Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

copyright and ip

  • 08-09-2015 5:44pm
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 161 ✭✭


    What is meant by copyright and intellectual property in terms of not photographing it for a competition? Copyright would be a painting? But IP? Is a work of art on the street someone's IP ?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,989 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Copyright is one form of intellectual property. (A trademark, for example, is another.)

    Is a work of art on the street someone's IP? Probably, yes. It's the intellectual property of the artist who created it in the first instance, but he may have sold or transferred his IP in the work to someone else, so it could now be someone else's IP. It doesn't cease to be intellectual property simply because the work of art is in the street, any more than your car ceases to be your car when you park it in the street, as opposed to your own front drive.

    Can you photograph it without his permission, though? Ah, that's complicated. On the one hand, copyright is (as the name suggests) first and foremost the right to make copies. You generally can't photograph (without permission) a work which is the copyright of someone else. On the other hand, you generally can take photographs in public places, and there's an argument that by displaying his work in the street the IP owner has licensed people to photograph it.

    I think a lot is going to depend on the context. If your photograph is a streetscape in which the work happens to appear because it was in the street at the time, that's one thing. If your photograph is, basically, a photograph of the artwork, that might be another.


Advertisement