Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Is range or boiler more economical?

  • 04-02-2016 9:32pm
    #1
    Jim1000
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 107 ✭✭


    hello Folks,,

    In general,
    Is an oil fired range(60,000btu) more economical than normal oil heating using a boiler(60,000btu)?

    Many Thanks

    ps anyone know what burner the stanley super star came with?


Comments

  • #2
    corkgsxr
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭corkgsxr


    Most likely boiler


  • #3
    Jim1000
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 107 ✭✭Jim1000


    thanks cork,

    the stanley has only one burner and will not be used for cooking, but will be used for heating rads.

    Just wondering whether to get the boiler or stanley. No need for the 2 really.

    cheers


  • #4
    Dtp1979
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,870 ✭✭✭✭Dtp1979


    Jim1000 wrote: »
    thanks cork,

    the stanley has only one burner and will not be used for cooking, but will be used for heating rads.

    Just wondering whether to get the boiler or stanley. No need for the 2 really.

    cheers

    Go with an outdoor condensing boiler


Advertisement