Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

DIY Sale Of Site

  • 24-11-2015 2:48pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭


    I'm seeking advice for someone selling a site. (it's about one acre in Ulster (ROI))
    He wants to do as much as possible, of donkey work himself.

    I presume he can place a advert on DAFT and do that end himself.

    How much of the legal work can be done without employing a solicitor?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,798 ✭✭✭Mr. Incognito


    Oh Dear God.

    Well he can do 100% of the work himself.

    Then he can pay ten times what it would have cost to pay a solicitor in the first place to pay another solicitor to fix the balls of it he makes by doing the work himself.

    Never DIY Legals.

    Ever.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭eirman


    Thanks Mr. Incognito, but that wasn't really helpful.

    Surely he can do something(s) himself in advance of employing a solicitor, to get a good deal.

    I know you do need a solicitor to check and finalise everything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,853 ✭✭✭brian_t


    If you ask your solicitor what parts can you do yourself - are they likely to facilitate you ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    In fairness, I'd imagine there is more time, effort and costs for a solicitor in a property transaction to review "legals" done by a non-lawyer than there would be in just doing the work in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,554 ✭✭✭Pat Mustard


    eirman wrote: »
    How much of the legal work can be done without employing a solicitor?

    If the purchaser is handing over a substantial amount of purchase money, he is likely to retain a solicitor to raise queries, look for certain replies/documentation and otherwise protect the interests of the purchaser.

    Realistically, a non-solicitor will not be able to deal with these matters. Therefore, the non-solicitor will not be able to carry out the relevant legal work and the solicitor for the purchaser would refuse to engage with him because of the risks involved. Therefore, it is not likely that the transaction could proceed until the vendor retains his own solicitor.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,798 ✭✭✭Mr. Incognito


    eirman wrote: »
    Thanks Mr. Incognito, but that wasn't really helpful.

    Surely he can do something(s) himself in advance of employing a solicitor, to get a good deal.

    I know you do need a solicitor to check and finalise everything.

    No he can't.

    Conveyancing Solicitors are experts and trained to look out for

    - Defects on Title
    - Negotiating issues on title
    - Boundary issues
    -Charges, Easements, Burdens

    They also draft the documents, make sure of the security, get arcitects to provide boundaries, clarify insurance, carry out legal searches, and also ensure that the banking of the transaction is arranged.

    Selling property is full of risk. A solicitor will only deal with a solicitor because he knows that the other person will be in a position to deal with these queries and most issues are sorted out quickly.

    A DIY layperson would not

    1. Understand the issues
    2. Be in a position to deal with them.

    They would also pay much much much more for a solicitors time to "fix" the mistakes which they would have to find, re-do the documents correctly.

    On the off chance there was a huge glaring defect in title the vendor might think fantastic and take the layperson for a ride.

    Why you think that there is a saving to be made in being an idiot is beyond me.

    TLDR; Costs more. Stupid Idea.


  • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,781 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


    I need heart surgery and I'm planning to open my chest cavity myself with a circular saw to save money on expensive surgeons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭NUTLEY BOY


    It is a false economy to think of doing something like this on a DIY basis.

    Ironically, the DIY vendor will actually create more work for the solicitor who is eventually retained to check over what has been done because the solicitor will need to review and satisfy themselves about the veracity of the DIY elements too.

    No solicitor in their sane senses will actually take instructions to just check over what has been done by a DIY putative vendor. See it from the solicitor's perspective. If matters go awry because of the DIY element can the solicitor stand over the work that they - the solicitor - did in handling the transaction ? Probably not and that may lead to a professional negligence case too.

    Also, see it from a purchaser's perspective. Would their solicitor advise the purchaser to close a sale if the title looks defective ? No.

    If there is a concern about value for money, shop around. Proper and sound advice for something like this is really important.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,769 ✭✭✭nuac


    You can get legal precedents for practically everything online nowadays.

    Use of such is often a fertile source of litigation, later. for real lawyers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,254 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    In fairness, I'd imagine there is more time, effort and costs for a solicitor in a property transaction to review "legals" done by a non-lawyer than there would be in just doing the work in the first place.
    This.

    When I was in private practice, if offered the task of reviewing my client's conveyancing I would almost certainly have declined the instructions. If I had accepted, it would have been on the basis that I would charge an hourly rate, not a scale fee, and I am 100% confident that the bill on the hourly rate would end up being much, much higher than if I had done the conveyancing myself, and charged the scale fee.

    It takes much more time and effort to review and correct work done by somebody unqualified and inexperienced that it does just to do the work yourself in the first place.

    This is not a cost-saving strategy for the client. It's a money-wasting strategy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,022 ✭✭✭eirman


    Thanks everyone ..... all advice was taken on board.

    Following some non-boards.ie advice, I am recommending he gets a FIXED price (Not %) from a couple of solicitors
    and to make sure he has his documentation fully together an organised.


Advertisement