Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Inferno

  • 09-05-2016 4:11pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,571 ✭✭✭✭


    Latest Robert Langdon movie from author Dan Brown, starring Tom Hanks and Felicity Jones.

    I don't think the book was particularly memorable (apart from the climax). Should be watchable at least.



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,571 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    Full trailer (judging by the massive reaction to the teaser above, the anticipation is reaching fever pitch!) :p



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,571 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    The trailer gives away most of the plot. When will they ever learn?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,838 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    If you liked the book don't bother with the movie. . Infuriating differences.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 664 ✭✭✭9or10


    Mr E wrote: »
    The trailer gives away most of the plot. When will they ever learn?
    I keep seeing the same clip on line.

    "They've developed a plague"
    "I can find it"
    "Look there's a clue"

    I was writing better stuff than that in English homework 40 years ago. What was Hanks thinking of, does he owe someone a lot of money or what?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,838 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Ipso wrote: »

    Decent if the differences to the book don't annoying you. The other half hadn't read the book and thought the movie was ok. I read the book so freaking hate it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    9or10 wrote: »
    What was Hanks thinking of, does he owe someone a lot of money or what?
    I expect he's contractually tied to it after making the first one.

    Also, someone showed up at his house with a truck full of money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Was fairly meh.

    Hanks was good, as always.. But the supporting cast couldn't do squat with the piss poor dialogue they were given.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,504 ✭✭✭Polo_Mint


    Went to see it on Saturday.

    I found they dragged out the first half of the movie with confusion and the second half made you forget what happened in the first half.

    There was no Flow to it.

    the DaVinci Code and Angels and Demons were much better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    Walked out after an hour.

    I liked the aspect of story with regards to over population and dilemma referenced but the rest of the story was too repetitive and not nearly as engaging.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    The premise and moral dilemma of the story is a very intriguing it's just a petty such a hack as Brown wrote a by the number chase story using it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,571 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    I think "Dan Brown" is a millstone around its neck. Would people have been so harsh if it wasn't Dan Brown?

    Saw it tonight and quite liked it. It's not as bad as the critics are making out.

    Having said that, they changed the ending to the book, where if I remember correctly
    the virus was released a few days earlier, sterilising half of the population instead of killing it, and Sienna wasn't really bad in the end
    . That would have been far more interesting than the "Hollywood" ending that we got.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    I've read the book, I now see "hollywood ending" so I'm out.

    I actually found the book to be decent and the ending was refreshing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Virtanen


    Mr E wrote: »
    Having said that, they changed the ending to the book, where if I remember correctly
    the virus was released a few days earlier, sterilising half of the population instead of killing it, and Sienna wasn't really bad in the end
    . That would have been far more interesting than the "Hollywood" ending that we got.
    Disappointing, but not surprising. I suspected they'd do as much as soon as I read the book


Advertisement