9/11: The Missing Evidence on TV3

omnithanos

The program about Monroe was excellent however 9/11: The Missing Evidence mirrors TV3’s germanwings program and the coverage of the Boston Bombing by being manipulative propaganda masquerading as investigative journalism. You can hardly claim this to be a balanced program when it is stated in the program that the outlandish claims of conspiracy theorists using pseudo-science and conjecture are deeply offensive to those directly affected by the disaster and that those people who believe in a conspiracy theory are imbeciles.

Firstly 9/11 is an obvious conspiracy which the official story claims was planned by a man in a cave in Afghanistan with the help of 19 Saudis who left a deliberate trail of evidence to implicate themselves, at least seven of which are confirmed to be still alive and none of these conspirators, including Bin Laden, took credit for the attack. If the named hijackers are still alive then how could the actual terrorists have flown using someone else’s passport and why didn’t the FBI attempt to find the identity of the actual hijackers?

The program champions an untested theory which doesn’t explain how an aluminium explosion could have destroyed the central steel columns. It also falsely claims that only the presence of aluminium can explain the multiple explosions heard prior to the collapse of the towers which directly contradicts an earlier statement in the program that controlled demolition could have brought down the steel structures in the manner we see. Explosive charges planted in the building by the company run by the then President’s brother Marvin Bush who were engaged in upgrades at the towers and who turned off cameras and electricity there the week before 9/11 is a more credible explanation.

The program doesn’t explain how the aluminium wings of a plane can slice through concrete and steel. How did the planes fly at around 500 miles per hour which is well above the structural limit of such aircraft at these altitudes when the maximum speed is accepted to be at best 365 miles per hour?

Interestingly this was the first time in history that a cockpit crew handed over the controls of a plane to a hijacker with a boxcutter, and the second time and the third time and the fourth time. The first time in history that a pilot failed to send a 7500 hijack code, and the second time and the third time and the fourth time. The first time in history that a plane deviated more than 2 degrees off course without being intercepted by Norad within 5 minutes, and the second time and the third time and the fourth time.

It’s also interesting to note that the Federal Aviation Authority, who keep meticulous records, have no record of flight 11 or flight 77 taking off that day. ACARS data shows that flight 175 and flight 93 both landed at Cleveland. The mayor of Cleveland reported that flight 93 landed safely and these two planes weren’t officially deregistered until September 2005. The hole in the ground at Shanksville was reported to be only about 15 to 20 feet by 10 feet and a United States Geogilical survey map of Shanksville shows that this hole in the ground was already there in 1994.

Another anomaly is that the plane engine recovered from Murray Street is exclusively designed for 747’s or 737’s and is not large enough to propel a 767 which is the plane model that allegedly hit both towers.

Electromagnetic pulses were recorded at the time of impact of both alleged planes which would have temporally disabled conventional camera equipment at those times so how then is independent photographic evidence possible?

Sofiztikated

Ok.

KERSPLAT!

Maybe better here http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=576