Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

No more brucellosis testing when selling

  • 24-09-2015 11:01am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭


    Some good news!!

    I hear that they are doing away with the necessity to blood test over 24mth old heifers/cows/bulls from next Monday!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,456 ✭✭✭larrymiller


    Muckit wrote: »
    Some good news!!

    I hear that they are doing away with the necessity to blood test over 24mth old heifers/cows/bulls from next Monday!

    Bulls?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Muckit


    Yes bulls over 24mths old have to be tested if selling through mart. They wouldn't anymore from Monday.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    I just blooded a bull yesterday. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭djmc


    Good news for us but bad news for our vets.
    It will make selling a lot quicker as you can go when you want without having to wait for blood's
    Now if they would only scrap animal rendering charges for fallen animals and bring back reps 4 and a proper hen harrier scheme and up the anc payment I'd be back where I was 10 years ago.☺


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭djmc


    I just blooded a bull yesterday. :(

    Look on the bright side it will be the last time you have to do it hopefully


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,456 ✭✭✭larrymiller


    Muckit wrote: »
    Yes bulls over 24mths old have to be tested if selling through mart. They wouldn't anymore from Monday.

    Never new bulls had to be done. Glad it's finished had a heifer come back positive this year was locked up until the re test came back negative.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,219 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Dont know if its a good or a bad thing, brucellosis is a fecker, we had it here years ago. Will there be any testing at all now for it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭Grueller


    whelan2 wrote: »
    Dont know if its a good or a bad thing, brucellosis is a fecker, we had it here years ago. Will there be any testing at all now for it?

    Its a good thing at a €50 call out charge for the vet to do it. It will show up quickly enough in fallen animal testing if it becomes an issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,219 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Grueller wrote: »
    Its a good thing at a €50 call out charge for the vet to do it. It will show up quickly enough in fallen animal testing if it becomes an issue.
    Yes I agree about saving on the call out fee, just dont want to see the disease back again due to lack of screening


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,219 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Will there still be brucellosis testing on animals that abort and a retest?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,316 ✭✭✭tanko


    whelan2 wrote: »
    Dont know if its a good or a bad thing, brucellosis is a fecker, we had it here years ago. Will there be any testing at all now for it?

    I think they're still going to test for it in meat factories. Am I right in saying milk can be tested for it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,219 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    tanko wrote: »
    I think they're still going to test for it in meat factories. Am I right in saying milk can be tested for it?
    Ye milk is tested for it, that was part of the relaxation in the rules a few years ago that milking cows were being monitored by the dairies


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,559 ✭✭✭visatorro


    Muckit wrote:
    I hear that they are doing away with the necessity to blood test over 24mth old heifers/cows/bulls from next Monday!


    is there still random testing during the annual tb test? I don't think it would be any harm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,633 ✭✭✭✭Buford T. Justice XIX


    whelan2 wrote: »
    Will there still be brucellosis testing on animals that abort and a retest?
    I imagine there will be a broad spectrum of abortion causing bugs being tested for as routine. Milk will still be tested in the ring test and there will be Department funded random testing of suckler/dairy herds each year to maintain to Brucellosis free status.

    We had a blood test a few years ago on sheep for Ovine Brucellosis even though it isn't in the country but a certain number of flocks have to be tested each year.

    Just over 35 years ago, we were depopulated with Brucellosis and my parents had contracted it as well. It took 3 years for my father to get rid of it.

    Glad to see the back of the fekking thing. I doubted we would ever be free from it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Muckit


    visatorro wrote: »
    is there still random testing during the annual tb test? I don't think it would be any harm

    Yes. It's just for selling purposes it's being done away with. As whelan said great to have one less expense and open up the mart outlet but not at the expense of a bruc. Outbreak.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Sacrolyte


    WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,316 ✭✭✭tanko


    Muckit wrote: »
    Yes. It's just for selling purposes it's being done away with. As whelan said great to have one less expense and open up the mart outlet but not at the expense of a bruc. Outbreak.

