Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Probability Question?

  • 10-04-2016 12:46pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 855 ✭✭✭


    Okay, this probability question is driving me nuts because I can't understand how the answer in the book makes sense (it's actually a worked example, not a question). Here it is in full:

    HOW MANY DIFFERENT FOUR-DIGIT NUMBERS GREATER THAN 6000 CAN BE FORMED USING THE DIGITS 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 IF I) NO DIGIT CAN BE REPEATED AND II) REPETITIONS ARE ALLOWED

    I got i but ii didn't make sense. I say it's 2 options for the first followed by 7 options followed by 7 options followed by 7 options. So basically 2x7x7x7=686.

    They say it's 2 options followed by 6 options by 6 options by 6 options or 2x6x6x6=432.

    Who's right? If you're allowed repetitions then surely it should be 7x7x7 for the last three digits as you can use any number from 1-7?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,390 ✭✭✭Bowlardo


    2(6 or 7) X 6 (123456) X 5 X 4 is what i think the one with not repetions over 6000 I think

    2X7X7X7 would the over 6000 but allowing repetitions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 430 ✭✭emersyn


    Yeah I would've said 2x7x7x7 too


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 855 ✭✭✭TSMGUY


    Bowlardo wrote: »
    2(6 or 7) X 6 (123456) X 5 X 4 is what i think the one with not repetions over 6000 I think

    2X7X7X7 would the over 6000 but allowing repetitions
    The first part is 2x5x4x3 because you've already counted 6 and 7. I definitely don't see any other answer for part ii.
    emersyn wrote: »
    Yeah I would've said 2x7x7x7 too
    THANK YOU! I swear I think I'm going crazy sometimes with how random these answers in the book are. It's so frustrating because I don't even have a teacher to consult with.

    Thanks for the quick responses guys. If anyone else wants to wade in feel free.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 284 ✭✭skippy1977


    Would agree with Bowlardo for part (i) You have used either 6 or 7 but not both, which leaves you with 6 then 5 then 4.
    2x6x5x4

    Agreed on part (ii) 2x7x7x7


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 855 ✭✭✭TSMGUY


    skippy1977 wrote: »
    Would agree with Bowlardo for part (i) You have used either 6 or 7 but not both, which leaves you with 6 then 5 then 4.
    2x6x5x4

    Agreed on part (ii) 2x7x7x7

    Yeah, looking back on it I'd agree too. It's disgraceful how little effort the authors put into these maths books.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement