Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

PSNI Constable attempts to arrest presiding judge

  • 16-01-2016 2:19am
    #1
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 9,809 CMod ✭✭✭✭


    A policeman who allegedly approached one of Northern Ireland's most senior judges and threatened to arrest him is to go on trial for contempt of court.

    This is interesting. If a police officer genuinely believes a presiding judge is committing a criminal offence while he's up there doing his judging thing, does he have a right to approach and arrest?

    Full story


Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Shield wrote: »
    A policeman who allegedly approached one of Northern Ireland's most senior judges and threatened to arrest him is to go on trial for contempt of court.

    This is interesting. If a police officer genuinely believes a presiding judge is committing a criminal offence while he's up there doing his judging thing, does he have a right to approach and arrest?

    Full story

    You'll notice the article doesn't specify what crime the good constable alleges took place. If a judge were to snap and start waving a shotgun around then Gardai would of course be entitled to intervene. However if a judge, in deciding a case before them, takes an action or does a thing which any person believes they have no power to do then there is a mechanism to address that.

    If, to take an example along the lines of the above, it transpired that SOMEHOW the order for possession was not legal then the Defendant could appeal it or seek civil redress against the State perhaps. They could not effect an arrest.

    So, basically, if the impugned act forms part of their duties then no arrest could possibly be effected. If the act is prima facie criminal and not in the course of their duties then they are subject to arrest just like anyone else


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,260 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    A quick Google shows us that there is the issue of a mortgage, arrears, a house, a bank and possession proceedings involving the policeman in question. There's a chance that this may or may not be more at home in the Freeman megathread.

    http://www.courtsni.gov.uk/en-GB/Judicial%20Decisions/PublishedByYear/Documents/2013/[2013]%20NICh%2014/j_j_DEE8994Final.htm


Advertisement