    So beef herds will still be tested every second year at the herd test as they are now?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,102 ✭✭✭jimini0


    From Monday??/???
    Bloody vet didn't happen to mention that this morning when I wanted two cows blooded. Handy unnecessary 100 for him


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61 ✭✭jayzee


    Can anyone explain why the current low level of milk price was not being factored in to planning by advisors, banks and farmers this time last year when the rush to dairy began in advance of the removal of quota. It wasn't even warned against as a possibility by the farming journos in all their articles pumping the move into milk on a weekly basis. Can anyone tell me if this was predicted anywhere?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,493 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    jayzee wrote: »
    Can anyone explain why the current low level of milk price was not being factored in to planning by advisors, banks and farmers this time last year when the rush to dairy began in advance of the removal of quota. It wasn't even warned against as a possibility by the farming journos in all their articles pumping the move into milk on a weekly basis. Can anyone tell me if this was predicted anywhere?
    Wrong thread ,but what your on about was well flagged and ain't news or unexpected by vast majority of dairy farmers we were told milk prices of 39 cent was unsustainable ,volatility was going to be an issue ,do projections at 28/30 cent average milk price .bit of a wild statement .....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,141 ✭✭✭RightTurnClyde


    jayzee wrote: »
    Can anyone explain why the current low level of milk price was not being factored in to planning by advisors, banks and farmers this time last year when the rush to dairy began in advance of the removal of quota. It wasn't even warned against as a possibility by the farming journos in all their articles pumping the move into milk on a weekly basis. Can anyone tell me if this was predicted anywhere?

    Even we were talking about it last year
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056928708&page=87


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭pbthevet


    jimini0 wrote: »
    From Monday??/???
    Bloody vet didn't happen to mention that this morning when I wanted two cows blooded. Handy unnecessary 100 for him

    They never bothered to tell us. I only found out today


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭pbthevet


    I know money is tight these days but my 2 cents on this relaxing of br testing is that it is too soon. Last confirmed reactor on the island was only in 2012. I still think the disease is out there. I personaly would of waited 10 years till after last one found.

    3 years is nothing. Easy enough for a case to slip tru the net.

    Its only when u think of the speed at which this disease can spread tru a herd, the damage it does and how fast it can spread to other farms that puts it all into perspective. Its also a terrible disease in humans and i know far too many vets and farmers suffering from it.

    There will still be random testing and bulk tank milk surveillance. But i still think we should have waited.

    I included a map of the positives found in 2011 and 2012. They on the border nearly all of them.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 9,041 Mod ✭✭✭✭greysides


    pbthevet wrote: »
    They never bothered to tell us. I only found out today

    Ditto, from a client.

    While it's a pain for the seller, continuing to blood test animals for sale, possibly increasing the duration it lasted, would continue to test those animals most likely to cause the biggest epidemiological problem (i.e. spread it). However, it's all academic now. Let's hope it is truly gone and not stored in a fridge somewhere................

    The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress. Joseph Joubert

    The ultimate purpose of debate is not to produce consensus. It's to promote critical thinking.

    Adam Grant



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,316 ✭✭✭tanko


    Has it been got rid of in Britain?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭BENDYBINN


    Anyone got an official link for this?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 9,041 Mod ✭✭✭✭greysides


    The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress. Joseph Joubert

    The ultimate purpose of debate is not to produce consensus. It's to promote critical thinking.

    Adam Grant



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭Mad4simmental


    greysides wrote: »
    Let's hope it is truly gone and not stored in a fridge somewhere................

    That's the scary thing isn't it. Total carnage in minutes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭High bike


    jayzee wrote: »
    Can anyone explain why the current low level of milk price was not being factored in to planning by advisors, banks and farmers this time last year when the rush to dairy began in advance of the removal of quota. It wasn't even warned against as a possibility by the farming journos in all their articles pumping the move into milk on a weekly basis. Can anyone tell me if this was predicted anywhere?
    supply and demand it was as obvious as the nose on your face that milk prices would drop with the increased production


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 493 ✭✭huey1975


    jimini0 wrote: »
    From Monday??/???
    Bloody vet didn't happen to mention that this morning when I wanted two cows blooded. Handy unnecessary 100 for him

    Now tell the truth, did you really give €100 just to have two bloods taken?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭pbthevet


    That's the scary thing isn't it. Total carnage in minutes.

    They wont be doing anything about diesel washing for a while ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,551 ✭✭✭keep going


    pbthevet wrote: »
    I know money is tight these days but my 2 cents on this relaxing of br testing is that it is too soon. Last confirmed reactor on the island was only in 2012. I still think the disease is out there. I personaly would of waited 10 years till after last one found.

    3 years is nothing. Easy enough for a case to slip tru the net.

    Its only when u think of the speed at which this disease can spread tru a herd, the damage it does and how fast it can spread to other farms that puts it all into perspective. Its also a terrible disease in humans and i know far too many vets and farmers suffering from it.

    There will still be random testing and bulk tank milk surveillance. But i still think we should have waited.

    I included a map of the positives found in 2011 and 2012. They on the border nearly all of them.
    ah there s no such thing as eradicating a disease its controling it and theres different levels of control.there maybe issues from time to time given we are dealng with nature and admitily farmers but if there is a issue the required measure would be taken by the dept to control it.while todays announcement is very welcome the fact that the dept have finaly got it under contol is more important in the greater scheme of things


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,102 ✭✭✭jimini0


    huey1975 wrote: »
    Now tell the truth, did you really give €100 just to have two bloods taken?

