak up water and then dry out.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 865 ✭✭✭tringle


    Thanks...that's the sort of things I was thinking. That the liquid evaporated quickly but the chemicals attracted water back in the cooler evening and held it....something like that. I was surprised it happened a second night as well, but it was two very hot days.
    I'm always fascinated by "kitchen science".


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    tringle wrote: »
    I wasn't asking for a lecture, I used a "squirt" of washing up liquid. The ingredients I used are perfectly safe to put on my chips or wash my dishes with so wont cause planet meltdown this week. However if you want to visit I'm happy to make you Monsanto Roundup soup...after all its still only a chemical.
    I withdraw my question and will slink away back to forums more suitable for those of us less brainy.

    Though I notice despite all the info you felt the need to offer, my question wasn't answered.


    That whooshing sound over your head is your complete failure either to read or to understand what I wrote, or recognise that it was tongue in cheek.

    In case it was failure to understand: Dihydrogen Monoxide is better known as 'water'!


  • Registered Users Posts: 405 ✭✭bduffy


    endacl wrote: »

    I just read this and saw numerous spelling mistakes in the chemical names and then came across this "For a detergent to be considered biodegradable by the EU, it need only break down by 660 per cent within 28 days".

    I'm not sure how something can break down by over 600 percent....I can understand increasing by 600% but not decreasing....it would appear that the author copied a lot of information (with no references) and makes blanket statements.

    Anyhow, back to the day job.....


Advertisement