Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How to deal with nightmare customers?

  • 05-07-2015 11:35am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,634 ✭✭✭


    http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/crosby-grandad-judged-suicide-risk-9589150?ICID=FB-Liv-main

    A MERSEYSIDE great-grandad said his “holiday of a lifetime” was ruined when cruise staff judged him a suicide risk because he said he wanted to “jump ship”.

    The pensioner said he got wet paint on his trousers and hand after arriving in the cabin, because it had been freshly painted, and some of the furniture was stained.

    After complaining several times, he told a maitre d’ in the restaurant that he wanted to “jump ship” at the next stop on the trip last May.

    When he returned to his cabin, security staff and the ship’s second captain arrived and told the family they were seeking legal advice on whether Mr Moran could remain on the ship - as they thought he had threatened to throw himself overboard.



    Anyone else think that the captain made the right decision? Threatening to 'jump ship' can easily be interpreted as a suicide threat, and I wouldn't have taken any chances either. Judging by the comments section, folks are quick to accuse the cruise liner staff of overreacting, but my view is wanting to abandon your holiday over some paint on your trousers is twice as bad!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,022 ✭✭✭jamesbere


    Overreaction on both sides, they should all be shot for this overreaction.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 626 ✭✭✭Massimo Cassagrande


    jamesbere wrote: »
    Overreaction on both sides, they should all be shot for this overreaction.

    I think shooting them would be an overreaction. Throwing them overboard to the sharks would be more mature and measured.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭maxwell smart


    I think shooting them would be an overreaction. Throwing them overboard to the sharks would be more mature and measured.

    And nautically themed, which I am sure all parties would approve of.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,744 ✭✭✭diomed


    Its an idiom. They are idiots. What is the issue? I would be irked. They have odd ideas.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,389 ✭✭✭NachoBusiness


    I doubt for one second the captain of that ship thought that the passenger meant he was gonna jump overboard. It's a figure of speech and I'd say he used the situation to his advantage. I mean, if you were threatening to jump overboard, why would you specify 'at the next stop'. Throwing yourself overboard when the ship ports would be pretty pointless. Asshole Captain.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,438 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    What colour was the paint?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    If the staff were non native speakers it might have been lost in translation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,635 ✭✭✭Pumpkinseeds


    I don't think you could describe him as a 'nightmare customer'. The man was justifiably annoyed about the wet paint in his cabin and he told them he didn't want to continue with the cruise. It was a total overreaction from staff. It appears that nobody took the time to actually speak to the man properly. What should have happened was an apology for the wet paint, an offer to move him to a different cabin and a proper conversation about what he meant by jump ship.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 340 ✭✭The_Mask


    Rule #1 Don't take it personal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭minidazzler


    diomed wrote: »
    Its an idiom. They are idiots. What is the issue? I would be irked. They have odd ideas.

    What country was the maitre'd from? It's not a worldwide idiom, it's strictly an English language thing that a lot of people wouldn't get....


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    Should of made him walk the plank


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    An idiotic, self entitled git put rightly back in his box in my opinion


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,669 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    I worked in a call centre where we had strict instructions to report any threats of self harm to the police. It rarely happened but we had to because if they were serious we'd be liable. And we weren't allowed make a judgement call on it because we're hardly qualified to make that sort of decision.


  • Posts: 26,052 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If the ships staff had any doubt at all about what was meant, then they have to err on the side of caution. If they hadn't, and he later flung himself off the ship, the repercussions would have been enormous.

    Lesser of two evils tbh. It's easy to think it's over reaction in hindsight, but if they were right it would have been much, much, worse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,572 ✭✭✭✭brummytom


    In fairness, if he was saying he was going to 'jump ship' at work or something, it'd be a silly reaction. Saying it on an actual ship, though...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,744 ✭✭✭diomed


    Royal Caribbean get the advertising they deserve from this, holidaymakers who wouldn't touch them with a bargepole (another idiom).
    American company + security staff = ignorant overreaction.
    I'm surprised they didn't shoot him for his own safety.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    You wouldn't shout 'Bombs Away' when having a poop in an airplane toilet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,219 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Possibly it's because they can't keep their own employees from committing suicide.
    The concern that I have is that there are so many crew members employed by Royal Caribbean who have gone overboard. Were these employees overwhelmed by work and felt hopeless away from their families? There is great stress placed on the cleaners, cabin attendants and waiters by their supervisors and department heads as Royal Caribbean struggles to stay profitable.
    http://www.cruiselawnews.com/2012/10/articles/disappearances-1/is-royal-caribbean-working-its-crew-members-to-death/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    You wouldn't shout 'Bombs Away' when having a poop in an airplane toilet.


