Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Planning permission question

  • 30-10-2015 10:41am
    #1
    seanie17berry
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 ✭


    Hi guys,

    Kinda stuck here and need advice.. i have a site to build on a family site where there is also my grannys house, but on her conditions for her planning at the time 19 years ago it says it should not be subdivided or sold for more construction.
    Anyone any ideas if i will get over this ?


Comments

  • #2
    Angry bird
    Closed Accounts Posts: 808 ✭✭✭Angry bird


    Through a planning application is how you deal with this condition, i.e. application for a house on the site. As I said on the other thread, seek a pre-planning meeting with the Council to get their opinion on it before you spend any money.


  • #3
    sydthebeat
    Subscribers Posts: 42,312 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    seanie17berry wrote: »
    Hi guys,

    Kinda stuck here and need advice.. i have a site to build on a family site where there is also my grannys house, but on her conditions for her planning at the time 19 years ago it says it should not be subdivided or sold for more construction.
    Anyone any ideas if i will get over this ?

    what is the 'exact' wording of that condition?

    is it a section 47 agreement condition?
    if so, is there any reference to immediate family members being exempt from this sterilization ?


  • #4
    seanie17berry
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 ✭seanie17berry


    It says condition 9. The site shall not be sub-divided and no part of it shall be sold off separately from the overall site containing 1.4 acres. And the reason is : in the interest of orderly development in the area.

    This was in 1995, and other houses were built in the community since.
    Thank you in advance.


  • #5
    sydthebeat
    Subscribers Posts: 42,312 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    seanie17berry wrote: »
    It says condition 9. The site shall not be sub-divided and no part of it shall be sold off separately from the overall site containing 1.4 acres. And the reason is : in the interest of orderly development in the area.

    This was in 1995, and other houses were built in the community since.
    Thank you in advance.

    ok then, no section 47.

    the only way this can be altered is by a new planning condition, to remove that condition, to reduce existing site boundaries of planning file 95/XXX and for new dwelling etc etc

    definitely worth a pre planning meeting to discuss this before doing any work, as its by no means a simple application


  • #6
    seanie17berry
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 ✭seanie17berry


    Ok, thank you.

    Pre-planning meeting it is so. I wonder did anyone else ever had this problem and got positive news.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Angry bird
    Closed Accounts Posts: 808 ✭✭✭Angry bird


    A sterilisation clause is what it's called and has not been applied for a number of years so I would guess that for a family member they would be prepared to over-rule it.


Advertisement