Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How High

  • 10-08-2016 4:16pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭


    Just a quick question, how high could a passenger jet fly something like a 737 or a A320. What would happen if they went higher that the guidelines?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    airliners are always under positive ATC control and have to stay at assigned heights; a 737 or an A320 could get to the likes of 41,000 feet but routinely operate at lower levels in the mid-30s for fuel efficiency.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭pm.


    What would happen if they went higher than that? Just out of curiosity


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,012 ✭✭✭Pat Dunne


    pm. wrote: »
    What would happen if they went higher than that? Just out of curiosity

    It might get stuck up there and not be able to come down again. :D


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,855 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    pm. wrote: »
    What would happen if they went higher than that? Just out of curiosity

    Simply it can't.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceiling_(aeronautics)


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,522 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    It ends up in what's known as coffin corner, where the stall speed and the achievable air speed coincide, (due to the air becoming thinner at high altitudes) at which point, life for the crew becomes "interesting", in that you can get overspeed AND stall warnings at the same time, and avoiding damage to the airframe requires some very delicate handling. If the control inputs are too aggressive, significant airframe damage can occur.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭pm.



    Thanks that explains it..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,499 ✭✭✭✭Alun


    Isn't there one of these new experimental space planes that's launched from atop an adapted commercial airliner? I'm guessing that flies as high as is practically possible to gain as much advantage as possible?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭veetwin


    I recall being on an almost empty chartered 767 when the captain got on the PA to announce the we were cruising at FL 43. He was quite chuffed about it at the time!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,729 ✭✭✭martinsvi


    another consideration is the jet engine itself and air conditioning system. If a plane/engine is designed to operate at certain altitude, it relies on certain amount of oxygen being available for efficient combustion and feeding the cabin with air. If you go too high, not only the wings will have no grip, the engines might surge/stall as well and cabin might loose oxygen level

    the experimental space or near space planes (Virgin Galactic, SR-71 etc) typically use some sort of Delta wing or fuselage design which allows them to achieve greater altitudes and speeds. However this design is impractical for passenger jets because at low speeds and altitudes (approach to land for example) it requires high angle of attack to maintain lift and also can be fairly unstable - part of the reason why Concorde typically had to add some 25 - 40kt on take-off and landing speeds comparing to similar sized airliners

    another thing which Virgin Galactic or SR-71 can do but regular planes can't - is to use the afterburner. Typically this causes quite a bit of noise which folks on the ground are not too excited about.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,855 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    I remember at extreme altitude the U2 had a tiny window of speed, and that it was perilously close to stalling.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,297 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    Yeager took an NF-104 on a rocket assisted jaunt to just shy of 120,000ft.....it didn't end well - stalled, flamed out, he couldn't re-start he spun down through over 100,000 ft and finally punched out at about 12,000ft only to get the ejection seat 'ass kicker' rocket motor in his face!!

    The dramatised version.....



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 666 ✭✭✭maximum12


    Two idiots tried it on a ferry flight along with some other joy riding maneuvers that got them killed

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinnacle_Airlines_Flight_3701


Advertisement