Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

So who is ducking who??

  • 09-05-2016 10:23am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 748 ✭✭✭


    As the title suggests, I have started this thread to continue discussions about the blatant & shameful carry on of "ducking" in the pro game.

    I'll start the list of avoiders, feel free to add:

    Golovkin - (Canelo, Cotto, BJS, Jacobs, Quillin)
    Kovalev - (Stevenson, Ward, Braehmer)
    Rigondeaux - (Frampton, Quigg, LSC, )


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,358 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    boxer.fan wrote: »
    As the title suggests, I have started this thread to continue discussions about the blatant & shameful carry on of "ducking" in the pro game.

    I'll start the list of avoiders, feel free to add:

    Golovkin - (Canelo, Cotto, BJS, Jacobs, Quillin)
    Kovalev - (Stevenson, Ward, Braehmer)
    Rigondeaux - (Frampton, Quigg, LSC, )

    I say the the parentheses fighters are the duckers!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 689 ✭✭✭Straight Edge Punk


    boxer.fan wrote: »
    As the title suggests, I have started this thread to continue discussions about the blatant & shameful carry on of "ducking" in the pro game.

    I'll start the list of avoiders, feel free to add:

    Golovkin - (Canelo, Cotto, BJS, Jacobs, Quillin)
    Kovalev - (Stevenson, Ward, Braehmer)
    Rigondeaux - (Frampton, Quigg, LSC, )

    Am I understanding this correctly? You think Frampton and Quigg are ducking Rigondeaux???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,358 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Am I understanding this correctly? You think Frampton and Quigg are ducking Rigondeaux???

    He is not thinking that. He is saying that the fighters in parentheses are ducking the fighter to the left of the parentheses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,711 ✭✭✭Joeseph Balls


    walshb wrote: »
    He is not thinking that. He is saying that the fighters in parenthesses are ducking the fighter to the left of the parenthesses.

    Ok I'll say it,
    WTF is a parenthesses?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,358 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Ok I'll say it,
    WTF is a parenthesses?

    A misspelling of parentheses. Brackets!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 231 ✭✭Miccoli


    Every top welterweight (Kell Brook)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,358 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Miccoli wrote: »
    Every top welterweight (Kell Brook)

    Don't be silly. He's defended against Fun time Frankie, Dan the man and some lad named Bizier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 231 ✭✭Miccoli


    walshb wrote: »
    Don't be silly. He's defended against Fun time Frankie, Dan the man and some lad named Bizier.
    I meant he's ducking them all and keeping the belt hostage in Sheffield lol.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 470 ✭✭Joe Musashi


    Nobody seems to want to fight Golovkin at 160 - fully expect Canelo not to fight Golovkin. Would like to see Golovkin at 168 if they cannot secure a big fight at 160 soon.

    Khan clearly has no interest in fighting Brook. He has said as much.

    Kovalev and Ward are apparently going to fight so I would not put either on there.


Advertisement