Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

AAIB report for BAW762 (engine cowl detachment)

Comments

  • #2
    Locker10a
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,218 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Interesting read I think over all the crew did well


  • #3
    smurfjed
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,433 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    think over all the crew did well
    Why do you say that?

    4 people had the opportunity to stop this from happening and they all missed the fact that the doors were still open.

    The cabin crew evacuation times are excellent, but i wonder what that person had in his trolley that he felt it was too important to leave behind.

    Personally i would have thought that one person flying the aircraft manually with his hand on the throttles would be easier than both flying at the same time.


  • #4
    APM
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 985 ✭✭✭APM


    Locker10a wrote: »
    Interesting read I think over all the crew did well

    Shutting down an engine with no PM confirmation and almost inability to fly the aircraft using manual thrust. Not to mention pretty poor CRM between both regarding the fuel leak and how slow they were to shut down the engine.

    I think if that was a simulator exercise neither pilots would have a license after landing.

    Good learning exercise for us Airbus pilots though.


Advertisement