    Well have not got the bill yet but I'm guessing it would be around that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,316 ✭✭✭tanko


    jimini0 wrote: »
    Well have not got the bill yet but I'm guessing it would be around that.

    Half that would be more like it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,219 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    jimini0 wrote: »
    Well have not got the bill yet but I'm guessing it would be around that.
    around 50 euro call out fee and about 3 euro each for the testing around here


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭Milked out


    keep going wrote: »
    ah there s no such thing as eradicating a disease its controling it and theres different levels of control.there maybe issues from time to time given we are dealng with nature and admitily farmers but if there is a issue the required measure would be taken by the dept to control it.while todays announcement is very welcome the fact that the dept have finaly got it under contol is more important in the greater scheme of things

    They were dealing with it too, we were cleared out 15 years ago with it. Came up in milk test and bloods showed a solitary reactor. Took the whole herd regardless


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,551 ✭✭✭keep going


    Milked out wrote: »
    They were dealing with it too, we were cleared out 15 years ago with it. Came up in milk test and bloods showed a solitary reactor. Took the whole herd regardless
    o
    ouch bse ourselves but at least its only 6 weeks out with that com9ared to 6 months with brucellosis


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 255 ✭✭mattP


    I think all the excitement is unwarranted as before you know it one of your own will have aborted. And what would you most likely do? Dump the calf and sell on the cow :P Thats how this **** will really spread, one (undocumented) case will keep on spawning more.
    Hate to put a dampner on celebrations :P :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,633 ✭✭✭✭Buford T. Justice XIX


    mattP wrote: »
    I think all the excitement is unwarranted as before you know it one of your own will have aborted. And what would you most likely do? Dump the calf and sell on the cow :P Thats how this **** will really spread, one (undocumented) case will keep on spawning more.
    Hate to put a dampner on celebrations :P :D
    Look, there is currently no brucellosis in the island we live on.

    There is no reservoir of infection that can break out and spread across the country.

    Any animals that abort should be blood tested, as normal, and dealt with as appropriate to the findings.

    All imported animals will be blood tested, as normal, for a range of diseases including brucellosis and any with it will be returned to their home farm/country.

    You may, if you wish, continue blood testing all your animals for sale or purchased but it will do absolutely nothing bar cost you money as there is nothing to find.

    You may as well argue for the continuation of F&M restrictions as that has probably a larger chance of returning than brucellosis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭pbthevet


    Look, there is currently no brucellosis in the island we live on.

    There is no reservoir of infection that can break out and spread across the country.

    Any animals that abort should be blood tested, as normal, and dealt with as appropriate to the findings.

    All imported animals will be blood tested, as normal, for a range of diseases including brucellosis and any with it will be returned to their home farm/country.

    You may, if you wish, continue blood testing all your animals for sale or purchased but it will do absolutely nothing bar cost you money as there is nothing to find.

    You may as well argue for the continuation of F&M restrictions as that has probably a larger chance of returning than brucellosis.

    I hope what you say is right but from what i see in the real world im not so sure. 3 years since last reactor confirmed. Thats not a long time.

    Right on the border where cattle cross completely undocumented daily due to farmers owning land both sides and very few are bothered "doing the proper movement procedure" Theres also a lot of other "gaps" i wont mention but farmers themselves know what goes on.

    I hope its gone, i really do. But i wont be surprised when it returns. Unfortunatly it will have spread a good bit already by then and well be back to square one.

    In the south of the island id say its gone. The north tho im not convinced. and then theres the badlands around the border. God knows the correct status of anything there.

    Waiting a few more years wouldnt of upset people too much, a lot of farmers i talk to even are a little worried.

    We'll see sure. Fingers crossed


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭pbthevet


    mattP wrote: »
    I think all the excitement is unwarranted as before you know it one of your own will have aborted. And what would you most likely do? Dump the calf and sell on the cow :P Thats how this **** will really spread, one (undocumented) case will keep on spawning more.
    Hate to put a dampner on celebrations :P :D

    Yup. And then the next guy will do the same and constant repeat untill someone finaly sends a foetus to the lab probably worried about neo or salmonella and get a big shock.

    then the tears will flow


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 112 ✭✭Wes Palmer Lee


    what about testing for export...? Is the blood testing done away with for that too?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭pbthevet


    what about testing for export...? Is the blood testing done away with for that too?

    No. Thats still there.


Advertisement