Just how low can the HSE sink ?.

mountai

Yes I have a vested interest . I have watched my Grand Daughter suffer the most appalling side effects from the HPV Vaccination . Of course we are told that its all coincidental and the Vaccination is safe. If that be the case, then why is it Policy for the HSE to take it upon themselves, to hide the risks from Parents , who have a right to be able to ascertain ALL THE REVELENT DETAILS before making an informed decision re giving their consent. the attached information has been downloaded from OFFICIAL HSE WEBSITE. Opinions please.

LeinsterDub

mountai wrote: »

Yes I have a vested interest . I have watched my Grand Daughter suffer the most appalling side effects from the HPV Vaccination . Of course we are told that its all coincidental and the Vaccination is safe. If that be the case, then why is it Policy for the HSE to take it upon themselves, to hide the risks from Parents , who have a right to be able to ascertain ALL THE REVELENT DETAILS before making an informed decision re giving their consent. the attached information has been downloaded from OFFICIAL HSE WEBSITE. Opinions please.

Side effects seem to be clearly listed and look like the standard side effects for most vacations

desertcircus

mountai wrote: »

Yes I have a vested interest . I have watched my Grand Daughter suffer the most appalling side effects from the HPV Vaccination . Of course we are told that its all coincidental and the Vaccination is safe. If that be the case, then why is it Policy for the HSE to take it upon themselves, to hide the risks from Parents , who have a right to be able to ascertain ALL THE REVELENT DETAILS before making an informed decision re giving their consent. the attached information has been downloaded from OFFICIAL HSE WEBSITE. Opinions please.

How are the HSE hiding any risks from parents? How do you know your granddaughter's illness is the result of the vaccination? What's your definition of safe? Do you think a 99.997% rate of people reporting no serious adverse effects is unreasonable? Do you think there's any actual evidence for the remaining 0.003% who suffered adverse outcomes having had them caused by the vaccine?

MarkAnthony

Becuase any whiff of risk will be blown out of all proportion, people won't vacinate and thousands upon thousands of people will die as a result.

If you want all the details you need a medical degree.

Yes it would've been much better to not give her the vaccine and thus drastically increase her chances of developing cervical cancer in later life.

The Backwards Man

'Severe side effects are extremely rare'

It's there in black and white.

Markcheese

The HSE were following a political decision , if I remember right the government of the day weren't going ahead with the vaccination program (mainly due to cost) - but the political ****storm at the time encouraged them to change their minds-
I would have though that statistically (with 80 of school girls vaccinated and 20 not) it should be relatively easy to show the serious increase in risk to young girls who've had the jabs -

kneemos

mountai wrote: »

Yes I have a vested interest . I have watched my Grand Daughter suffer the most appalling side effects from the HPV Vaccination




What are the side effects?

kylith

You know what has really horrible side effects? Cervical cancer.

mountai

kneemos wrote: »

mountai wrote: »

Yes I have a vested interest . I have watched my Grand Daughter suffer the most appalling side effects from the HPV Vaccination




What are the side effects?

Extreme Pain , Fainting (sometimes 5-6 times a day) Seizures . All of which are NOT LISTED ON THE HSE LIST.

Gatling

Same thread 3 months ago

Yoghurt87

i'm sorry to hear of your grand-daughter's illness. Have her seizures been investigated and confirmed by a neurologist? Has any medical professional she has attended directly linked her symptoms the the HPV vaccine?

mountai

How are the HSE hiding any risks from parents? How do you know your granddaughter's illness is the result of the vaccination? What's your definition of safe? Do you think a 99.997% rate of people reporting no serious adverse effects is unreasonable? Do you think there's any actual evidence for the remaining 0.003% who suffered adverse outcomes having had them caused by the vaccine?
Have you not seen the part where they say "Do not include the PIL in the pack"
Where are getting your figures from.
Why has India and Japan now banned this ?

G_R

As you have been told before, After Hours isn't the forum for this.

Start another thread on it, or anything related to it, and a card will follow.