    Or say 'Hi' to your cousin 'Jack'


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,263 ✭✭✭Gongoozler


    Candie wrote: »
    If they hadn't, and he later flung himself off the ship, the repercussions would have been enormous.

    In what way?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,793 ✭✭✭Red Kev


    You wouldn't shout 'Bombs Away' when having a poop in an airplane toilet.


    You do it when you flush, not when having the actual crap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,426 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    You wouldn't shout 'Bombs Away' when having a poop in an airplane toilet.

    The term to be used while in earshot of airline staff is "I'm just off to release a hostage" , everyone knows that's the universal term for having a dump while in flight.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Santa Cruz


    http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/crosby-grandad-judged-suicide-risk-9589150?ICID=FB-Liv-main

    A MERSEYSIDE great-grandad said his “holiday of a lifetime” was ruined when cruise staff judged him a suicide risk because he said he wanted to “jump ship”.

    The pensioner said he got wet paint on his trousers and hand after arriving in the cabin, because it had been freshly painted, and some of the furniture was stained.

    After complaining several times, he told a maitre d’ in the restaurant that he wanted to “jump ship” at the next stop on the trip last May.

    When he returned to his cabin, security staff and the ship’s second captain arrived and told the family they were seeking legal advice on whether Mr Moran could remain on the ship - as they thought he had threatened to throw himself overboard.



    Anyone else think that the captain made the right decision? Threatening to 'jump ship' can easily be interpreted as a suicide threat, and I wouldn't have taken any chances either. Judging by the comments section, folks are quick to accuse the cruise liner staff of overreacting, but my view is wanting to abandon your holiday over some paint on your trousers is twice as bad!

    Well as the Captain was dealing with a Scouser it was best to take extreme caution


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭Buona Fortuna


    Santa Cruz wrote: »
    Well as the Captain was dealing with a Scouser it was best to take extreme caution

    I know it said cruise but we're not just taling about the freight boat to Dublin are we?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    diomed wrote: »
    Royal Caribbean get the advertising they deserve from this, holidaymakers who wouldn't touch them with a bargepole (another idiom).
    American company + security staff = ignorant overreaction.
    I'm surprised they didn't shoot him for his own safety.

    Most of the crew on cruise ships are not American, the few cruises I have been on (yes I know :-)) the captains were Norwegian with a very broad range of nationalities following.


  • Posts: 26,052 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Gongoozler wrote: »
    In what way?

    If he's killed himself and it emerged that staff knew he threatened to do it, jobs would be lost and bad publicity would be everywhere. There's too much competition out there with cruises for bad publicity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 540 ✭✭✭GreatDefector


    Alright, alright.... Calm down lad


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,635 ✭✭✭Pumpkinseeds


    He's an elderly man using an old fashioned expression. Saying he wanted to 'jump ship' is saying he wanted to go absent without leave, not that he wanted to slit his wrists. I really can't fathom where this idea of him being suicidal came from.:confused: Again, if someone had actually sat down and spoken to the man, as was their job, the situation wouldn't have arisen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,880 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    I'm assuming non native english speakers here... idiots either way.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 626 ✭✭✭Massimo Cassagrande


    I'm assuming non native english speakers here... idiots either way.

    The scouse accent is indeed fairly unfathomable, but that's still a bit harsh.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    A business will always err on the side of caution with regards to customer safety. Say if the guy said, "I'm going to jump ship", the workers knew about this, and he then actually committed suicide, then the ship could be potentially hit with a very hefty lawsuit.

    What it doesn't say is whether there was a "Wet Paint" sign anywhere? If there were and the guy sat down, then he should take responsibility for that - however, if there wasn't, then he's justifiably angry, but the ship actions were justifiable.

    If you look it up, you'll see that it is surprisingly common for people to kill themselves while on cruise ships.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,263 ✭✭✭Gongoozler


    Candie wrote: »
    If he's killed himself and it emerged that staff knew he threatened to do it, jobs would be lost and bad publicity would be everywhere. There's too much competition out there with cruises for bad publicity.

    Yeah if he threatened to do it. But he didn't. And I think any reasonable person (and potential jury) would see that there was no reason for anybody to assume that's what he was implying,so no it would never realistically cost anyone their jobs. Not in that way anyway. Bad publicity may be another story, but I would still have enough faith in people to know the ridiculousness of making making that assumption.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 854 ✭✭✭dubscottie


    Treat them the same way you would like to be treated yourself.

    If they come at you all shouty, say "hi my name is xx", shake hands, and say "what is the problem you are having and how can I help.

    If you are any good at your job you will always have a solution or an alternative for them. ALWAYS!

    Shaking hands always calms a situation down..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,417 ✭✭✭ToddyDoody


    You need to use silence, lots of silence.


Advertisement